On Sat, 5 Jan 2019 15:12:41 -0600
Samuel Holland wrote:
> For a single-user laptop or workstation, why does there even need to
> be a concept of "logging in"? And why do you need 3-4 layers of
> shells running in the background to manage your X session? You've got:
> - your login shell
> - star
On 01/05/19 13:54, Sean MacLennan wrote:
> I almost always run X11... so I want it to startup when I login.
> Without a DM, this is how I handle it.
For a single-user laptop or workstation, why does there even need to be a
concept of "logging in"? And why do you need 3-4 layers of shells running i
On Sat, 5 Jan 2019 17:09:32 -0200
Caio Barros wrote:
> Although I too have a somewhat nostalgic
> feeling when typing a command to load the window manager, I don't mind
> at all automating it, but for that a DM is not necessary.
I almost always run X11... so I want it to startup when I login.
Wi
Hi
[2019-01-05 17:09] Caio Barros
>
> Em sex, 4 de jan de 2019 às 19:42, Markus Wichmann
> escreveu:
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 04, 2019 at 02:17:12PM -0200, Caio Barros wrote:
> > > That's it! Yes, I'm unfotunately still runing a display manager:
> > > lightdm. I'm slowly getting rid of the bloat [..
Em sex, 4 de jan de 2019 às 19:42, Markus Wichmann escreveu:
>
> On Fri, Jan 04, 2019 at 02:17:12PM -0200, Caio Barros wrote:
> > That's it! Yes, I'm unfotunately still runing a display manager:
> > lightdm. I'm slowly getting rid of the bloat [...]
>
> It was never my intention to advise you of h
On Fri, Jan 04, 2019 at 02:17:12PM -0200, Caio Barros wrote:
> That's it! Yes, I'm unfotunately still runing a display manager:
> lightdm. I'm slowly getting rid of the bloat [...]
It was never my intention to advise you of how bloated or unbloated your
system can be. To be honest, I don't know if
I had similar problems before (I use startx to start X). They vanished when I
put `export PATH=$HOME/bin:$PATH` in my .xinitrc in addition to my .zshenv.
Em sex, 4 de jan de 2019 às 10:50, Leonardo Taccari
> Maybe that PATH (with the `/home/caio/scripts') is not seen by
> dmenu (and probably all other X11 applications invoked from dwm).
> This depends how X11 was started.
>
> (If no other dmenu-s is running and your operating systems support
> a pr
On Fri, Jan 04, 2019 at 10:20:42AM -0200, Caio Barros wrote:
> Em qui, 3 de jan de 2019 às 23:22, Martin Tournoij
> escreveu:
>
> > Note there is a typo in that hashbang,
>
> oops! I was typing as I went :D. Actually in the original script I
> didn't add the shebang #!/bin/sh, but I did it now
On January 4, 2019 12:20:42 PM UTC, Caio Barros wrote:
>Em qui, 3 de jan de 2019 às 23:22, Martin Tournoij
>escreveu:
>
>> Note there is a typo in that hashbang,
>
>oops! I was typing as I went :D. Actually in the original script I
>didn't add the shebang #!/bin/sh, but I did it now
So you di
Hello Caio,
Caio Barros writes:
> [...]
> Hum, still doesn't work. If I understand correctly, dwm uses the scipt
> dmenu_path to know which are the available commands. When I look to my
> ~/.cache folder it doesn't have my scripts in there. Maybe it is the
> way I added the folder to path? I think
Em qui, 3 de jan de 2019 às 23:22, Martin Tournoij escreveu:
> Note there is a typo in that hashbang,
oops! I was typing as I went :D. Actually in the original script I
didn't add the shebang #!/bin/sh, but I did it now
> Just reboot your system if you're unsure.
Hum, still doesn't work. If I
On Fri, Jan 4, 2019, at 14:14, Caio Barros wrote:
> #!bin/sh
> surf https://duckduckgo.com
Note there is a typo in that hashbang,
> That works, but for some reason dmenu (+ dwm) doesn't accept this
> command. It only works if I type the full directory (i. e.
> ~/scripts/duck or /home/caio/scripts
Hi everyone,
I have built some simple shell scripts and put tem all on a ~/scripts
directory. The directory was already added to PATH so if I'm on a
terminal I can just type, for instance:
$ duck
and that should launch a script wich contains
#!bin/sh
surf https://duckduckgo.com
That works, but
14 matches
Mail list logo
