Attached is a really important diff against tip I hope to get into 6.0.
It might need additional testing, but otherwise works fine for me.
Thanks in advance for the next 5 years!
diff -r 4548c824adac dwm.c
--- a/dwm.c Sun Jul 10 21:25:23 2011 +0100
+++ b/dwm.c Wed Jul 13 14:44:09 2011
On Wed, 13 Jul 2011 14:47:05 +0200, ml+suckl...@wzff.de wrote:
Attached is a really important diff against tip I hope to get into 6.0.
It might need additional testing, but otherwise works fine for me.
Thanks in advance for the next 5 years!
diff -r 4548c824adac dwm.c
--- a/dwm.c Sun Jul
[2011-07-13 14:47] ml+suckl...@wzff.de
Attached is a really important diff against tip I hope to get into 6.0.
It might need additional testing, but otherwise works fine for me.
Thanks in advance for the next 5 years!
diff -r 4548c824adac dwm.c
--- a/dwm.c Sun Jul 10 21:25:23 2011 +0100
Hi,
after using dwm for about a year now I decided I don't like that the title
bar has the 'selected' background-color. I believe the idea was to provide
a visible way to determine the active screen, but since I don't use
multi-head very often and IMHO the presence/absence of the title text is
And an alternate, for those with statuscolors applied. (not that it
was difficult at all to produce)
diff -r 4548c824adac dwm.c
--- a/dwm.c Sun Jul 10 21:25:23 2011 +0100
+++ b/dwm.c Mon Jul 11 02:30:13 2011 +0200
@@ -760,7 +760,7 @@
if((dc.w = dc.x - x) bh) {
dc.x = x;
if(m-sel) {
-
