Re: [dev] [tabbed] compiles but does not work as expected with FreeBSD

You forgot the '-e' argument in surf. > tabbed surf -e On 9/28/19, Jason Smith wrote: > Here is my config.mk, compilation output and the behavior I get when I > execute tabbed as a screenshot. >

Re: [dev] [dwm] new release - transition from Openbox

> I've been using Openbox for several years. Is it worth switching to dwm? I have been using dwm since version 4 (like 12 years or so, I don't remember). Tiling window managers in general are good if you a heavy user of the console and your other applications are a web browser or a pdf reader. F

Re: [dev] books that rock

> - The awk language > - Software Tools in Pascal, Kernighan and Plauger (I think there is > a version of this book in C, isn't it?) I have both of them. The first version of Software Tools is written in ratfor which is almost a C dialect but doesn't support recursion and structures. None the

Re: [dev] books that rock

Project Oberon (New Edition 2013): http://www.inf.ethz.ch/personal/wirth/ProjectOberon/ "The little schemer" is a cute fun book which is more about recursion and abstraction than Lisp. Smalltalk-80: The Language and its Implementation (http://stephane.ducasse.free.fr/FreeBooks/BlueBook/Bluebook

Re: [dev] Reasonable Makefiles

You don't need to use the include statement. cat config.mk Makefile | make -f - pmarin. On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 1:19 PM, Nick wrote: > I was reading the opengroup specifications for make(1) recently[0], > and found that even our standard makefile practise of using 'inclu

Re: [dev] Re: Maintaining sbase

dash has a broken builtin echo command and they are not interested in fix it. I think busybox ash fixed the problem. dash> echo '\tshit' shit ash> echo '\tshit' \tshit On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 11:32 PM, Christian Neukirchen wrote: > Markus Teich writes: > >> What is your opinion on a shell f

Re: [dev] [announce] rat - ridiculously abysmal tar

Obviously C. Also you have to love Xlib, GTK+ and vintage console terminals. On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 2:58 AM, Alex Hutton wrote: > On 7 November 2012 03:00, Christoph Lohmann <2...@r-36.net> wrote: >> >> >> > b...but I though Go was suckless? ;_; >> >> >> No. There was only one person pretendi

Re: [dev] [dwm] Why am I having a gap between the master window and the others?

Thanks. Now a new question arose. Which applications need to have resizehints set to True? On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 8:31 PM, Hannes Blut wrote: > you probably want to set resize hints to false if you don't like it. for > more expaination search older ml entries.

[dev] [dwm] Why am I having a gap between the master window and the others?

I am using dwm 6.0. When I have the focus on a xterm and I try to resize the window a gap appears between the master window and the others. screenshot: http://i.imgur.com/rAUfL.png Until now I have used dwm 4.5 and I never had this problem. Cheers. pmarin.

Re: [dev] [st] VT100 Emulation

Why are we still emulating a 32 years old terminal? On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 2:06 AM, Kurt H Maier wrote: > On Sun, Feb 05, 2012 at 01:18:10AM +0100, Aurélien Aptel wrote: >> Actually, st does not implement every VT100/VT102/xterm escape sequence. >> > > Apparently Bjartur does not understand the m

Re: [dev] what's your opinion on Go

I have to confess that lately I am enjoying reading the Bratko's Prolog book. On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 8:00 PM, hiro <23h...@googlemail.com> wrote: > "The future is blablabla" > > This doesn't really matter for us individuals, generally. > My programming language is SMTP >

[dev] [dwm][dmenu] How to get static linked binaries for dwm and dmenu?

Hi all. Im trying to create static linked executables for dwm and demu but Im still having problems. I have followed this post[1] but Im having the following errors (with dwm)[2]. Have someone had better luck? How is the confing.mk? Im using Ubuntu 8.04 with dwm-5.9 [1] http://blog.plenz.com

Re: [dev] hidcur: Utility for hiding the mouse cursor in X11

Any advantage over unclutter? Does it work with dosbox and qemu? On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 2:48 PM, Ricardo Catalinas Jiménez wrote: > Hello, > > In case someone is interested, I wrote this little utility in C: >    https://github.com/jimenezrick/hidcur > > It hides the mouse cursor whenever is idle

Re: [dev] revolution

@ Le Tian, Calm down. You should have asked about our opinion about WMFS and why you like it instead of if It is better or worse than DWM. Always is interesting to know what other people are doing. I think it is not trolling, you simply asked the wrong question. Cheers. Pmarin. On Sat, Jun 11

Re: [dev] Distribution

Linux ≠ suckless On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 1:41 PM, Sir Cyrus wrote: > What's the most suckless Linux distribution? > >

[dev] musl libc

Have anyone tried it? http://www.etalabs.net/musl/

Re: [dev] [dwm] patch for statuscolors improved

Well It is just a patch not the atrocity done in dmenu by surf users. On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 1:57 PM, Claudio M. Alessi wrote: > It seems like useless rather than suckless. > > >

Re: [dev] [dwm] Windows size changes

AWT_TOOLKIT = MToolkit. Sorry. On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 11:16 PM, pmarin wrote: > On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 7:58 PM, David DEMELIER > wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I was surprised to see that a java window does not update its content, >> in fact nothing changes. If you res

Re: [dev] [dwm] Windows size changes

On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 7:58 PM, David DEMELIER wrote: > Hello, > > I was surprised to see that a java window does not update its content, > in fact nothing changes. If you resize the window nothing happens and > the usual behavior is that the window updates its content to the new > size. > > On p

Re: [dev] Re: sta.li progress

I mean glibc On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 1:40 PM, pmarin wrote: > I think p9p libc is a big wrapper around glib. There is no plan9 libc > for unix (only some stuff that comes with go but It can not be used > with an ansi c compiler). > > On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 9:34 AM, Jens Staal

Re: [dev] Re: sta.li progress

I think p9p libc is a big wrapper around glib. There is no plan9 libc for unix (only some stuff that comes with go but It can not be used with an ansi c compiler). On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 9:34 AM, Jens Staal wrote: > On a related note. Has anyone tried to compile APE on p9p? Would the > APE libc

Re: [dev] Interesting post about X11

*should be used* and *can be used* have different meaning in my poor English. Can you rationalize why Scheme *should be used *? On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 7:09 AM, Robert Ransom wrote: > On Sun, 20 Jun 2010 16:00:44 +0200 > Alexander Teinum wrote: > >> > Use Scheme.  See Scheme 48

Re: [dev] Suckless operating system

> Problem is the vast complexity they both contain is hidden inside > libwebkit. That thing is huge. I get the feeling surf and uzbl only > make the tip of the iceberg suck less. We would can say the same about dwm, X11 and xinerama. pmarin.

Re: [dev] [OT] twitter

> How do you have it be both persistent and distributed? p2p pmarin.

Re: [dev] Fwd: OT:GUI wireless connections management?

In Linux I use two scripts. I store the passwords in two plain files: wep: #! /bin/sh key="`grep $1 /home/pmarin/wep | cut -d' ' -f2`" sudo ifconfig wlan0 up sudo iwconfig wlan0 essid $1 sudo iwconfig wlan0 key $key sudo dhclient wlan0 wpa: #! /bin/sh sudo ifconfig wlan0 up

Re: [dev] SWK: The simple widget kit

Tk is not used  nowdays, Ttk is used instead and suport Themes, GTK and Qt based engines, antialising fonts and many more widgets. Perhaps is not suckless but I think It is the more unix friendly than other toolkits becouse It is very easy to wrap shell scritps with it. The only problem is that m

Re: [dev] Re: 9base-5

mtime.1 is fsize.1 getflags.1 is getflags.8 On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 11:32 AM, mikey wrote: > Dunno if this helps? > > http://man.cat-v.org/plan_9/1/mtime > http://man.cat-v.org/plan_9/8/getflags > > On 27/04/2010, Anselm R Garbe wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 09:56:29AM -0500, Chris Brannon

Re: [dev] Re: stali and OpenBSD userland etc.

Static linking + Linux + BSD userland == Mastodon Linux? http://www.mastodon.biz/ It is a lot outdated. On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 8:16 PM, finkler wrote: > On 04/15/10 08:39, Anselm R Garbe wrote: > > android isn't POSIX compliant and is probably more wide spread now > > then Linux desktops... ;

Re: [dev] Anyone have the traditional vi working on the xterm?

overwritten with the environment variable LINES. My xterm actualizes this variable each time the window is resized but It seems that vi is faster (it uses SIGWINCH). Cheers. pmarin

Re: [dev] building Vij

Aha, yes. That works. So no unicode support for me then, judging by the > comment in the Makefile. No, you should have unicode support if you have LC_CTYPE. This lines removes some extended regular expresions.

Re: [dev] building Vi

Comment the lines that begin with REINC, RELIB and RETGT in the Makefile

Re: [dev] Anyone have the traditional vi working on the xterm?

10 at 12:20 PM, pmarin wrote: > ctr-+l or ctrl+r are not working. I found where is the problem: The > window[1]  (number of lines that are shown in the screen are not > actualized when the screen are resized). > > > [1] you can view the window with 'set window' (works also in

Re: [dev] Anyone have the traditional vi working on the xterm?

ote: > I'm using vim and he resizing after i resize urxvt. > Try press ctrl+l - this combination redraw console, i often use it to > redraw stupied mc. > > On 4/17/10, pmarin wrote: >> This is not the problem. When I start vi in a xterm (or any terminal) >> vi

Re: [dev] Anyone have the traditional vi working on the xterm?

I need the Lisp mode. On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 11:35 PM, Jakub Lach wrote: > Dnia 16 kwietnia 2010 22:23 julien.steinhau...@orange.fr napisał(a): > >> Hello, >> >> I know it isn't the right solution but haven't your shell >> a shortcut to redraw the screen until you find a better fix ? > > As for

Re: [dev] Anyone have the traditional vi working on the xterm?

2010 at 11:37 PM, Michael P. Soulier wrote: > On 16/04/10 pmarin said: > >> The One True Vi: http://ex-vi.sourceforge.net/ > > I'm curious. I remember using vanilla Vi, and I found it unsufficient for my > work until I found Vim. Why would one prefer vanilla Vi? >

Re: [dev] Anyone have the traditional vi working on the xterm?

This is not the problem. When I start vi in a xterm (or any terminal) vi use all the size but if I resize the xterm (dynamic or tiled), vi maintains the old size and the screen become a mess when I edit text. On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 10:07 PM, Christoph Schied wrote: > On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 07

Re: [dev] Anyone have the traditional vi working on the xterm?

What kind of strange Xdefaults? On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 8:53 PM, pmarin wrote: > The One True Vi: http://ex-vi.sourceforge.net/ > > On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 8:49 PM, Rob wrote: >> Which version do you mean by original vi? >> $ pacman -Qi vi >> Name           : vi &

Re: [dev] Anyone have the traditional vi working on the xterm?

 : The original ex/vi text editor. > > That works fine with my xterm, maybe you've got some strange Xdefaults? > > > On 16 April 2010 19:29, pmarin wrote: >> Hi all. >> I am using the  traditional vi  and it doesn't resize in the xterm so >> I wonder if

[dev] Anyone have the traditional vi working on the xterm?

Hi all. I am using the traditional vi and it doesn't resize in the xterm so I wonder if someone have it working properly. I have looked at the source code and It is using a signal for SIGWINCH (the function onwinch in ex_v.c) but nothing happends. Cheers. pmarin

Re: [dev] [dmenu] A clickable dmenu is a dream?

¿Clickable dmenu == 9menu? http://dir.filewatcher.com/d/OpenBSD/3.5/alpha/9menu-1.7.tgz.12043.html On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 8:41 PM, Thuban wrote: > Good evening. > I just have written a script to have a menu in dwm, made with dmenu. It > makes me wonder if it is possible, by a patch or any other

[dev] [OFFTOPIC] How to know the size of a process?

Hi all. Anyone know how to know the size (kb) of a process in Linux? using the proc filesystem I can know the number of pages that it uses (/proc/pid/statm). How I can convert it to kb? Any posix way? pmarin

Re: [dev] [bug] [dwm] Resolution chages

I use the following script: #! /bin/sh output=LVDS if [ -f /tmp/screen ] then output=`cat /tmp/screen` fi if [ $output = "VGA" ] then xrandr --output LVDS --auto xrandr --output VGA --off echo "LVDS" > /tmp/screen else xrandr --output VGA --auto xrandr --output LVDS --off ec

Re: [dev] [OT] [OT]: Go programming language

On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 6:32 AM, Uriel wrote: > On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 11:45 AM, Dmitry Maluka > wrote: > You don't need to replace something that is useless and evil, as Go > shows. Just like Plan 9 didn't "replace" root and suid (or at least > not directly). > > The C preprocessor has been p

Re: [dev] [OT]: Go programming language

erceptions... > > uriel > > arrays are similar to old Pascal too: from go effective: "The size of an array is part of its type. The types [10]int and [20]int are distinct" and from "Why Pascal is Not My Favorite Programming Language": 2.1. The size of an array is part of its type. pmarin

Re: [dev] [OT]: Go programming language

I miss the Brian Kernighan's tutorial... On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 1:49 PM, Anselm R Garbe wrote: > 2009/11/11 Julien Steinhauser : >> On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 11:06:55AM +, Anselm R Garbe wrote: >>> >>> I'm officially announcing a go excercise project called: godwm (dwm >>> implemented in Go) >

Re: [dev] [DWM] Someone is having some kind of blinking with p9p acme and dwm?

Making acme floating doesn't work. I don't understand why if I kill acme the flickering still happens.

[dev] [DWM] Someone is having some kind of blinking with p9p acme and dwm?

Hi all. Recently I started using acme and I notice an odd behaviour in dwm, like dwm try to "re-tile" every few second all the windows even if I am not in the same tag that acme. Only happens when I start acme , although if I kill acme It still happen. pmarin.

Re: [dev] [OT] Suckless Distro

Xubuntu with a large /usr/local/* On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 5:26 PM, Ryan R wrote: > Gentoo <3 > > On 7/24/09, Jacob Todd wrote: >> Funtoo. >> >> On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 02:09:58PM +0900, Alex Matviychuk wrote: >>> I've been following the list for a while and I'm curious what everyone >>> is using

Re: [dev] OT - suckless or not ? :)

Well, I think the "suck less" term is not original from our comunity. The same happens with "the Unix philosophy" of XFCE (http://www.xfce.org/): "Xfce 4.6 embodies the traditional UNIX philosophy of modularity and re-usability..." On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 3:28 PM, Julien Pecqueur (JPEC)

Re: [dev] dwm only?

n Mon, May 25, 2009 at 3:38 PM, pmarin wrote: >> Most email filtering tools (eg., procmail) allow to trivially match >> strings in the body of an email rather than in the subject. (I'm >> amazed that I need to point this out). > > I can mention wmii in the body of an email and not be strictly wmii-related. >

Re: [dev] dwm only?

> Most email filtering tools (eg., procmail) allow to trivially match > strings in the body of an email rather than in the subject. (I'm > amazed that I need to point this out). I can mention wmii in the body of an email and not be strictly wmii-related.

Re: [dev] dwm only?

On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 12:40 PM, Michael wrote: > Anselm R Garbe wrote: >> If your topic is strictly dwm-related mention this in the subject >> (then people can match for "dwm"). >> >> If your topic is strictly wmii-related mention this in the subject as >> well (people can match for "wmii" then)

Re: [dev] dwm only?

ight, not to mention rude response. Dwm list >> > > > has plenty of _interesting_ topics related to dwm or any other >> > > > minimal suckless project. It is fantastic way to get informed about >> > > > other minimal projects and better ways to do someth

Re: [dev] dwm only?

her than ad hominems, do you have any evidence that my statement > regarding the amount of non-dwm related traffic in the dwm@ list is > untrue? > > Thank you > > uriel > > On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 4:45 PM, pmarin wrote: >> Uriel this is not 9fans, please send your st

Re: [dev] dwm only?

4, 2009 at 2:22 PM, Benjamin Conner > wrote: >>> Why not to maintain dwm list and redirect its content to dev list? >> >> That's a great idea! >> >> On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 8:19 AM, pmarin wrote: >>> >>> Why not to maintain dwm list and

Re: [dev] dwm only?

Why not to maintain dwm list and redirect its content to dev list? On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 2:07 PM, Benjamin Conner wrote: > I'd like to know this too.  I would only like dwm ones like the lists used > to be. > > On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 4:44 AM, Dusan wrote: >> >> Is there a way to get only dwm