Re: [dev] debugging sj

2015-12-04 Thread Greg Reagle
On 12/04/2015 12:57 AM, Jan Klemkow wrote: I wrote ucspi-tee[1] to do this job for me. But I think there is a similar tool of djb's tool chain, that does it, too. Okay yes I can compile and run your program ucspi-tee. But how exactly do I use it? This is how I (successfully) use sj now:

Re: [dev] debugging sj

2015-12-04 Thread Jan Klemkow
On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 11:21:17AM -0500, Greg Reagle wrote: > On 12/04/2015 12:57 AM, Jan Klemkow wrote: > >I wrote ucspi-tee[1] to do this job for me. But I think there is a > >similar tool of djb's tool chain, that does it, too. > > Okay yes I can compile and run your program ucspi-tee. But

Re: [dev] debugging sj

2015-12-03 Thread Jan Klemkow
On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 11:35:46AM -0500, Greg Reagle wrote: > On 12/01/2015 10:55 AM, Greg Reagle wrote: > >I don't experience any bugs in sj, but I would like to see the raw XML > >messages that are sent back and forth via sj, messaged, iqd, and > >presenced, in order to be able to understand

[dev] debugging sj

2015-12-01 Thread Greg Reagle
I don't experience any bugs in sj, but I would like to see the raw XML messages that are sent back and forth via sj, messaged, iqd, and presenced, in order to be able to understand better. These programs write to "in" files (named pipes). So what is the best (easiest, most convenient) way to

Re: [dev] debugging sj

2015-12-01 Thread Greg Reagle
On 12/01/2015 10:55 AM, Greg Reagle wrote: I don't experience any bugs in sj, but I would like to see the raw XML messages that are sent back and forth via sj, messaged, iqd, and presenced, in order to be able to understand better. These programs write to "in" files (named pipes). So what is