On Fri, 8 Jun 2012 09:23:16 -0500
Strake wrote:
> On 08/06/2012, Ethan Grammatikidis wrote:
> > On the linked page, Johan Petersson wrote:
> >
> >> It turns out, though, that system calls invoked via interrupts are
> >> remarkably slow on the more recent members of the x86 processor
> >> family.
On 08/06/2012, Ethan Grammatikidis wrote:
> On the linked page, Johan Petersson wrote:
>
>> It turns out, though, that system calls invoked via interrupts are
>> remarkably slow on the more recent members of the x86 processor
>> family. An int 0x80 system call can be as much as an order of
>> magn
On Tue, 5 Jun 2012 07:48:56 -0500
Strake wrote:
> The first is not a file, but rather code kept in the kernel and loaded
> in the memory space of every proc on the system.
>
> http://www.trilithium.com/johan/2005/08/linux-gate/
>
> Thus, it ought to not make grief, in this way at least.
> Clear
On 05/06/2012, Jens Staal wrote:
> Hi
>
> I was playing with packaging Christian's obase for Arch
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=56826
Thanks, never knew that before.
> and an easy-to-chroot package to complement it
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=59735
>
> The idea I ha
Hi
I was playing with packaging Christian's obase for Arch
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=56826
and an easy-to-chroot package to complement it
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=59735
The idea I had was that one could use this environment as a gradual
experimental environment t
