Premysl Hruby --> dev (2009-08-12 17:39:26 +0200):
> On (12/08/09 17:24), Jukka Salmi wrote:
[...]
> > Seems fine, but -- assuming POSIX.1 reliable signals -- you don't need
> > to reestablish the handler before returning from it. Or should systems
> > with the old
Premysl 'Anydot' Hruby --> dev (2009-08-11 23:43:58 +0200):
> This is much cleaner and portable way of using SIGCHLD. It also disallow
> existence of defunct processes, one which are executed for example from
> .Xsession before (on the end) exec /path/../dwm
> ---
> dwm.c |8 +---
> 1 file
Anselm R Garbe --> dev (2009-07-02 18:07:06 +0100):
> Well I rechecked the source and it would make dwm considerably more
> complex, especially the root window checks would be all over the
> place. No no ;)
> Classic multihead support is achieved using the classic way:
>
> DISPLAY=:0.0 dwm &
> DIS
Anselm R Garbe --> dwm mail list (2009-07-02 16:53:20
+0100):
> are you aware of anyone still using a classic multihead setup? (No Xinerama)
I am (finally got mga(4) to work in a dual head setup on NetBSD/i386 5.0
with native Xorg...). I've never used Xinerama on this system but it's
probably n
