Re: [dev] [st] [PATCH] FAQ: fix wording

On Tue, Mar 10, 2015, at 05:28 PM, Roberto E. Vargas Caballero wrote: > OpenBSD lacks librt, despite it being mandatory in POSIX That is fine, but I think a little bit better would be: "OpenBSD lacks librt, even though librt is required by POSIX." -- http://www.fastmail.com - mmm... Fastma

Re: [dev] [st] [PATCH] FAQ: fix wording

> > I think this is what was originally intended: > > OpenBSD lacks of librt, despite it *being* mandatory in POSIX > Uhmmm, I think you are rigth here. The correct sentence should be: OpenBSD lacks librt, despite it being mandatory in POSIX is it? (you guys know that my engl

Re: [dev] [st] [PATCH] FAQ: fix wording

> ## I cannot compile st in OpenBSD > > -OpenBSD lacks of librt, despite it begin mandatory in POSIX > +OpenBSD lacks of librt, despite it began to be mandatory in POSIX > > . Applied, with removing of 'of'. Re

Re: [dev] [st] [PATCH] FAQ: fix wording

Ivan Delalande wrote: > OpenBSD lacks of librt, despite it *being* mandatory in POSIX Heyho, While we're at it, according to my understanding of the english language the `of` is wrong and should be removed since `lack` is used as a verb and not as a noun here. --Markus

Re: [dev] [st] [PATCH] FAQ: fix wording

Hi, On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 01:23:07AM +0100, Alexander Huemer wrote: > -OpenBSD lacks of librt, despite it begin mandatory in POSIX > +OpenBSD lacks of librt, despite it began to be mandatory in POSIX I think this is what was originally intended: OpenBSD lacks of librt, despite it *bein

[dev] [st] [PATCH] FAQ: fix wording

--- FAQ | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/FAQ b/FAQ index ee1c154..7adb2af 100644 --- a/FAQ +++ b/FAQ @@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ in TERM. ## I cannot compile st in OpenBSD -OpenBSD lacks of librt, despite it begin mandatory in POSIX +OpenBSD lacks of librt, despite it