On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 07:46:05PM +0200, markus schnalke wrote:
> [2009-09-17 10:48] sta...@cs.tu-berlin.de
> >
> > I used to depend heavily on sessions and especially tabs. I started using
> > them in a non-tiling WM and was attracted by the lower memory consumption.
> > I even hacked couple of
On Thu, 1 Oct 2009 21:20:39 +0200
Julien Steinhauser wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 01, 2009 at 07:04:52AM -0500, hailukah wrote:
>
> > Speaking of middle click, is there a way to specify what it does?
> > I've searched through the webkitgtk documentation but haven't found
> > anything. I'd just like to
2009/10/1 Julien Steinhauser :
> Hello, this function is from uzbl wiki, it does the trick.
>
> (function() {
> window.addEventListener("click", function(e) {
> if (e.button === 1) {
> var new_uri = e.srcElement.href;
> if (new_uri
On Thu, Oct 01, 2009 at 07:04:52AM -0500, hailukah wrote:
> Speaking of middle click, is there a way to specify what it does? I've
> searched through the webkitgtk documentation but haven't found
> anything. I'd just like to middle click to open a link in a new
> window. Even a javascript solu
On Thu, 1 Oct 2009 16:13:51 +0900
fugou nashi wrote:
> so, it should add links into the tree with middle click,
Speaking of middle click, is there a way to specify what it does? I've
searched through the webkitgtk documentation but haven't found
anything. I'd just like to middle click to open
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 12:50 PM, Jessta wrote:
> Last night I put together a simple browsing 'tab' list with vertical
> dmenu, surf, and a shell script.
something like this would be great if was functionally more or less
identical to using firefox with tree-style tabs, tab history, and
saved ses
[2009-09-17 10:48] sta...@cs.tu-berlin.de
>
> I used to depend heavily on sessions and especially tabs. I started using
> them in a non-tiling WM and was attracted by the lower memory consumption.
> I even hacked couple of ugly scripts for loading and saving sessions in
> w3m+screen. I misused ta
>> I don't see how that hits any reasonably modern computer resources (I
>> mean Opera, firefox is notorious for bringing down to its knees anything
>> you throw at it). Resource usage is not an argument in this discussion
>> for me. Actually, I'd use dwm were it written in Tcl/Tk or Python, for I
On 18/09/2009, Pinocchio wrote:
>
> You mean something like https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/5890
>
> It would be interesting to generalize this (automatically, of course) to a
> wm.
I love that addon and it's the main thing I miss about firefox.
Last night I put together a simple b
On Thu, 17 Sep 2009 02:37:23 -0700, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
On 9/17/09, Antoni Grzymala wrote:
Anselm R Garbe dixit (2009-09-17, 09:26):
[...]
i recognised four ideas:
* navigation: simple navigation and client management (ordering matters)
* overview: list of icons, client names, for quick
On Thu, 17 Sep 2009 04:23:46 -0700, pancake wrote:
Few random things I want to comment in the thread..
What about a tree of tabs? This way you can keep topics and
hirearchically relations visually easy.
You mean something like https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/5890
It would be
On Thu 17 Sep 2009 at 01:54:01 PDT Jessta wrote:
I tend to use tabs as a stack of temporary bookmarks, I navigate to a
page and open all the links I want to see on to tabs, closed that
pages and move through all the tabs, it pretty much makes the back
button redundant.
Mostly I'm just putting th
pancake wrote:
Few random things I want to comment in the thread..
What about a tree of tabs? This way you can keep topics and
hirearchically relations visually easy.
One of the best features of firefox3 is the undo-tab :) And it's also
nice to keep the browsing
history on every tab (this is
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 10:26 AM, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
> I'm always open for improvements if there is a good reason and cause
> identified. But first please really think carefully what's causing
> this mis-use of 70 tabs in Opera for you. That's surely related to an
> issue that has nothing to do
Few random things I want to comment in the thread..
What about a tree of tabs? This way you can keep topics and
hirearchically relations visually easy.
One of the best features of firefox3 is the undo-tab :) And it's also
nice to keep the browsing
history on every tab (this is, when you open
* Antoni Grzymala [2009-09-17 11:05]:
> sta...@cs.tu-berlin.de dixit (2009-09-17, 10:48):
> > * Antoni Grzymala [2009-09-17 10:16]:
> Er... Tasks (tags) in www browsing would be absurd, because I'd either
> have to define a limited sensible number of them and try to assign
> anything I come acros
On 9/17/09, Antoni Grzymala wrote:
> Anselm R Garbe dixit (2009-09-17, 09:26):
>
> [...]
>
>> identified. But first please really think carefully what's causing
>> this mis-use of 70 tabs in Opera for you. That's surely related to an
>> issue that has nothing to do with the WM or with the web rend
Anselm R Garbe dixit (2009-09-17, 09:56):
> 2009/9/17 Jessta :
> > I tend to use tabs as a stack of temporary bookmarks, I navigate to a
> > page and open all the links I want to see on to tabs, closed that
> > pages and move through all the tabs, it pretty much makes the back
> > button redundant
sta...@cs.tu-berlin.de dixit (2009-09-17, 10:48):
> * Antoni Grzymala [2009-09-17 10:16]:
> > I usually have about 70 tabs open in Opera (and often lots more). Since
> > Operas tab manager is *specialized* for this number of fullscreen
> > windows it works well. I can easyli navigate those using
2009/9/17 Jessta :
> I tend to use tabs as a stack of temporary bookmarks, I navigate to a
> page and open all the links I want to see on to tabs, closed that
> pages and move through all the tabs, it pretty much makes the back
> button redundant.
>
> Mostly I'm just putting things on the stack or
I tend to use tabs as a stack of temporary bookmarks, I navigate to a
page and open all the links I want to see on to tabs, closed that
pages and move through all the tabs, it pretty much makes the back
button redundant.
Mostly I'm just putting things on the stack or pulling them off, I
don't tend
* Antoni Grzymala [2009-09-17 10:16]:
> I usually have about 70 tabs open in Opera (and often lots more). Since
> Operas tab manager is *specialized* for this number of fullscreen
> windows it works well. I can easyli navigate those using single-letter
> keystrokes.
>
> This isn't possible or sen
Anselm R Garbe dixit (2009-09-17, 09:26):
[...]
> identified. But first please really think carefully what's causing
> this mis-use of 70 tabs in Opera for you. That's surely related to an
> issue that has nothing to do with the WM or with the web rendering
> engine...
I think this is mostly my
2009/9/17 Antoni Grzymala :
> Anselm R Garbe dixit (2009-09-16, 14:48):
>
>> > I wonder if there is a schedule for the next developpment on surf. Is
>> > it planned to add multi-tab support? If no, I guess I'll take a look
>> > at the code and submit an ugly-but-functional patch.
>>
>> I think tab
Anselm R Garbe dixit (2009-09-16, 14:48):
> > I wonder if there is a schedule for the next developpment on surf. Is
> > it planned to add multi-tab support? If no, I guess I'll take a look
> > at the code and submit an ugly-but-functional patch.
>
> I think tab support in firefox/IE/chrome/Safari
2009/9/16 pancake :
> As I understand, the tabbing functionality will be implemented with XID as
> multiple embedded
> surfs inside an external application managing the tabs. It is far more
> secure and simple. (like in chromium)
>
Well, thanks for your anwsers. Maybe I'll give a chance to dwm/ta
* poz [2009-09-16 15:56]:
> 2009/9/16 Anselm R Garbe :
>
> > I think tab support in firefox/IE/chrome/Safari/Opera is just a ugly
> > workaround due to the limitations present in floating desktop
> > environments. Tab support is the WMs job -> use dwm and it'll work
> > like a charm to use tags a
As I understand, the tabbing functionality will be implemented with XID
as multiple embedded
surfs inside an external application managing the tabs. It is far more
secure and simple. (like in chromium)
Guillaume Leconte wrote:
Hi surf-list!
I wonder if there is a schedule for the next develop
On Wed, 16 Sep 2009 15:55:22 +0200
poz wrote:
> 2009/9/16 Anselm R Garbe :
>
> > I think tab support in firefox/IE/chrome/Safari/Opera is just a ugly
> > workaround due to the limitations present in floating desktop
> > environments. Tab support is the WMs job -> use dwm and it'll work
> > like
2009/9/16 poz :
> 2009/9/16 Anselm R Garbe :
>
>> I think tab support in firefox/IE/chrome/Safari/Opera is just a ugly
>> workaround due to the limitations present in floating desktop
>> environments. Tab support is the WMs job -> use dwm and it'll work
>> like a charm to use tags and layouts in co
Hi!
2009/9/16 Slawomir Gonet :
> I think that there is no plans for tabs support.
>
Yes and no. surf supports X embedding. This can be used to embed surf
into another Xwindow. Actually I'm writing on another application,
named tabbed[1]. When it's in a usable state, it will be able to
display diff
2009/9/16 Anselm R Garbe :
> I think tab support in firefox/IE/chrome/Safari/Opera is just a ugly
> workaround due to the limitations present in floating desktop
> environments. Tab support is the WMs job -> use dwm and it'll work
> like a charm to use tags and layouts in conjunction with surf.
M
That doesn't sound very suckless. The window manager is there to
manage multiple instances of surf, why should the browser need its own
window managment? Wouldn't it be better to adjust the window manager
to work well with multiple windows instead of adding tabs to each and
every application? I wou
2009/9/16 Guillaume Leconte :
> Hi surf-list!
>
> I wonder if there is a schedule for the next developpment on surf. Is
> it planned to add multi-tab support? If no, I guess I'll take a look
> at the code and submit an ugly-but-functional patch.
I think tab support in firefox/IE/chrome/Safari/Oper
I think that there is no plans for tabs support.
pgpUGyfR5FVRU.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hi surf-list!
I wonder if there is a schedule for the next developpment on surf. Is
it planned to add multi-tab support? If no, I guess I'll take a look
at the code and submit an ugly-but-functional patch.
--
« I've seen things you people wouldn't believe. Attack ships on fire
off the shoulder
36 matches
Mail list logo
