Re: [dev] Holding st after a command has completed

2019-04-14 Thread Hadrien Lacour
On Sun, Apr 14, 2019 at 03:24:34AM +0300, Ivan "Rambius" Ivanov wrote: > Hello, > > The st terminal has -e option that executes a specific command instead > of the shell. However, st closes immediately after the command has > completed. Is it possible to hold the st's window after the command > has

Re: [dev] Holding st after a command has completed

2019-04-13 Thread Ivan "Rambius" Ivanov
Hello, On Sun, Apr 14, 2019 at 4:28 AM Alexander Krotov wrote: > > On 4/14/19 3:24 AM, Ivan "Rambius" Ivanov wrote: > > Hello, > > > > The st terminal has -e option that executes a specific command instead > > of the shell. However, st closes immediately after the command has > > completed. Is it

Re: [dev] Holding st after a command has completed

2019-04-13 Thread Alexander Krotov
On 4/14/19 3:24 AM, Ivan "Rambius" Ivanov wrote: > Hello, > > The st terminal has -e option that executes a specific command instead > of the shell. However, st closes immediately after the command has > completed. Is it possible to hold the st's window after the command > has finished? That is si

[dev] Holding st after a command has completed

2019-04-13 Thread Ivan "Rambius" Ivanov
Hello, The st terminal has -e option that executes a specific command instead of the shell. However, st closes immediately after the command has completed. Is it possible to hold the st's window after the command has finished? That is similar to xterm's -hold command. Thank you for your responses