Re: [dev] dwm default bindings

2009-07-24 Thread Donald Allen
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 8:19 AM, Szabolcs Nagy wrote: > On 7/23/09, Donald Allen wrote: >> fix it, when (in my opinion) a reasonable fix exists (change >> alt- to ctrl-alt-), even for keyboards >> without the Windows key. > > editing ctrl-alt out from the default config is more work than just > ch

Re: [dev] dwm default bindings

2009-07-23 Thread Donald Allen
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 11:44 AM, Donald Allen wrote: > On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 11:27 AM, Donald Allen wrote: >> On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 8:19 AM, Szabolcs Nagy wrote: >>> On 7/23/09, Donald Allen wrote: fix it, when (in my opinion) a reasonable fix exists (change alt- to ctrl-alt-), even

Re: [dev] dwm default bindings

2009-07-23 Thread Donald Allen
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 11:27 AM, Donald Allen wrote: > On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 8:19 AM, Szabolcs Nagy wrote: >> On 7/23/09, Donald Allen wrote: >>> fix it, when (in my opinion) a reasonable fix exists (change >>> alt- to ctrl-alt-), even for keyboards >>> without the Windows key. >> >> editing ct

Re: [dev] dwm default bindings

2009-07-23 Thread Mate Nagy
> > anyway, i could agree with the change if it's just > > #define MODKEY Mod1Mask|ControlMask imho the best default is Mod1 - it's a lot less annoying than Ctrl+Alt, in apps Esc+key can often be used instead. Ctrl+Alt is not a good default, because it'll induce EMACS-fingers and scare off the use

Re: [dev] dwm default bindings

2009-07-23 Thread Niki Yoshiuchi
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 11:27 AM, Donald Allen wrote: > > > I believe this would have the effect of changing alt- to > ctrl-alt- and also alt-shift- to > ctrl-alt-shift-, yes? > > If so, that makes sense to me. It preserves the current consistency, > which my fix does not, so in that way it is les

Re: [dev] dwm default bindings

2009-07-23 Thread Donald Allen
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 8:19 AM, Szabolcs Nagy wrote: > On 7/23/09, Donald Allen wrote: >> fix it, when (in my opinion) a reasonable fix exists (change >> alt- to ctrl-alt-), even for keyboards >> without the Windows key. > > editing ctrl-alt out from the default config is more work than just > ch

Re: [dev] dwm default bindings

2009-07-23 Thread Szabolcs Nagy
On 7/23/09, Donald Allen wrote: > fix it, when (in my opinion) a reasonable fix exists (change > alt- to ctrl-alt-), even for keyboards > without the Windows key. editing ctrl-alt out from the default config is more work than just changing the mod key definition > window manager with defaults th

Re: [dev] dwm default bindings

2009-07-23 Thread Anselm R Garbe
2009/7/23 Donald Allen : > On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 5:13 AM, Anselm R Garbe wrote: >> We got config.h for that. The default key bindings won't change ;) > > As I observed when I began this thread, your defaults conflict > directly with a well-established UI convention of many applications > (the und

Re: [dev] dwm default bindings

2009-07-23 Thread Donald Allen
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 5:13 AM, Anselm R Garbe wrote: > 2009/7/22 Donald Allen : >> I think the default key bindings for dwm are a unfortunate in some >> cases. For example, alt-f, a natural choice for *f*loat mode, >> conflicts with pulling down the File menu in many applications from >> the keyb

Re: [dev] dwm default bindings

2009-07-23 Thread Donald Allen
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 4:18 AM, Jimmy Tang wrote: > On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 08:07:42PM -0400, Donald Allen wrote: >> On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 7:23 PM, Donald Chai wrote: >> > On Jul 22, 2009, at 2:22 PM, Donald Allen wrote: >> > >> >> On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 3:25 PM, Michael wrote: >> >>> >> >>> Do

Re: [dev] dwm default bindings

2009-07-23 Thread Anselm R Garbe
2009/7/22 Donald Allen : > I think the default key bindings for dwm are a unfortunate in some > cases. For example, alt-f, a natural choice for *f*loat mode, > conflicts with pulling down the File menu in many applications from > the keyboard. alt-T similarly conflicts with using the Tools menu in

Re: [dev] dwm default bindings

2009-07-23 Thread Antoni Grzymala
Donald Allen dixit (2009-07-22, 20:07): > > people change the setting to Mod2Mask to use the Windows key, but the > > current default of Mod1Mask will work out of the box for anyone who doesn't > > have a Windows/Apple/diamond key. > > That's true. But it also conflicts with a widely-available UI

Re: [dev] dwm default bindings

2009-07-23 Thread Premysl Hruby
On (22/07/09 10:30), Donald Allen wrote: > Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2009 10:30:34 -0400 > From: Donald Allen > To: dev mail list > Subject: [dev] dwm default bindings > List-Id: dev mail list > > I think the default key bindings for dwm are a unfortunate in some > cases. For e

Re: [dev] dwm default bindings

2009-07-23 Thread Jimmy Tang
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 08:07:42PM -0400, Donald Allen wrote: > On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 7:23 PM, Donald Chai wrote: > > On Jul 22, 2009, at 2:22 PM, Donald Allen wrote: > > > >> On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 3:25 PM, Michael wrote: > >>> > >>> Donald Allen wrote: > > I realize that these bindin

Re: [dev] dwm default bindings

2009-07-22 Thread Donald Allen
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 7:23 PM, Donald Chai wrote: > On Jul 22, 2009, at 2:22 PM, Donald Allen wrote: > >> On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 3:25 PM, Michael wrote: >>> >>> Donald Allen wrote: I realize that these bindings can be changed. But that requires some work (and knowledge of C) on th

Re: [dev] dwm default bindings

2009-07-22 Thread Donald Chai
On Jul 22, 2009, at 2:22 PM, Donald Allen wrote: On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 3:25 PM, Michael wrote: Donald Allen wrote: I realize that these bindings can be changed. But that requires some work (and knowledge of C) on the part of the user. I'm talking about the choice of the defaults. Perhaps the

Re: [dev] dwm default bindings

2009-07-22 Thread Randy Morris
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 05:22:22PM -0400, Donald Allen wrote: > On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 3:25 PM, Michael wrote: > > Donald Allen wrote: > >> I realize that these bindings can be changed. But that requires some > >> work (and knowledge of C) on the part of the user. I'm talking about > >> the choice

Re: [dev] dwm default bindings

2009-07-22 Thread Donald Allen
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 3:25 PM, Michael wrote: > Donald Allen wrote: >> I realize that these bindings can be changed. But that requires some >> work (and knowledge of C) on the part of the user. I'm talking about >> the choice of the defaults. Perhaps the keys modified by alt should >> instead be

Re: [dev] dwm default bindings

2009-07-22 Thread Michael
Donald Allen wrote: > I realize that these bindings can be changed. But that requires some > work (and knowledge of C) on the part of the user. I'm talking about > the choice of the defaults. Perhaps the keys modified by alt should > instead be modified by ctrl-alt by default? And similarly, alt-sh

Re: [dev] dwm default bindings

2009-07-22 Thread Donald Allen
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 11:19 AM, Donald Allen wrote: > On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 11:13 AM, Donald Allen wrote: >> On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 10:42 AM, Julien Pecqueur >> (JPEC) wrote: >>> I think the ctrl+alt combinaison suck : you need two hands for killing a >>> client... >> >> Not so, at least on m

Re: [dev] dwm default bindings

2009-07-22 Thread Antoni Grzymala
Julien Pecqueur (JPEC) dixit (2009-07-22, 16:42): > Finally a dwm user should don't use suck - more application wich use > the alt key ! ^^ Like readline(3)? For that reason alone, it's pretty hopeless to use alt as the wm modifier. I'm in the MOD4 (winkey on pc keyboards) team, too. It doesn't

Re: [dev] dwm default bindings

2009-07-22 Thread Donald Allen
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 11:36 AM, Scytrin dai Kinthra wrote: > I work on a wide variety of platforms and keyboards and I find the windows > key prevalent enough to have it as my MODKEY.  I even have the menu key > wired to dmenu in xbindkeys for conveniance. > However I do have dmenu and a few othe

Re: [dev] dwm default bindings

2009-07-22 Thread stanio
* Donald Allen [2009-07-22 17:13]: > On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 10:42 AM, Julien Pecqueur > > Finally a dwm user should don't use suck - more application wich use the > > alt key ! ^^ > > You mean like Firefox? Thunderbird? Gnumeric? etc.? This would save a > lot of power, because the computer woul

Re: [dev] dwm default bindings

2009-07-22 Thread pancake
Donald Allen wrote: I think the default key bindings for dwm are a unfortunate in some cases. For example, alt-f, a natural choice for *f*loat mode, conflicts with pulling down the File menu in many applications from the keyboard. alt-T similarly conflicts with using the Tools menu in Firefox fro

Re: [dev] dwm default bindings

2009-07-22 Thread Scytrin dai Kinthra
I work on a wide variety of platforms and keyboards and I find the windows key prevalent enough to have it as my MODKEY. I even have the menu key wired to dmenu in xbindkeys for conveniance. However I do have dmenu and a few other commands I find indesposable setup to use Shift|Mod1 when I am on o

Re: [dev] dwm default bindings

2009-07-22 Thread Donald Allen
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 11:13 AM, Donald Allen wrote: > On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 10:42 AM, Julien Pecqueur > (JPEC) wrote: >> I think the ctrl+alt combinaison suck : you need two hands for killing a >> client... > > Not so, at least on my IBM keyboards and Thinkpad laptop keyboards. > Left pinky an

Re: [dev] dwm default bindings

2009-07-22 Thread Steven Blatchford
I also bind dwm keys and others to MOD4 and then use xmodmap to swap it with the Alt key. I rarely use the Alt key and find using the key on either side of the space bar easily accessible with my thumbs. -steve On 10:33 Wed 22 Jul, Niki Yoshiuchi wrote: >Personally I use the windows key as my mo

Re: [dev] dwm default bindings

2009-07-22 Thread Donald Allen
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 10:42 AM, Julien Pecqueur (JPEC) wrote: > I think the ctrl+alt combinaison suck : you need two hands for killing a > client... Not so, at least on my IBM keyboards and Thinkpad laptop keyboards. Left pinky and thumb on ctrl and alt, 2nd (pointer) finger on c. > Alt is bet

Re: [dev] dwm default bindings

2009-07-22 Thread Francois Gombault
More modifier keys = more finger torture, I would advise against doing this. -- F.

Re: [dev] dwm default bindings

2009-07-22 Thread Niki Yoshiuchi
Personally I use the windows key as my modifier, which I think makes the most sense. However there are keyboards out there that don't have a windows key so I don't know if it would be a good idea to use that as the default. On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 10:30 AM, Donald Allen wrote: > I think the defa

[dev] dwm default bindings

2009-07-22 Thread Donald Allen
I think the default key bindings for dwm are a unfortunate in some cases. For example, alt-f, a natural choice for *f*loat mode, conflicts with pulling down the File menu in many applications from the keyboard. alt-T similarly conflicts with using the Tools menu in Firefox from the keyboard. I rea