2022-04-28 9:38 GMT+02:00, Страхиња Радић :
> In my opinion, dark mode is unnecessary and favored by mainstream
> "webdevs".
>
Divide et impera (light vs dark mode) is the easiest solution they
could come up for soothing the look'n'feel hell in which desktop
vendors throwed themselves into.
On Thu, 28 Apr 2022 18:14:14 +0200
Hiltjo Posthuma wrote:
Dear Hiltjo,
> Sure I don't mind you added them back.
> With the inverted colors they are visible here.
alright, cool. :)
Thanks also for adding the dark theme.
With best regards
Laslo
On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 12:19:07PM +0200, Laslo Hunhold wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Apr 2022 08:34:36 +0600
> NRK wrote:
>
> Dear NRK,
>
> > Recently noticed that the dwm and st logo was removed from their
> > homepages[0][1].
> >
> > I was wondering if there's any specific reason for that, or if there
Quoting Страхиња Радић (2022-04-28 05:28:29)
> On 22/04/28 12:19, Laslo Hunhold wrote:
> > What do the others think?
>
> I also like them, I think they contribute to overall visual identity of
> suckless programs and suckless.org and should be reincorporated into the
> website.
I think the logo
On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 01:06:05PM +0200, Laslo Hunhold wrote:
> #main img[src$=svg] {
> filter: invert(1);
> }
>
> All within #main that are svg's are inverted in dark mode.
> Granted it makes use of a filter, which is not supported everywhere,
> but given prefers-color
On Thu, 28 Apr 2022 09:38:09 +0200
Страхиња Радић wrote:
Dear Страхиња,
> This can be remedied with CSS which applies white background to logos
> (perhaps with some padding: to also give a bit of a
> border).
>
> In my opinion, dark mode is unnecessary and favored by mainstream
> "webdevs".
I
On 28.04.22 12:19, Laslo Hunhold wrote:
On Thu, 28 Apr 2022 08:34:36 +0600
NRK wrote:
Dear NRK,
Recently noticed that the dwm and st logo was removed from their
homepages[0][1].
I was wondering if there's any specific reason for that, or if there's
plan for a new logo(s)?
I atleast really l
On 22/04/28 12:19, Laslo Hunhold wrote:
> What do the others think?
I also like them, I think they contribute to overall visual identity of
suckless programs and suckless.org and should be reincorporated into the
website.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Thu, 28 Apr 2022 13:53:54 +0600
NRK wrote:
Dear NRK,
> Ah, that makes sense. But wouldn't it make sense to remove the logos
> from *all* are projects then?
>
> Also since the logos are just svgs, I *think* it should be possible to
> override the color of the "fill" dynmaically via css (?) If
On Thu, 28 Apr 2022 08:34:36 +0600
NRK wrote:
Dear NRK,
> Recently noticed that the dwm and st logo was removed from their
> homepages[0][1].
>
> I was wondering if there's any specific reason for that, or if there's
> plan for a new logo(s)?
>
> I atleast really liked the current logos, as th
On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 09:29:43AM +0200, Hiltjo Posthuma wrote:
> Recently dark mode CSS support was added to the site.
>
> It was reported on IRC the logo's were not visible with them.
Ah, that makes sense. But wouldn't it make sense to remove the logos
from *all* are projects then?
Also since
On 22/04/28 09:29, Hiltjo Posthuma wrote:
> Recently dark mode CSS support was added to the site.
>
> It was reported on IRC the logo's were not visible with them.
This can be remedied with CSS which applies white background to logos (perhaps
with some padding: to also give a bit of a border).
On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 08:34:36AM +0600, NRK wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Recently noticed that the dwm and st logo was removed from their
> homepages[0][1].
>
> I was wondering if there's any specific reason for that, or if there's
> plan for a new logo(s)?
>
> I atleast really liked the current logos, as
13 matches
Mail list logo
