Greetings.
On Sat, 13 Oct 2012 07:18:23 +0200 Alexander Sedov
wrote:
> 2012/10/12 Christoph Lohmann <2...@r-36.net>:
> > Greetings.
> >
> > On Fri, 12 Oct 2012 19:42:11 +0200 Carlos Pita
> > wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I found this patch for the bug but I don't think it's right to just
> >> hide
>>> c->progress = 100; // <--- previously = 0
>>
>> Could you please send patches instead of complex inline gibberish?
Sorry, it was just 1 LOC and I wasn't even sure that the fix was the
right one. Here is the patch.
Regards
--
Carlos
surf-r246-0progress.diff
Description: B
2012/10/12 Christoph Lohmann <2...@r-36.net>:
> Greetings.
>
> On Fri, 12 Oct 2012 19:42:11 +0200 Carlos Pita
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I found this patch for the bug but I don't think it's right to just
>> hide the [0%] because there is the legitimate case when the page
>> hasn't started to load yet
Greetings.
On Fri, 12 Oct 2012 19:42:11 +0200 Carlos Pita wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I found this patch for the bug but I don't think it's right to just
> hide the [0%] because there is the legitimate case when the page
> hasn't started to load yet.
>
> http://www.digipedia.pl/usenet/thread/15253/9123/
>
Hi,
I found this patch for the bug but I don't think it's right to just
hide the [0%] because there is the legitimate case when the page
hasn't started to load yet.
http://www.digipedia.pl/usenet/thread/15253/9123/
So I did this instead:
case WEBKIT_LOAD_FINISHED:
c->progress = 100;
