Re: [dev] Hall of shame of the web

2012-11-19 Thread Martti Kühne
On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 10:08:43PM +, Ethan Grammatikidis wrote: I was already thinking Google before you added this. Zombie thread is making gurgling noises... :D pgpDydHnfmdne.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [dev] Hall of shame of the web

2012-11-19 Thread Raphael Proust
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 7:28 PM, Martti Kühne mysat...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 10:08:43PM +, Ethan Grammatikidis wrote: I was already thinking Google before you added this. Zombie thread is making gurgling noises... :D Shoot it in the head. Twice! --

Re: [dev] Hall of shame of the web

2012-11-17 Thread Ethan Grammatikidis
On Sun, 30 Sep 2012 00:25:16 +0200 Marc Weber marco-owe...@gmx.de wrote: resources * expected_users = waste of energy Thus you should also take into account how often a site is actually viewed by users. Best would be making browsers show a this page is going to drawn your battery soon

Re: [dev] Hall of shame of the web

2012-09-30 Thread Anselm R Garbe
On 29 September 2012 23:18, Christoph Lohmann 2...@r-36.net wrote: What would you think about some kind of hall of shame for websites that waste most resources? An easy measurement would be running surf and all There are more important things to do. I think we all agree that today's web

Re: [dev] Hall of shame of the web

2012-09-30 Thread hiro
Best would be making browsers show a this page is going to drawn your battery soon hints .. That's what your CPU fan is for. Mine only spins up when I forgot to disable js.

Re: [dev] Hall of shame of the web

2012-09-30 Thread hiro
that hall of shame is called google. we should all get back to using gopher or telnet. On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 11:18 PM, Christoph Lohmann 2...@r-36.net wrote: Greetings comrades. What would you think about some kind of hall of shame for websites that waste most resources? An easy

Re: [dev] Hall of shame of the web

2012-09-30 Thread Bjartur Thorlacius
hiro wrote: that hall of shame is called google. we should all get back to using gopher or telnet. Yes. Because Gopher and Telnet are superior to HTTP and SSH. /s

[dev] Hall of shame of the web

2012-09-29 Thread Christoph Lohmann
Greetings comrades. What would you think about some kind of hall of shame for websites that waste most resources? An easy measurement would be running surf and all the plugins in its own group and then measure that memory, cpu, wakup and power usage vs. plain surf. Maybe adding some

Re: [dev] Hall of shame of the web

2012-09-29 Thread mrpantoufle
waste most resources? An easy measurement would be running surf and all the plugins in its own group and then measure that memory, cpu, wakup and power usage vs. plain surf. Maybe adding some javascript to do some »average usage« would be nice too. What do you mean by « all the plug-ing 

Re: [dev] Hall of shame of the web

2012-09-29 Thread Bjartur Thorlacius
mrpantou...@upyum.com wrote: What do you mean by « all the plug-ing » ? Only Flash or would you like to include Silverlight, VLC… ? All the plugins the page requests, presumably.

Re: [dev] Hall of shame of the web

2012-09-29 Thread ilf
On 09-29 23:18, Christoph Lohmann wrote: What would you think about some kind of hall of shame for websites that waste most resources? Indexing the parts of the web that don't suck is less work. -- ilf Über 80 Millionen Deutsche benutzen keine Konsole. Klick dich nicht weg!

Re: [dev] Hall of shame of the web

2012-09-29 Thread Marc Weber
resources * expected_users = waste of energy Thus you should also take into account how often a site is actually viewed by users. Best would be making browsers show a this page is going to drawn your battery soon hints .. Marc Weber

Re: [dev] Hall of shame of the web

2012-09-29 Thread Kurt H Maier
a, did safari crash again?