Re: [dev] A chance for a suckless web?

2015-10-11 Thread FRIGN
On Sun, 11 Oct 2015 16:22:41 +0200 Christoph Lohmann <2...@r-36.net> wrote: Hey Christoph, > What do you comrades think? the web is almost a lost place. Nowadays, more and more people rely on third-party themes for their websites, and 99% of those have been developed with presentation in mind, n

Re: [dev] A chance for a suckless web?

2015-10-11 Thread Markus Teich
Heyho, Christoph Lohmann wrote: > I found the AMP project [0], which seems to be a standard to have easy > rendering of webpages on mobile devices. It only allows a subset of the HTML > tags but forces at least one Javascript script file to be run. If the content > could be displayed without t

Re: [dev] A chance for a suckless web?

2015-10-11 Thread Teodoro Santoni
2015-10-11 21:29 GMT+02:00, Nick : > Quoth hiro: >> I approve of Ben's comment. I read a lot of web articles on my >> e-reader these days. This way I waste less time in front of shitty web >> browsers (on immobile supercomputers) and have something consuming to >> do on the go. > > I recently got a

Re: [dev] A chance for a suckless web?

2015-10-11 Thread hiro
Right now I just use the "getpocket" service, which was preinstalled on both my kobo and firefox and also has a chrome extension. I assume that they have some clever algorithms for this. On a kindle I used the "send to kindle" extension which functions the same way. Before I realized what that po

Re: [dev] A chance for a suckless web?

2015-10-11 Thread Nick
Quoth hiro: > I approve of Ben's comment. I read a lot of web articles on my > e-reader these days. This way I waste less time in front of shitty web > browsers (on immobile supercomputers) and have something consuming to > do on the go. I recently got an e-reader and thought I should do something

Re: [dev] A chance for a suckless web?

2015-10-11 Thread hiro
I approve of Ben's comment. I read a lot of web articles on my e-reader these days. This way I waste less time in front of shitty web browsers (on immobile supercomputers) and have something consuming to do on the go. If I navigate through the shitty flash and .gif and CSS websites fast and efficie

Re: [dev] A chance for a suckless web?

2015-10-11 Thread Nick
Quoth tauto...@gmail.com: > I have considered making a reader mode in surf, and having a sort of > automatic mode for going into reader mode to make it more of a default. I did that, but not with an automatic reader mode thing. Haven't updated it for a while, but it should still just work most

Re: [dev] A chance for a suckless web?

2015-10-11 Thread tautolog
From: Christoph Lohmann Sent: Sunday, October 11, 2015 7:30 AM To: dev@suckless.org Reply To: dev mail list Subject: [dev] A chance for a suckless web? Greetings comrades, I found the AMP project [0], which seems to be a standard to have easy rendering of webpages on mobile devices. It only allows

Re: [dev] A chance for a suckless web?

2015-10-11 Thread Teodoro Santoni
2015-10-11 16:22 GMT+02:00, Christoph Lohmann <2...@r-36.net>: > Greetings comrades, > > I found the AMP project [0], which seems to be a standard to have easy > rendering of webpages on mobile devices. It only allows a subset of the > HTML tags but forces at least one Javascript script file t

Re: [dev] A chance for a suckless web?

2015-10-11 Thread Martti Kühne
I read about AMP some time this week. Reading into it, I think prohibiting all input elements except for the button seems like a huge step towards interactivity, so that websites could use image maps as on-screen keyboards and, like, build huge microsoft access like applications, webshops and all.

[dev] A chance for a suckless web?

2015-10-11 Thread Christoph Lohmann
Greetings comrades, I found the AMP project [0], which seems to be a standard to have easy rendering of webpages on mobile devices. It only allows a subset of the HTML tags but forces at least one Javascript script file to be run. If the content could be displayed without the JS being mandato