On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 11:09 PM, Dieter Plaetinck wrote:
> * stable sort. @CLS why I want this: say, for an application launcher, if I
> provide input to dmenu ordered by frequency, that means commands at
> the top are more important then those that come after. (where important
> means: is more l
On 12 September 2011 10:51, Connor Lane Smith wrote:
> Yeah, that's true. I think 'unstable' token matching would be quite
> slow (comparative to the rest of dmenu), and involve a lot of code
> ("). Maybe if someone's interested they can give it a shot.
In the attached patched I've replaced stand
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 10:05:16PM +0100, Rob wrote:
> I don't think this would be worth it, suckless tools are supposed to be
> lightweight, even someone who hasn't seen the code before can make
> changes, they don't have to be an expert at C, so merging a few lines
> here and there is no big deal
On 12 September 2011 14:26, Dieter Plaetinck wrote:
> I wonder if we could restructure the code a bit in such a way, that
> all patches can be independent again and user can combine the patches
> they want without hitting conflicts.
I don't think this would be worth it, suckless tools are suppose
> > > How do people feel about tok in mainline? Might be worth discussing.
I also like it. It is useful for filenames: zathura $(find *.pdf | dmenu -t)
Peter
--
sic dicit magister P
University of Toronto / Fordham University
Collins Hall B06; Office Hours TF10-12
http://individual.utoronto.ca/
On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 16:34:04 +0200
sta...@cs.tu-berlin.de wrote:
> * Connor Lane Smith [2011-09-12 15:52]:
> > How do people feel about tok in mainline? Might be worth discussing.
>
> token matching? almost meaningless for program names. very helpful for
> natural language, structured entries (d
* Connor Lane Smith [2011-09-12 15:52]:
> How do people feel about tok in mainline? Might be worth discussing.
token matching? almost meaningless for program names. very helpful for
natural language, structured entries (directory tree, URIs). So:
+1
--
stanio_
On 12 September 2011 14:26, Dieter Plaetinck wrote:
> pushed where?
http://hg.suckless.org/sites
Anyone can commit, but we pull it to the actual site manually. (And I
don't have my key atm.) So feel free to add stuff yourself. :]
> I wonder if we could restructure the code a bit in such a way,
On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 10:51:48 +0100
Connor Lane Smith wrote:
> On 12 September 2011 10:20, Dieter Plaetinck
> wrote:
> > Thank you for that bloat patch!
> > I didn't realise it could be this simple.
>
> dmenu is very easy to hack. ;)
>
> > I did see a bug:
> > when using token matching, it seem
On 12 September 2011 10:20, Dieter Plaetinck wrote:
> Thank you for that bloat patch!
> I didn't realise it could be this simple.
dmenu is very easy to hack. ;)
> I did see a bug:
> when using token matching, it seems dmenu will always do stable sort, even
> when -s is not given.
Yeah, that's
On Sun, 11 Sep 2011 22:49:38 +0100
Connor Lane Smith wrote:
> Attached are two diffs, my token patch updated to 4.4, and a bloat
> patch ;) which provides everything you wanted.
>
> cls
Thank you for that bloat patch!
I didn't realise it could be this simple.
I did see a bug:
when using token m
Attached are two diffs, my token patch updated to 4.4, and a bloat
patch ;) which provides everything you wanted.
cls
diff -r f6b31468f983 dmenu.c
--- a/dmenu.c Sun Jul 24 20:04:58 2011 +0100
+++ b/dmenu.c Sun Sep 11 22:36:01 2011 +0100
@@ -30,7 +30,8 @@
static void grabkeyboard(void);
static vo
On Thu, 8 Sep 2011 15:09:45 -0400
Peter John Hartman wrote:
> I'm a lazy list reader, but aren't all of those already in dmenu
> tip? Can't you list the features that *aren't* in "dmenu as we know
> it"?
not included:
* multi select, but the argument of Hiro (that this is not really needed) ma
Then delete for gods sake!
On 09.09.2011, Connor Lane Smith wrote:
> On 9 September 2011 10:29, hiro <23h...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>> Couldn't you just run dmenu in a loop instead of using multiselect?
>
> Yes.
>
> $ while foo | dmenu; do :; done
>
> cls
>
>
On 9 September 2011 10:29, hiro <23h...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Couldn't you just run dmenu in a loop instead of using multiselect?
Yes.
$ while foo | dmenu; do :; done
cls
1[1],2[null],3[2], right? This sucks.
Couldn't you just run dmenu in a loop instead of using multiselect?
On 8 September 2011 20:09, Peter John Hartman
wrote:
> I'm a lazy list reader, but aren't all of those already in dmenu tip? Can't
> you list the features that *aren't* in "dmenu as we know it"?
The list would be,
1. "XMMS-style" token matching
2. "Stable sort"
3. Multi-select
1 and 3 are b
what the fuck is multi select, token matching and best match?
On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 21:00:31 +0200, Dieter Plaetinck wrote:
> Hi,
> in an attempt to get a dmenu that includes all features I want, I've been
> trying to combine patches from various sources to various versions of dmenu.
> This has proven to be a pain, as patches conflict with each other (or
On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 09:00:31PM +0200, Dieter Plaetinck wrote:
> Hi,
> in an attempt to get a dmenu that includes all features I want, I've been
> trying to combine patches from various sources to various versions of dmenu.
> This has proven to be a pain, as patches conflict with each other (or
Hi,
in an attempt to get a dmenu that includes all features I want, I've been
trying to combine patches from various sources to various versions of dmenu.
This has proven to be a pain, as patches conflict with each other (or sometimes
apply, but still break functionality) and/or loose compatibili
21 matches
Mail list logo
