I've packaged dmc for arch linux:
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=39955
This was before I tried it and could not send or recieve mail. Maybe I
packaged it too early?
I would also like to know if I'm missing something.
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 3:43 AM, pancake wrote:
> dmc -e maybe?
>
> O
http://i.imgur.com/I2lJa.png
http://gitorious.org/element/element/blobs/master/ruby/W/mail.rb
i'm pretty happy with this - if you have feature suggestions or questions mail
me offlist
Sorry, I didn't send the whole cmdlist but just the relevant part. Of course
I have run -e before. Just asking if it should work (dmc).
Dne 16.8.2010 9:41 "pancake" napsal/a:
dmc -e maybe?
On 16/08/2010, at 09:03, Martin Kopta wrote:
> I have read it many times. Am I missing something?
>>
>
dmc -e maybe?
On 16/08/2010, at 09:03, Martin Kopta wrote:
> I have read it many times. Am I missing something?
>
>> Dne 16.8.2010 1:24 "Jacob Todd" napsal/a:
>>
>> On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 08:15:41PM +0200, Martin Kopta wrote:
>> > does that thing actualy works?
>>
>> Read the README.
>
I have read it many times. Am I missing something?
Dne 16.8.2010 1:24 "Jacob Todd" napsal/a:
On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 08:15:41PM +0200, Martin Kopta wrote:
> does that thing actualy works?
Read the README.
On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 08:15:41PM +0200, Martin Kopta wrote:
> does that thing actualy works?
Read the README.
pgpkPcgHLLMtI.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Still waiting for dmc. Mutt sucks. Not less.
$ dmc start
$ echo $?
0
$ pgrep dmc
$
does that thing actualy works?
dum8d0g
pgpLDMb9ZP0aO.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Sun, 06 Jun 2010 18:30:17 +0200
Moritz Wilhelmy wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have been using nmh for quite some time, and now I wonder if dmc is able to
> read the folder format nmh uses for managing mails. If not, is it planned to
> implement it? I'd like to keep my folders compatible to nmh and woul
Hi,
I have been using nmh for quite some time, and now I wonder if dmc is able to
read the folder format nmh uses for managing mails. If not, is it planned to
implement it? I'd like to keep my folders compatible to nmh and would
preferrably not convert them back to maildir.
Kind regards,
Moritz
On Wed, Dec 02, 2009 20:09:58 +0100, pancake wrote:
> Let me know what do you think about it. And feel free to hack it,
> test it, blame it or so :)
>
> Have fun!
>
I'm really impressed. This looks like a great mail client.
Once I figure how why I can't send or recieve messages, you could expect
It's quite some long time I don't give any news about dmc.
Nibble and me did some work on it, so it's partially usable, but
actually we're out of
time to continue it. For this reason I have decided to publish the first
release of dmc.
DMC stands for Dynamic Mail Client. The project started as
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 5:03 AM, Moritz Wilhelmy wrote:
> what about sshfs?
sshfs is horribly annoying on high-latency connections; if pancake is
right and I can just "ssh u...@host dmc-maildir" or whatever, and the
local controller app will tap in to that, then this is already my
favorite mail
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 12:14:47AM -0600, Kurt H Maier wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 4:49 PM, pancake wrote:
> > - mbox: 150 LOC
> > - mdir: 80 LOC
>
> Please consider supporting mbox/mdir access over ssh. This was the
> one redeeming feature of sup[1], but of course they broke it and have
>
On Nov 10, 2009, at 8:37 AM, Uriel wrote:
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 11:49 PM, pancake wrote:
Hello everyone!
I'm writing this lines because the delayed release of dmc that
was announced few mails ago.
The reason for the lagged release is because of the lack of time
to finish the design and i
On Nov 10, 2009, at 7:14 AM, Kurt H Maier wrote:
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 4:49 PM, pancake wrote:
- mbox: 150 LOC
- mdir: 80 LOC
Please consider supporting mbox/mdir access over ssh. This was the
one redeeming feature of sup[1], but of course they broke it and have
inexplicably left it b
On Nov 10, 2009, at 6:08 AM, Anders Andersson
wrote:
Some comments:
Networking:
- ssl (no certificate check yet)
Aren't there ssl-wrappers already? I'm thinking of stunnel, but maybe
that doesn't work in this setting.
Yep. See the pipeline doc. Originally I was using a pipe to openss
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 11:49 PM, pancake wrote:
> Hello everyone!
>
> I'm writing this lines because the delayed release of dmc that
> was announced few mails ago.
>
> The reason for the lagged release is because of the lack of time
> to finish the design and implementation :(
>
> We plan to relea
2009/11/10, Kurt H Maier :
> Please consider supporting mbox/mdir access over ssh. This was the
> one redeeming feature of sup[1], but of course they broke it and have
> inexplicably left it broken for years in the source. ssh+maildir
> obviates imap and pop3.
use sshfs
> --
>
> # Kurt H Maie
On 11/10/09, Anders Andersson wrote:
> Why rewrite it in C? What will you gain with this? There's a lot of
> code in the shell interpreter, and everyone will have one (even in an
> embedded environment you'll have busybox ash or similar). Use the code
> that's already there. :)
>
usually true but
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 4:49 PM, pancake wrote:
> - mbox: 150 LOC
> - mdir: 80 LOC
Please consider supporting mbox/mdir access over ssh. This was the
one redeeming feature of sup[1], but of course they broke it and have
inexplicably left it broken for years in the source. ssh+maildir
obviates
Some comments:
> Networking:
> - ssl (no certificate check yet)
Aren't there ssl-wrappers already? I'm thinking of stunnel, but maybe
that doesn't work in this setting.
> Addressbook support:
> - dmc can read/edit a simple addressbook file
Is this necessary?
read:$ mail `grep "cool dude" ~/.
Hello everyone!
I'm writing this lines because the delayed release of dmc that
was announced few mails ago.
The reason for the lagged release is because of the lack of time
to finish the design and implementation :(
We plan to release it before the end of the year ;) hopefully
before the end of
22 matches
Mail list logo
