Re: [dev] [surf] editing textboxes with external command

2009-11-20 Thread crap
That's a *great* idea. I don't really like to edit my url with dmenu anyway... liked the GTK box better and I think editing it with vim would be a lot better than GTK boxes. Moritz On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 01:10:41PM +0100, pancake wrote: > We can also use $EDITOR to edit the URL address. > > 12:

Re: [dev] [sw] Suckless web-framework

2010-04-04 Thread crap
Ugh, HTML-Mail I'm so not going to read this. Please change your mail client to something sane. On Mon, Apr 05, 2010 at 12:32:58AM +0200, Paul Malherbe wrote: > > > > > > > On 05/04/10 00:02, Uriel wrote: > cite="mid:g2m5d375e921004041502xe31f4cby6cfae45b67e18...@mail.gmail.com" > type=

Re: [dev] [dvtm] Fibonacci layout patch

2010-06-01 Thread crap
> I've been using dvtm at work a lot recently so I figured I'd port the > Fibonacci spiral/dwindle layouts to dvtm. This patch is for 0.5.2. I find > it's not as useful as the Fibonacci layouts in dwm but I figure why not > release it anyway. > > -Niki Yoshiuchi Do these layouts provide any ben

Re: [dev] XDG directories

2010-06-11 Thread crap
I'd prefer if old ~/.wmii would still serve as an override for the XDG-stuff if it exists. I don't want to move ~/.wmii around on the donzens of machines I have it installed.

Re: [dev] flo - a command line program for organizing events, to-dos, and deadlines

2010-08-14 Thread crap
What's the difference to remind(1)?

Re: [dev] flo - a command line program for organizing events, to-dos, and deadlines

2010-08-14 Thread crap
WTFPL has less LOL

Re: [dev] Problem building dmenu tip

2010-12-01 Thread crap
Isn't suckless supposed to use a portable subset of Makefile that's understood by most make-programs? Relying on gmake is usually a bad idea, even if it's present everywhere. I try to keep my makefiles portable by - for instance - using .c.o: instead of %.o: %.c which would

Re: [dev] question about surf browser and saving passwords

2011-01-31 Thread crap
Excerpts from Claudiu Bucur's message of Mon Jan 31 01:24:18 +0100 2011: > this is an intense mailing list... Also a thread-intense one, because some people's (or their MUAs) don't get their In-reply-to and References-headers fixed, screwing up the entire threading. It just happened in this threa

Re: [dev] Config files

2011-02-09 Thread crap
In case you're too lazy to write your own parser, this is a fairly "suckless" ini library: http://ndevilla.free.fr/iniparser/ While XML is pretty horrible on it's own, it is especially horrible for config files in my experience. As long as I don't have to touch it, it works for me, which is obviou

Re: [dev] Config files

2011-02-09 Thread crap
Excerpts from Connor Lane Smith's message of Wed Feb 09 12:29:31 +0100 2011: > If your options are fairly simple (i.e., no nested structures etc), > you could just make the config file valid shell: > > > key1=value1 > > key2=value2 > > Trivial to parse in C, and you can pull the config into your

Re: [dev] which minimal os

2011-02-16 Thread crap
Excerpts from Claudiu Bucur's message of Fri Feb 11 22:35:31 +0100 2011: > gentoo is as minimal as you can get or as complex as you want. you compile > everything locally, with the help of the portage repository (even the > kernel). it has been my closest experience to what i imagine "linux from >

Re: [dev] fast-booting to text editor

2011-03-20 Thread crap
Please don't use [ $USER = root ]. This is very unclean because the UID-0 user isn't always called root. Use id -u instead and spread the word. I hate it when things break because of this.

Re: [dev] /run coming to a linux distribution near you

2011-03-30 Thread crap
I agree with Poettering in exactly one point: /dev/.xxx is *bad*. I'm not saying /run is a clean solution, but /dev/.xxx is *wrong*. It might be OK for udev, because udev is responsible for populating /dev, but it's highly mysterious to me why they started cramming the other stuff in there, like fo