On 10/24/11 at 10:30am, Kurt H Maier wrote:
users don't give a shit about software licensing
I do.
--
# Kurt H Maier
--
Somebody claiming to be mikshaw wrote:
From: Kurt H Maier karmaf...@gmail.com
only an idiot compares a software license to slavery.
As far as the cc-nd license RMS apparently prefers for his own audio, I
fully agree this is hypocritical and wrong.
Not to wade into a flametroll war, but for
So I guess that means no auto-tuned Richard Stallman huh?
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 10:46 AM, Stephen Paul Weber
singpol...@singpolyma.net wrote:
Somebody claiming to be mikshaw wrote:
From: Kurt H Maier karmaf...@gmail.com
only an idiot compares a software license to slavery.
As far as
The GPL is nothing more than Richard Stallman's highly encumbered
temper-tantrum against propriety software, it has almost nothing to do
with true freedom.
Eloquently sums up my issue with the GPL itself as well as the FSF in
general.
- Original Message -
From: Al Gest
In the real world a person's freedoms are very much decided by their
ability to obtain those freedoms. That might not fall in line with
your moralistic ideologies, but it is reality.
The GPL is nothing more than Richard Stallman's highly
On Sun, 23 Oct 2011 14:54:18 +0200
Andreas Krennmair a...@synflood.at wrote:
Primarily, the GPL balances freedom towards the agenda of the FSF and
their specific interpretation of the term freedom.
-ak
Copyleft or not? This is never ending discussion, mostly ideological.
GPL has many
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 2:00 PM, mikshaw mrb...@yahoo.com wrote:
If you're stifling another person's freedoms, you're doing something bad.
Not giving you stuff is not stifling your freedom.
They're free only up to the point when a dev decides to turn the code
into a proprietary product...
At
On 24 October 2011 14:00, mikshaw mrb...@yahoo.com wrote:
Unrestricted freedom is impossible
And there's no such thing as restricted freedom.
I just disagree with people who support those licenses while rabidly
claiming the GPL to be some kind of evil cancer.
But the GPL is *designed*
Greetings comrades.
On 24.10.2011 20:10, Corey Thomasson wrote:
On 24 October 2011 14:00, mikshaw mrb...@yahoo.com wrote:
Unrestricted freedom is impossible
And there's no such thing as restricted freedom.
There is positive discrimination too.
I just disagree with people who support
- Original Message -
From: Jakub Lach jakub_l...@mailplus.pl
To: dev mail list dev@suckless.org
Cc:
Sent: Friday, October 21, 2011 4:11 AM
Subject: Re: [dev] Anti-GPL hipsters
Kurt H Maier karmaf...@gmail.com :
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 8:32 PM, Stanley Lieber
stanley.lie
* mikshaw mrb...@yahoo.com [2011-10-23 14:50]:
Claiming a person's freedoms are decided by their ability to obtain those
freedoms? Very wrong. Just as laws against slavery are there to balance the
freedoms of all, GPL is there to balance the freedoms of all users devs,
present and future.
On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 8:47 AM, mikshaw mrb...@yahoo.com wrote:
No.
Claiming a person's freedoms are decided by their ability to obtain those
freedoms? Very wrong. Just as laws against slavery are there to balance the
freedoms of all, GPL is there to balance the freedoms of all users
fucking pussies around?
On 10/23/11, Kurt H Maier karmaf...@gmail.com wrote:
that is a load of pretentious, presumptuous shit, mrblog, and nobody
involved with the creation of the GPL is qualified to judge the needs
of all users devs, present and future.
I second that. Richard Stallman's love for cc-by-nd is enough
I heard him ask recorders of a speech of his to license recordings
under a no-derivs-allowed CC license this summer (in Fjölbrautaskólinn
við Ármúla, Iceland). These recordings tend to get lost and forgotten
in cutting, encoding and uploading. I'll try to see if this one got
online, and dig it up.
On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 6:12 PM, Bjartur Thorlacius
svartma...@gmail.com wrote:
I heard him ask recorders of a speech of his to license recordings
under a no-derivs-allowed CC license this summer (in Fjölbrautaskólinn
við Ármúla, Iceland).
Here's an example of some film of his under cc-by-nd:
I saw a beggar a few days ago and didn't give him any money - he
reminded me of RMS.
Kurt H Maier karmaf...@gmail.com :
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 8:32 PM, Stanley Lieber
stanley.lie...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 7:08 PM, Claude Lelouch lelou...@rocketmail.com
wrote:
Why don't I have the freedom to own slaves?
because you don't have the strength to take
I need a +1 button on Stanley's reply... :P
Excerpts from Stanley Lieber's message of 2011-10-20 20:32:46 -0400:
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 7:08 PM, Claude Lelouch lelou...@rocketmail.com
wrote:
Why don't I have the freedom to own slaves?
because you don't have the strength to take them.
Why don't I have the freedom to own slaves?
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 7:08 PM, Claude Lelouch lelou...@rocketmail.com wrote:
Why don't I have the freedom to own slaves?
because you don't have the strength to take them.
-sl
The gpl is slavery.
On Oct 20, 2011 8:09 PM, Claude Lelouch lelou...@rocketmail.com wrote:
Why don't I have the freedom to own slaves?
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 8:32 PM, Stanley Lieber
stanley.lie...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 7:08 PM, Claude Lelouch lelou...@rocketmail.com
wrote:
Why don't I have the freedom to own slaves?
because you don't have the strength to take them.
-sl
this is the greatest email ever
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 8:32 PM, Stanley Lieber stanley.lie...@gmail.comwrote:
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 7:08 PM, Claude Lelouch lelou...@rocketmail.com
wrote:
Why don't I have the freedom to own slaves?
because you don't have the strength to take them.
-sl
Can we give this guy a medal
24 matches
Mail list logo
