On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 10:14 AM, Donald Allen wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 10:08 AM, wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 02:44:42AM +0200, Aur?lien Aptel wrote:
>> > On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 10:12 PM, Donald Allen
>> wrote:
>> > > I'm an old-timer, very familiar with rcs and cvs and just a
On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 10:08 AM, wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 02:44:42AM +0200, Aur?lien Aptel wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 10:12 PM, Donald Allen
> wrote:
> > > I'm an old-timer, very familiar with rcs and cvs and just a bit
> > > with svn. No git, no hg.)
> > > /Don
> >
> > Read this
On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 02:44:42AM +0200, Aur?lien Aptel wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 10:12 PM, Donald Allen wrote:
> > I'm an old-timer, very familiar with rcs and cvs and just a bit
> > with svn. No git, no hg.)
> > /Don
>
> Read this really nice tutorial : http://hginit.com
so I think, his
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 10:12 PM, Donald Allen wrote:
> I'm an old-timer, very familiar with rcs and cvs and just a bit
> with svn. No git, no hg.)
> /Don
Read this really nice tutorial : http://hginit.com
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 4:12 PM, Donald Allen wrote:
> I checked out the whole wiki using
> hg clone http://hg.suckless.org/sites
> just like it says. I've made my modifications in
> sites/dwm.suckless.org/patches -- generated an alternative patch file for
> the bstack patch and modified the descr
Hello. I've been a long time reader but never posted here before.
This might be of some interest. I've tackled this issue before with my own
version of the pertag patch that dynamically allocates memory. This patch
also adds per tag defaults. Any comments and criticisms appreciated.
--- a/config.d
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 1:20 PM, Andrew Antle wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 12:55 PM, Donald Allen
> wrote:
> > I actually offered to do this in a private message to Anselm last
> December.
> > He didn't respond. He's always been very good about responding to my
> emails
> > (and in a very gent
On 7 July 2010 16:08, Donald Allen wrote:
> dwm-5.8.2: if you attempt to apply both the pertag and bstack patches to
> dwm, the resulting code will not compile.
...
> /Don
Ah, I think the 5.8.2 patch not being checked was my fault, I just
took it from Julien's e-mail to this list and added to the
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 1:29 PM, Donald Allen wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 1:20 PM, Andrew Antle wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 12:55 PM, Donald Allen
>> wrote:
>> > I actually offered to do this in a private message to Anselm last
>> December.
>> > He didn't respond. He's always been
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 1:20 PM, Andrew Antle wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 12:55 PM, Donald Allen
> wrote:
> > I actually offered to do this in a private message to Anselm last
> December.
> > He didn't respond. He's always been very good about responding to my
> emails
> > (and in a very gent
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 12:55 PM, Donald Allen wrote:
> I actually offered to do this in a private message to Anselm last December.
> He didn't respond. He's always been very good about responding to my emails
> (and in a very gentlemanly way, I might add), so I think this one just fell
> through a
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 12:53 PM, v4hn wrote:
> good morning!
>
> http://lists.suckless.org/dev/1006/4795.html
>
> reading mails isn't to hard, is it?
>
Not if you get them.
>
> Well, probably you subscribed a couple of days later...
> But don't blame me for not getting answers.
>
I just subscr
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 11:56 AM, Andrew Antle wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 11:08 AM, Donald Allen
> wrote:
> > dwm-5.8.2: if you attempt to apply both the pertag and bstack patches to
> > dwm, the resulting code will not compile. The reason is that the
> definition
> > of the monitor struct is
good morning!
http://lists.suckless.org/dev/1006/4795.html
reading mails isn't to hard, is it?
Well, probably you subscribed a couple of days later...
But don't blame me for not getting answers.
On Wed, Jul 07, 2010 at 11:08:13AM -0400, Donald Allen wrote:
> It appears that whoever updated this
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 11:08 AM, Donald Allen wrote:
> dwm-5.8.2: if you attempt to apply both the pertag and bstack patches to
> dwm, the resulting code will not compile. The reason is that the definition
> of the monitor struct is moved after the include of config.h in dwm.c by
> the pertag patc
dwm-5.8.2: if you attempt to apply both the pertag and bstack patches to
dwm, the resulting code will not compile. The reason is that the definition
of the monitor struct is moved after the include of config.h in dwm.c by
the pertag patch. The bstack patch includes the bstack and bstackhoriz
functi
16 matches
Mail list logo
