Mattias Andrée writes:
> The absolutely works thing with free software development
> is all those mailing lists clobbering your inbox.
>
> Mailing lists also adds another complexity on top of an
> already horridly sucking group of protocols.
>
> I suggest switching to NNTP (which most e-mail clie
On Sat, 12 Dec 2015 10:51:23 +0100
hiro <23h...@gmail.com> wrote:
> yes. use IRC then.
>
>
Not quite the same thing. Irrelevant.
El Sat, 12 Dec 2015 22:13:06 +0100, hiro escribió:
> Anyways, I agree with you that mail isn't perfect, I don't know what big
> difference NNTP makes though.
I prefer NNTP for the following reasons:
You don't have to send subscribe or unsubscribe messages. If you want to
access the archives, yo
El Sun, 13 Dec 2015 11:35:27 +0100, FRIGN escribió:
> On Sun, 13 Dec 2015 10:29:02 + (UTC)
> No, it's proof that you don't understand how to deal with IMAP. And
> regarding size: My _entire_ suckless inbox which reaches back nearly two
> years is only 68M, which is a joke.
> I'm sure Google d
El Sun, 13 Dec 2015 11:50:50 +0100, hiro escribió:
> if your inbox is too small just use gmail for your mailing lists. i feel
> like it's just a different branding, both gmail and gmane do the same
> job to me.
It is not as much of a problem of inbox size as it is of having to deal
with a lot of
One disadvantage with with NNTP is that the current
standard tools for sending packages are for e-mail
and mailing lists. Tools for NNTP has too be added.
Of course, you can always send patches manually.
On Sun, 13 Dec 2015 13:23:27 + (UTC)
Black Rider wrote:
> El Sun, 13 Dec 2015 11:35:27
On Fri, 11 Dec 2015 22:12:47 +0100
Christian Neukirchen wrote:
> Mattias Andrée writes:
>
> > The absolutely works thing with free software
> > development is all those mailing lists clobbering your
> > inbox.
> >
> > Mailing lists also adds another complexity on top of an
> > already horridly
yes. use IRC then.
Anyways, I agree with you that mail isn't perfect, I don't know what
big difference NNTP makes though.
On Sun, 13 Dec 2015 10:29:02 + (UTC)
Black Rider wrote:
> In a regular mailing list, you are sent 100% of the traffic the mailing
> list gets. That is bad news for your INBOX storage limits. You can use
> smart filtering and scheduled INBOX cleanup, but the fact you are using
> tools for s
if your inbox is too small just use gmail for your mailing lists.
i feel like it's just a different branding, both gmail and gmane do
the same job to me.
> It is interesting to note that, often, when you don't like a certain tool
> as much as other person, the other person will automatically tell you
> that you don't know how to use it.
we here at suckless are marginal enough not to care about the
statistical analysis you made with stupid people ar
12 matches
Mail list logo