On Sun, Feb 09, 2014 at 09:17:07PM -0500, Carlos Torres wrote:
Hello,
This patch is food for thought. i looked closer at what util-linux
does (ugh) and found that their exit codes are what swapon/swapoff
return. so this is an alternative patch that behaves the same way. I
thought its
Hello,
On 2/10/14, sin s...@2f30.org wrote:
So I don't see how or-ing the return values actually does anything.
It can only be -1 or 0.
Am I missing something here?
No sir. this patch simply emulates whats wrong with util-linux's
swapon/swapoff.
Its not necessary unless you want full
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 09:19:10AM -0500, Carlos Torres wrote:
Hello,
On 2/10/14, sin s...@2f30.org wrote:
So I don't see how or-ing the return values actually does anything.
It can only be -1 or 0.
Am I missing something here?
No sir. this patch simply emulates whats wrong with
Hello,
This patch is food for thought. i looked closer at what util-linux
does (ugh) and found that their exit codes are what swapon/swapoff
return. so this is an alternative patch that behaves the same way. I
thought its possible there are shell scripts out there that are
interested in the
