well, google for /etc/polipo/forbidden adblock
On 6/4/15, Ivan Tham ivanthamjun...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 08:32:42PM +0200, hiro wrote:
Does your polipo cache https traffic?
Thanks, I just found out that polipo doesn't cache https traffic but
some other cache server does.
See my previous mailing list messages for details. I keep my local repo here:
https://github.com/legitparty/surf-isolated
Ben
Original Message
From: Eric Pruitt
Sent: Wednesday, June 3, 2015 11:53 AM
To: dev mail list
Reply To: dev mail list
Subject: Re: [dev] [surf] Using more memory than
On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 10:29:32AM +0800, Ivan Tham wrote:
Why can't surf beat dillo which is a gecko-based browser?
Hi, dillo uses its own internal layout engine.
If you wish to compare fairly dillo and surf you have to load surf without
javascript: surf deals with scripts, where dillo afaik
On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 08:32:42PM +0200, hiro wrote:
Does your polipo cache https traffic?
Thanks, I just found out that polipo doesn't cache https traffic but
some other cache server does.
If you know what /etc/hosts is and how polipo does it's dns requests
you should be able to figure out
Does your polipo cache https traffic?
If you know what /etc/hosts is and how polipo does it's dns requests
you should be able to figure out your question yourself :)
Reply To: dev mail list
Subject: Re: [dev] [surf] Using more memory than firefox
On Mon, Jun 01, 2015 at 09:54:46AM -0700, tauto...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Ivan,
Also, I prefer to isolate state between different browser windows/tabs. If
firefox is sharing process state between windows, and saving memory
On Tue, Jun 02, 2015 at 01:34:28PM -0700, tauto...@gmail.com wrote:
When I look at top, I see a lot of memory usage, but most of that is shared
mappings. What I look at is the active memory use, and virtual memory
statistics, to see what is going on with memory. The only performance issue I
On Mon, Jun 01, 2015 at 09:54:46AM -0700, tauto...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Ivan,
Also, I prefer to isolate state between different browser windows/tabs. If
firefox is sharing process state between windows, and saving memory usage that
way, then I see it as a security design issue.
Hi,
Is
* Ivan Tham 2015-06-02 16:37
Extra: How do I open a link in surf using the keyboard in the current
window and in a new window?
vanilla surf: when carret browsing is active, you may search for the
link's text and press enter (opens in the current window).
otherwise: look at the
On 1 June 2015 at 16:10, Ivan Tham ivanthamjun...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, I use 2 windows of surf uses more memory then using firefox with 6 tabs
opened. Is there some memory leaks?
Open the six exact tabs of your FF in surf and compare that.
Open the two pages from your surf into your FF and
On Mon, Jun 01, 2015 at 04:14:36PM +0100, Raphaël Proust wrote:
Hi, I use 2 windows of surf uses more memory then using firefox with 6 tabs
opened. Is there some memory leaks?
Open the six exact tabs of your FF in surf and compare that.
Open the two pages from your surf into your FF and compare
Hi, I use 2 windows of surf uses more memory then using firefox with 6 tabs
opened. Is there some memory leaks?
--
_
Do what you like, like what you do.
-
\ ^__^
\ (oo)\___
(__)\ )\/\
, and saving memory usage that
way, then I see it as a security design issue.
Ben
Original Message
From: Ivan Tham
Sent: Monday, June 1, 2015 8:23 AM
To: dev@suckless.org
Reply To: dev mail list
Subject: Re: [dev] [surf] Using more memory than firefox
On Mon, Jun 01, 2015 at 04:14:36PM +0100
13 matches
Mail list logo
