On 22/06/2012, Strake wrote:
> Another option would be Clutter: http://trac.webkit.org/wiki/clutter
>
Never mind, it's just another GTK. Sorry.
Another option would be Clutter: http://trac.webkit.org/wiki/clutter
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 11:23:21AM +0200, Swiatoslaw Gal wrote:
> Is anyone planning to port surf for gtk3?
If anything I would like to see a "port" to EFL using Ewebkit...
--
Marc Andre Tanner >< http://www.brain-dump.org/ >< GPG key: CF7D56C0
Dnia 20 czerwca 2012 13:17 hiro <23h...@googlemail.com> napisał(a):
> how many fps does surf have on a 7850? Thinking about buying one to
> improve scrolling.
Haha. Good one.
how many fps does surf have on a 7850? Thinking about buying one to
improve scrolling.
i've been doing some rendering tests (scaling window on complex sites
while the cpu is at 100%
and stuf flike that). and i have to say that surf-gtk3 runs faster than
gtk2 and scrollbars look
just better, a part from that it looks the same. no performance
difference when cpu is not 100%
On 06/
On 2012-06-20 02:50, Andy Spencer wrote:
> Maybe I'll look into drawing with gtk3, I think it uses cairo or
> something?
Ok, this one has the drawing code done in cairo. I think that's about
all there is to do. It should work with both gtk2 and gtk3, well,
gtk-2.24 at least.
diff -r f0cea0f2bfc6 c
On 2012-06-19 11:41, pancake wrote:
> i've been thinking about that, but after some tries i realized it would
> require more changes than expected, because of the GDK thing.
>
> I'm with creating a fork (surf3?) and start working on that, but first
> someone should get a working branch.
>
> I don
Ah, I am sorry. I just realised that I had only the input widgets
(like the ones been mentioned) in mind. AFAIK, GTK and folks also do
the rendering of the actual page, which dmenu would not – and should
not – be suitable for.
On 19 June 2012 16:39, Ruben Mikkonen wrote:
> Scroll bars are quite useless, since the data they contain is not
> important (where in the page the view is), and using scroll bars to
> actually scroll is just dumb.
>
> For multiline text editing you can use another external program or
> hack dmenu
Scroll bars are quite useless, since the data they contain is not
important (where in the page the view is), and using scroll bars to
actually scroll is just dumb.
For multiline text editing you can use another external program or
hack dmenu. I prefer the former, because I see no other use except
On 19 June 2012 16:14, Ruben Mikkonen wrote:
> No need to develop swk, since we already have dmenu, which I consider
> the ultimate widget kit. A minute ago I added -n flag to disable it
> outputting (eg. passwords), so it really can be used as a web
> browser's widget kit.
>
> Attached file is th
No need to develop swk, since we already have dmenu, which I consider
the ultimate widget kit. A minute ago I added -n flag to disable it
outputting (eg. passwords), so it really can be used as a web
browser's widget kit.
Attached file is the trivial patch to disable outputting for dmenu-4.5.
On
On 19 June 2012 12:53, Jakub Lach wrote:
> Dnia 19 czerwca 2012 18:33 Luis Anaya napisał(a):
>
>> Andrew Hills writes:
>> >> You must be very proud of yourself?
>> > Yes, it is very difficult to use a computer without bloat. It is like a
>> > chair without a cushion.
>>
>> I do not think that it
Dnia 19 czerwca 2012 18:33 Luis Anaya napisał(a):
> Andrew Hills writes:
> >> You must be very proud of yourself?
> > Yes, it is very difficult to use a computer without bloat. It is like a
> > chair without a cushion.
>
> I do not think that it is something extravagant IMHO.
Luxury. We used
Andrew Hills writes:
>> You must be very proud of yourself?
> Yes, it is very difficult to use a computer without bloat. It is like a
> chair without a cushion.
I do not think that it is something extravagant IMHO.
I have an ARM Linux system without GTK and QT. I log into it
through XDM and th
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 11:54:51AM -0400, Andrew Hills wrote:
> > You must be very proud of yourself?
>
> Yes, it is very difficult to use a computer without bloat. It is like a
> chair without a cushion.
No. It is like a chair without a mass spectrometer.
-- From Swiatoslaw Gal 19-06-2012 at 11:23 --
> Is anyone planning to port surf for gtk3?
I ask because surf on my (unstable) debian machine stopped working. gdb
returns few times:
@0: event.layerX and event.layerY are broken and deprecated in WebKit. They
will be removed from
Dnia 19 czerwca 2012 17:50 Calvin Morrison
napisał(a):
> On 19 June 2012 11:42, Jakub Lach wrote:
> >> Yes, I still have Qt3 and GTK1 on my systems :-)
> >
> > Yes, I still have no Qt or GTK whatsoever.
>
> You must be very proud of yourself?
Yes, almost as much as people bragging about
using
tisdagen den 19 juni 2012 11.11.14 skrev Calvin Morrison:
> All of that, to say - we cannot (and I don't think anyone does)
> pretend that surf's underlying core doesn't suck - glib is a
> nightmare to work with and Qt isn't much better. the whole g-blob is
> terrible, but we wrap it up and pret
> You must be very proud of yourself?
Yes, it is very difficult to use a computer without bloat. It is like a
chair without a cushion.
--Andrew Hills
On 19 June 2012 11:42, Jakub Lach wrote:
>> Yes, I still have Qt3 and GTK1 on my systems :-)
>
> Yes, I still have no Qt or GTK whatsoever.
You must be very proud of yourself?
> Yes, I still have Qt3 and GTK1 on my systems :-)
Yes, I still have no Qt or GTK whatsoever.
On 19 June 2012 11:20, pancake wrote:
> On 06/19/12 17:11, Calvin Morrison wrote:
>>
>> On 19 June 2012 09:48, Luis Anaya wrote:
>>>
>>> Calvin Morrison writes:
>>>
Is anyone planning to port surf for gtk3?
>>>
>>> Once I have a system that uses GTK3, I'd have to do it.
>>>
On 06/19/12 17:11, Calvin Morrison wrote:
On 19 June 2012 09:48, Luis Anaya wrote:
Calvin Morrison writes:
Is anyone planning to port surf for gtk3?
Once I have a system that uses GTK3, I'd have to do it.
are you from the past?
Pretty close: I use Slackware.
I am wondering if there are
On 19 June 2012 09:48, Luis Anaya wrote:
> Calvin Morrison writes:
>
>>> >>> Is anyone planning to port surf for gtk3?
>>> >> Once I have a system that uses GTK3, I'd have to do it.
>>> >>
>>> > are you from the past?
>>> Pretty close: I use Slackware.
>>
>> I am wondering if there are any advant
Calvin Morrison writes:
>> >>> Is anyone planning to port surf for gtk3?
>> >> Once I have a system that uses GTK3, I'd have to do it.
>> >>
>> > are you from the past?
>> Pretty close: I use Slackware.
>
> I am wondering if there are any advantages to using gtk3?
My 2 cents... without any suppo
On Jun 19, 2012 6:52 AM, "Troels Henriksen" wrote:
>
> pancake writes:
>
> > On 06/19/12 12:45, Troels Henriksen wrote:
> >> Swiatoslaw Gal writes:
> >>
> >>> Is anyone planning to port surf for gtk3?
> >> Once I have a system that uses GTK3, I'd have to do it.
> >>
> > are you from the past?
>
pancake writes:
> On 06/19/12 12:45, Troels Henriksen wrote:
>> Swiatoslaw Gal writes:
>>
>>> Is anyone planning to port surf for gtk3?
>> Once I have a system that uses GTK3, I'd have to do it.
>>
> are you from the past?
Pretty close: I use Slackware.
--
\ Troels
/\ Henriksen
On 06/19/12 12:45, Troels Henriksen wrote:
Swiatoslaw Gal writes:
Is anyone planning to port surf for gtk3?
Once I have a system that uses GTK3, I'd have to do it.
are you from the past?
Swiatoslaw Gal writes:
> Is anyone planning to port surf for gtk3?
Once I have a system that uses GTK3, I'd have to do it.
--
\ Troels
/\ Henriksen
i've been thinking about that, but after some tries i realized it would
require more changes than expected, because of the GDK thing.
I'm with creating a fork (surf3?) and start working on that, but first
someone should get a working branch.
I dont have much time to work on this. But i'm curious
Is anyone planning to port surf for gtk3?
Sinceerly,
s.
33 matches
Mail list logo
