* Anselm R Garbe 2016-03-06 15:56
> I agree, though this is not stricly a problem with monolithic approaches
> either.
> In the end you have to trust the process governor to limit the
> privileges of a process (or thread) to its specification/requirement.
> If the governor is only one SPOF
On 6 March 2016 at 15:39, wrote:
> * Anselm R Garbe 2016-03-06 14:20
>> On 6 March 2016 at 13:47, robin wrote:
>> > Microkernels defenitely resonates with the unix philosophy "do one thing
>> > and
>> > do it well".
>> > Having everything,
* Anselm R Garbe 2016-03-06 14:20
> On 6 March 2016 at 13:47, robin wrote:
> > Microkernels defenitely resonates with the unix philosophy "do one thing and
> > do it well".
> > Having everything, except FUSE and such, in the kernel is doing more than
> > one thing.
>
On 6 March 2016 at 13:47, robin wrote:
> Microkernels defenitely resonates with the unix philosophy "do one thing and
> do it well".
> Having everything, except FUSE and such, in the kernel is doing more than
> one thing.
IMHO the architectural decision for a
On Fri, Mar 04, 2016 at 11:47:48PM +0100, FRIGN wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Mar 2016 14:43:40 -0500
> Greg Reagle wrote:
>
> > The connection to suckless is that the author has strong minimalist and
> > anti-bloat tendencies.
>
> when did this turn into a Hacker News here?
>
> --