On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 06:59:50AM +0100, Roberto E. Vargas Caballero wrote:
> Why do you suppose that every person making a distribution package is
> going to have a git repository?. We use git as our central
> repository, but it doesn't mean we force to everyone to use it.
I don't, but it's not
Hi,
> I considered that, but thought it the lesser evil. *Ideally*, build
> systems and version control systems shouldn't be tightly coupled, if at
> all. I have my own prejudices, and we can agree to cordially disagree on
> such a trivial and here insignificant matter.
Why do you suppose that
> On Mon, 16 Mar 2015 22:18:33 +0100 Alex Pilon wrote:
> > Less code, and people notice when things aren't in the repo unlike a
> > little used target.
>
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 10:18:33PM +0100, Christoph Lohmann wrote:
> That's too simple-minded. You are adding a dependency on git.
I considered
Greetings.
On Mon, 16 Mar 2015 22:18:33 +0100 Alex Pilon wrote:
> commit ec6937b989a171e872c58bc60f8b21bd25880cd5
> Author: M Farkas-Dyck
> Date: Wed Dec 10 14:29:34 2014 -0500
>
> dist arg.h; needed to build
>
> diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
> index 52af636..2
It's easy to forget things, like fixed with the following out of tree
patch.
commit ec6937b989a171e872c58bc60f8b21bd25880cd5
Author: M Farkas-Dyck
Date: Wed Dec 10 14:29:34 2014 -0500
dist arg.h; needed to build
diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
index 52af636..25719
