On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 04:33:20PM +0100, Troels Henriksen wrote:
> Kurt H Maier writes:
>
> > On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 03:30:38PM +, Nick wrote:
> >>
> >> The way I do it with a local proxy means that said requests are
> >> stripped out of the HTML before reaching the browser. DNS based
> >>
Kurt H Maier writes:
> On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 03:30:38PM +, Nick wrote:
>>
>> The way I do it with a local proxy means that said requests are
>> stripped out of the HTML before reaching the browser. DNS based
>> things will presumably fail immediately with /etc/hosts, rather
>> than time ou
What about something like pixelserv (written in perl[1] or C[2]) with
something like hostsblock[3]?
It's a DNS solution, but the timeouts aren't a problem
1: http://proxytunnel.sourceforge.net/pixelserv.php
2:
http://www.linksysinfo.org/index.php?threads/pixelserv-compiled-to-run-on-router-wrt54
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 03:30:38PM +, Nick wrote:
>
> The way I do it with a local proxy means that said requests are
> stripped out of the HTML before reaching the browser. DNS based
> things will presumably fail immediately with /etc/hosts, rather
> than time out.
>
But you're still wastin
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 10:14:15AM -0500, Kurt H Maier wrote:
> wtf? the ads are DISPLAYED in the browser. it's stupid to blackhole
> dns and let requests time out rather than just not making the request in
> the first place.
The way I do it with a local proxy means that said requests are
stri
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 02:08:01PM +, Nick wrote:
> Yeah, I agree with the general feeling that adblocking shouldn't be
> done in the browser.
wtf? the ads are DISPLAYED in the browser. it's stupid to blackhole
dns and let requests time out rather than just not making the request in
the firs
Yeah, I agree with the general feeling that adblocking shouldn't be
done in the browser. I prefer privoxy, though it's rather complex.
adsuck is another thing that probably does the job well. /etc/hosts
can do a reasonable job too, as others have mentioned.
Also, there is the fact that adblocking
I want web pages and pdfs to be rendered in the cloud, because my fan
is running hot.
also never forget:
if most web sites suck, use less web sites.
sorry if you consider this off-topic.
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 7:27 AM, Christoph Lohmann <2...@r-36.net> wrote:
> Hosts filtering re‐
> quires some callback to filter on a specific hosts file with >15k
> lines on every request.
Would it be possible to disable requests made by the page to any
address outside the page's domai
I block only in my DNS. I think it's the most important feature of my
home network. Not only because it blocks ads, but also because it
block fads.
On 11/20/12, Christoph Lohmann <2...@r-36.net> wrote:
> Greetings comrades,
>
> I have been thinking of adding some easy way of adblocking to surf.
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 01:27:39PM +0100, Christoph Lohmann wrote:
> I have been thinking of adding some easy way of adblocking to surf. My
> conclusion is, that it is not needed.
> [...]
> What are you comrades thinking of this?
I don't need adblocking inside the browser. I'm using a hosts
file
Greetings comrades,
I have been thinking of adding some easy way of adblocking to surf. My
conclusion is, that it is not needed.
By changing the default parameters of surf to »‐ips«, which will disable
all the scripts, the images and plugins by default, nothing wrong is
loaded when some UR
Greetings.
On Tue, 20 Nov 2012 11:54:01 +0100 Hiltjo Posthuma
wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 6:50 PM, Christoph Lohmann <2...@r-36.net> wrote:
> >
> > Anyone has done the wget/curl scripts together to handle referer, cook‐
> > ies and whatever else is needed to fool websites, so it could be u
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 6:50 PM, Christoph Lohmann <2...@r-36.net> wrote:
>
> Anyone has done the wget/curl scripts together to handle referer, cook‐
> ies and whatever else is needed to fool websites, so it could be used in
> surf?
>
> Such a script would be useful for other not‐surf‐related down
Dear God, amen
On Nov 16, 2012 4:38 PM, "Christoph Lohmann" <2...@r-36.net> wrote:
> Greetings comrades.
>
> If you are using surf, be noticed that you should change your useragent
> value in your config.h. The default is now changed to something that
> will work with the mediocre technolo
Greetings comrades.
If you are using surf, be noticed that you should change your useragent
value in your config.h. The default is now changed to something that
will work with the mediocre technology at Google, which needs correct
useragent strings to work with their bloated javascript cra
it should be enough to always send the site's base url as referrer.
Greetings.
On Fri, 16 Nov 2012 18:50:02 +0100 Hiltjo Posthuma
wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 5:41 PM, Nick wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 05:22:01PM +0100, Hiltjo Posthuma wrote:
> >
> >> For privacy reasons it's probably best to only pass the referrer
> >> if the target download uri is f
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 5:41 PM, Nick wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 05:22:01PM +0100, Hiltjo Posthuma wrote:
>
>> For privacy reasons it's probably best to only pass the referrer
>> if the target download uri is from the same site.
>
> Not sure about this. We happily pass the referrer around ev
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 05:22:01PM +0100, Hiltjo Posthuma wrote:
> Some sites check the HTTP referrer
Ah, good point, I'd forgotten about that. Such sites seem to be
reasonably rare, but worth supporting.
> For privacy reasons it's probably best to only pass the referrer
> if the target download
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 4:43 PM, Nick wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 04:29:25PM +0100, Christoph Lohmann wrote:
>> On my TODO list for surf is to get the downloading right
>
> What are your plans for this? There's a patch on the wiki using
> webkit's built-in download support, but it was decided
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 04:29:25PM +0100, Christoph Lohmann wrote:
> On my TODO list for surf is to get the downloading right
What are your plans for this? There's a patch on the wiki using
webkit's built-in download support, but it was decided that wget
actually tended to work fine. Are there any
Greetings comrades,
surf now has a nice surf‐open.sh script in its tip, which will add some
more convenience for daily usage of surf as a replacement for other
browsers. With the toggle patches to disable scripting and other re‐
source‐hungry crap noone really needs but marketing peop
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 10:13:56AM +0100, Christoph Lohmann wrote:
> Who will send the patch to replace Webkit with something sane?
>
> Sincerely,
> Christoph Lohmann
Well there is no sane thing for web, and I think trying to make one would drive
the creator insane. I think the closest thing to s
Greetings.
On Fri, 16 Nov 2012 10:13:56 +0100 sta...@cs.tu-berlin.de wrote:
> * Nick [2012-11-15 15:47]:
> > Insert mode? Since when did surf become modal? Why is this needed
> > (except for people who like to pretend they're using vim)?
>
> I agree, insert mode is quite special and maybe is wor
* Nick [2012-11-15 15:47]:
> Insert mode? Since when did surf become modal? Why is this needed
> (except for people who like to pretend they're using vim)?
I agree, insert mode is quite special and maybe is worth having it as a
patch rather than in mainline surf. It makes character handling less
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 03:29:45PM +0100, Christoph Lohmann wrote:
> Thanks for the patches. Toggle, insert and the status area patch are now
> in surf tip. And they are documented in the manpage too.
Insert mode? Since when did surf become modal? Why is this needed
(except for people who like to
Greetings.
On Thu, 15 Nov 2012 15:29:45 +0100 sta...@cs.tu-berlin.de wrote:
> * sta...@cs.tu-berlin.de [2012-11-15 14:34]:
> > * s...@alternametz.org [2012-11-15 12:56]:
> > > As a side note, I wonder how difficult would it be to create
> > > a generic toggle function for surf which could be calle
No problem. The method is based on a piece of code found on uzbl wiki.
Just paste this in ~/.surf/script.js (see attachement).
The first part of the code is just simple rules towhitelist some
domains. (see examples)
Have a nice day everyone!
Le 10:38:28 le 15 nov. 2012 , Nick a écrit :
> Quo
* sta...@cs.tu-berlin.de [2012-11-15 14:34]:
> * s...@alternametz.org [2012-11-15 12:56]:
> > As a side note, I wonder how difficult would it be to create
> > a generic toggle function for surf which could be called with
>
> look for 20120602113939.GA26438 in your mailbox or
> http://permalink.gm
* s...@alternametz.org [2012-11-15 12:56]:
> As a side note, I wonder how difficult would it be to create
> a generic toggle function for surf which could be called with
> any WebKitWebSettings boolean parameter in config.h such as
> "auto-load-images", "enable-scripts" and so on ...
look for 201
Greetings.
On Thu, 15 Nov 2012 14:11:09 +0100 Raphael Proust wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 9:40 AM, Julian Dammann
> wrote:
> >> I read them, but I suppose I don't remember them...
> >
> > No.
> > Not to sound too rude, but this is not the problem here...
>
> The problem is surf has no GUI
Nick wrote:
> (...) I'd like to be able to disable javascript
> on a per site basis, but have never got around to doing that.
> (...)
Hello,
Sorry, not related to the per site basis :
The handiest way to deal with javascript on surf at the moment
is IMO the toggle patch you put on the wiki,
On 2012/11/15 - 09:49:04 +, Raphael Proust wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 9:40 AM, Julian Dammann
> wrote:
> >> I read them, but I suppose I don't remember them...
> >
> > No.
> > Not to sound too rude, but this is not the problem here...
>
> The problem is surf has no GUI with drop-down m
> Well, you don't know what I did, so don't judge too fast.
I'm stating facts, take away any judgement you feel entitled to.
Fact is: your question was trivial; the answer to your question *was* one "man
surf" or web search away.
> I did read the manual, a long time ago, bit I did. And I'm sure
Quoth Thuban:
> I alsa used for a while a kind of "noscript" in .surf/script.js.
Care to share the details? I'd like to be able to disable javascript
on a per site basis, but have never got around to doing that. Adding
proper support in surf rather than just script.js would probably be
better,
Well, you don't know what I did, so don't judge too fast.
I alsa used for a while a kind of "noscript" in .surf/script.js.
I did read the manual, a long time ago, bit I did. And I'm sure such
mistakes can happen to anyone.
Le 10:40:08 le 15 nov. 2012 , Julian Dammann a écrit :
> > I read them, bu
On 11/15/2012 10:40 AM, Julian Dammann wrote:
I read them, but I suppose I don't remember them...
No.
Not to sound too rude, but this is not the problem here...
Welcome to "How to answer almost all your questions about any software without
wasting other people's time":
1. Is there a manual?
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 9:40 AM, Julian Dammann wrote:
>> I read them, but I suppose I don't remember them...
>
> No.
> Not to sound too rude, but this is not the problem here...
The problem is surf has no GUI with drop-down menus and stuff… If it
had, then everyone would refer to http://xkcd.com
> I read them, but I suppose I don't remember them...
No.
Not to sound too rude, but this is not the problem here...
Welcome to "How to answer almost all your questions about any software without
wasting other people's time":
1. Is there a manual? If no goto 2 else 1a
1a. Have you read it? If
I read them, but I suppose I don't remember them...
Le 20:59:12 le 14 nov. 2012 , Christoph Lohmann a écrit :
> Greetings.
>
> On Wed, 14 Nov 2012 20:59:12 +0100 Thuban wrote:
> > How could I have missed this?
>
> Because you never read manpages.
>
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Christoph Lohmann
>
>
Greetings.
On Wed, 14 Nov 2012 20:59:12 +0100 Thuban wrote:
> How could I have missed this?
Because you never read manpages.
Sincerely,
Christoph Lohmann
How could I have missed this?
Thank you
Le 09:56:34 le 12 nov. 2012 , Nick a écrit :
> > Do you have any method to disable completely javascript in surf (I mean
> > always, not by a per-site rule)?
>
> surf -s
>
--
,--. Xavier Cartron , /(
: /` ) M2 MEFPC
> Do you have any method to disable completely javascript in surf (I mean
> always, not by a per-site rule)?
surf -s
Hello,
Do you have any method to disable completely javascript in surf (I mean
always, not by a per-site rule)?
Thanks
--
,--. Xavier Cartron , /(
: /` ) M2 MEFPCo **}=\\,\(,,
| `-' Debian user<0--(___(_\
I'm not enough "C-self confident" to do this yet. But if anyone is able
to, I would be more than interested too.
If there is no problem, I'll put it on the wiki if no one is against.
Cheers,
Xavier
Le 14:24:21 le 07 nov. 2012 , Christoph Lohmann a écrit :
> Hello.
>
> On Wed, 07 Nov 2012 14:24
Hello.
On Wed, 07 Nov 2012 14:24:21 +0100 Thuban wrote:
> hi all,
> Instead of always using Ctrl + any other key to navigate with surf, here
> is a simple replacement using vim usual shortcuts.
> It is javascript, and simply typing h/j/k/l to move around is enough.
> Pressing g or G bring you to
hi all,
Instead of always using Ctrl + any other key to navigate with surf, here
is a simple replacement using vim usual shortcuts.
It is javascript, and simply typing h/j/k/l to move around is enough.
Pressing g or G bring you to the top or the bottom of the page.
Just add this code in ~/.surf.sc
Greetings comrades.
There are some changes for surf in the repository now:
* The loading indicator will only appear on loading.
* If using a proxy then the colors of the indicator are different.
* Mod + / is now search.
* There are now commandline options to specify
Hello.
On Sat, 27 Oct 2012 18:03:32 +0200 "Eric R. J. Edwards"
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I recently found that the most recently available search engine patch
> fails on surf 0.5. A tiny change fixes that, and I've attached the
> resultant diff file.
Please send patches for the wiki using the wik
Hi all,
I recently found that the most recently available search engine patch
fails on surf 0.5. A tiny change fixes that, and I've attached the
resultant diff file.
Best,
Eric
--- surf.c 2012-10-26 17:58:18.912014914 +0200
+++ surf.c 2012-10-27 15:54:06.332317229 +0200
@@ -68,6 +68,11 @@
On 19 October 2012 21:13, Strake wrote:
> On 19/10/2012, Calvin Morrison wrote:
>> I think the largest benefit is the cache. Loading up many
>> http://google.com's would mean you'd have to reload all of the images
>> and such, whereas with one process, you wouldn't have an opportunity
>> of overl
Quoth Christoph Lohmann:
> Thanks for the fast response. The patch is now applied. Please all test
> it out. Webkit is such a huge beast that standard inefficient beta test‐
> ing has to be applied to find corner cases.
I've been using it since you pushed it out, and so far have seen no
problems
On 19/10/2012, Calvin Morrison wrote:
> I think the largest benefit is the cache. Loading up many
> http://google.com's would mean you'd have to reload all of the images
> and such, whereas with one process, you wouldn't have an opportunity
> of overlap cache.
So make a local HTTP caching proxy.
On 19 October 2012 13:16, Carlos Pita wrote:
>> I have mixed feelings about this idea.
>>
>> On the one hand, I like that new windows are new processes. It makes
>> sense, and ensures that unix tools like kill, and I imagine workload
>> schedulers, work as expected.
>
> I know. I just think that t
> I have mixed feelings about this idea.
>
> On the one hand, I like that new windows are new processes. It makes
> sense, and ensures that unix tools like kill, and I imagine workload
> schedulers, work as expected.
I know. I just think that the memory tradeoff is significant enough to
pay this c
Quoth Carlos Pita:
> I've coded this patch that considerably reduces surf memory usage
> (and some LOCs) by avoiding the creation of a new process each
> time a new webview is created.
I have mixed feelings about this idea.
On the one hand, I like that new windows are new processes. It makes
s
Hi all,
I've coded this patch that considerably reduces surf memory usage (and
some LOCs) by avoiding the creation of a new process each time a new
webview is created. The patch is very simple, it just replaces calls
to newwindow with calls to a slightly modified newclient. This only
applies to "i
Greetings.
On Thu, 18 Oct 2012 20:14:37 +0200 Carlos Torres wrote:
> Does anyone else find that scrolling with the keyboad shortcuts doesn't
> work on a page with frames?
You are scrolling in the frames, due to focus changes. The same happens
in big divs with images.
The only solution seems
Happens to me, too. I've found that this happens on a bunch of other webkit
browsers: luakit, vimprobable, uzbl, etc.
Vimium, an add-on that gives chromium vim-like keybindings, solves this by
making "gf" switch between frames. Maybe surf can do something like that?
-Nimi
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at
Does anyone else find that scrolling with the keyboad shortcuts doesn't
work on a page with frames?
--Carlos
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 1:11 AM, Christoph Lohmann <2...@r-36.net> wrote:
> Greetings.
>
> On Sun, 14 Oct 2012 07:11:49 +0200 Thomas Dean <78...@web.de> wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at
Hello.
On Tue, 16 Oct 2012 21:57:26 +0200 Carlos Pita wrote:
> Sure Christoph, in fact I put all this in a separate file because it
> didn't play well with surf style, but there was a reason for that and
> it was that I needed to follow some gtk or webkit conventions just
> because of the macros
Sure Christoph, in fact I put all this in a separate file because it
didn't play well with surf style, but there was a reason for that and
it was that I needed to follow some gtk or webkit conventions just
because of the macros you dislike. I have forgotten the details but
give me a little time and
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 09:03:44AM -0300, Carlos Pita wrote:
> Maybe you will find this patch to enable webkit cookie support (the
> cookie jar) useful.
Thanks for that Carlos. I had been vaguely wanting somebody to do
this for ages! Now reformat it as Christoph desires, so we can all
delight in i
Hello.
On Tue, 16 Oct 2012 16:21:47 +0200 Carlos Pita wrote:
> Maybe you will find this patch to enable webkit cookie support (the
> cookie jar) useful.
I tried really hard to integrate this patch into surf, but I always had
to scream in insanity because of this pita to have to define hidden de
On 16 October 2012 15:03, Carlos Pita wrote:
> Maybe you will find this patch to enable webkit cookie support (the
> cookie jar) useful.
>
> Regards
> --
> Carlos
>
> On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 5:37 AM, Daniel Bainton wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I bumped into a bug in surf.
>>
>> I try to use Googles multip
Maybe you will find this patch to enable webkit cookie support (the
cookie jar) useful.
Regards
--
Carlos
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 5:37 AM, Daniel Bainton wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I bumped into a bug in surf.
>
> I try to use Googles multiple sign-in so I can view my work and my
> personal mail in the sa
Hi,
I bumped into a bug in surf.
I try to use Googles multiple sign-in so I can view my work and my
personal mail in the same browser, but somehow the cookies start
fighting and all sorts of buggy behaviour shows in Google Mail.
1. Most of the time I can only open one of the inboxes at a time, t
Greetings.
On Sun, 14 Oct 2012 07:11:49 +0200 Thomas Dean <78...@web.de> wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 13:56:48 +0200, Thuban wrote:
> > I was just meaning the shortcus defined in config.h, nothing else.
> >
> > I just tried your changes, but I still can't, as example, scroll with
> > control-
On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 13:56:48 +0200, Thuban wrote:
> I was just meaning the shortcus defined in config.h, nothing else.
>
> I just tried your changes, but I still can't, as example, scroll with
> control-j.
>
> Am I the only one with this issue?
I have the same problem since changeset 246. No
I was just meaning the shortcus defined in config.h, nothing else.
I just tried your changes, but I still can't, as example, scroll with
control-j.
Am I the only one with this issue?
Le 12:06:02 le 13 oct. 2012 , Christoph Lohmann a écrit :
> Greetings.
>
> On Sat, 13 Oct 2012 12:06:02 +0200
Greetings.
On Sat, 13 Oct 2012 12:06:02 +0200 Thuban wrote:
> Hi,
> Have you noticed that in last hg tip of surf, it is impossible to
> navigate using keyboard. It seems GDK_CONTROL_MASK is not recognised
> anymore.
What extra navigation but the default config.h do you mean?
I pushed a change t
Hi,
Have you noticed that in last hg tip of surf, it is impossible to
navigate using keyboard. It seems GDK_CONTROL_MASK is not recognised
anymore.
--
,--. Xavier Cartron , /(
: /` ) M2 MEFPCo **}=\\,\(,,
| `-' Debian user
Greetings.
On Sat, 13 Oct 2012 07:18:23 +0200 Alexander Sedov
wrote:
> 2012/10/12 Christoph Lohmann <2...@r-36.net>:
> > Greetings.
> >
> > On Fri, 12 Oct 2012 19:42:11 +0200 Carlos Pita
> > wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I found this patch for the bug but I don't think it's right to just
> >> hide
Greetings.
On Sat, 13 Oct 2012 07:17:05 +0200 Carlos Pita wrote:
> Hi,
>
> experiencing problems in some pages with the "middle click links" js
> script I wrote this patch to achieve the same goal. Middle button
> click opens a new tab while inside tabbed and a new window in case
> surf is not e
>>> c->progress = 100; // <--- previously = 0
>>
>> Could you please send patches instead of complex inline gibberish?
Sorry, it was just 1 LOC and I wasn't even sure that the fix was the
right one. Here is the patch.
Regards
--
Carlos
surf-r246-0progress.diff
Description: B
Makes "copy link location" item in context menu to feed the primary
selection so then you can just middle-click to paste as usual.
Regards
--
Carlos
surf-r246-primsel.diff
Description: Binary data
Hi,
experiencing problems in some pages with the "middle click links" js
script I wrote this patch to achieve the same goal. Middle button
click opens a new tab while inside tabbed and a new window in case
surf is not embedded. Also, ctrl-middle-click forces new window.
Regards
--
Carlos
surf-r
2012/10/12 Christoph Lohmann <2...@r-36.net>:
> Greetings.
>
> On Fri, 12 Oct 2012 19:42:11 +0200 Carlos Pita
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I found this patch for the bug but I don't think it's right to just
>> hide the [0%] because there is the legitimate case when the page
>> hasn't started to load yet
Greetings.
On Fri, 12 Oct 2012 19:42:11 +0200 Carlos Pita wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I found this patch for the bug but I don't think it's right to just
> hide the [0%] because there is the legitimate case when the page
> hasn't started to load yet.
>
> http://www.digipedia.pl/usenet/thread/15253/9123/
>
Hi,
I found this patch for the bug but I don't think it's right to just
hide the [0%] because there is the legitimate case when the page
hasn't started to load yet.
http://www.digipedia.pl/usenet/thread/15253/9123/
So I did this instead:
case WEBKIT_LOAD_FINISHED:
c->progress = 100;
Greetings.
On Fri, 12 Oct 2012 12:31:17 +0200 Carlos Pita wrote:
> Sorry Christoph, I've cloned the tip but the last changeset I'm able to see
> is:
Yes, I forgot to push the commit. It is now on the repository.
Sincerely,
Christoph Lohmann
Sorry Christoph, I've cloned the tip but the last changeset I'm able to see is:
changeset: 245:7fe5e1810a81
tag: tip
user:Christoph Lohmann <2...@r-36.net>
date:Mon Jul 16 16:35:47 2012 +0200
summary: Surf now parses hex window ids properly from tabbed.
have you push
Greetings.
On Fri, 12 Oct 2012 11:45:04 +0200 Carlos Pita wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this seems like a bug in surf 0.5 to me. When defining a couple of key
> bindings for the same key, one with a shift mask and the other without
> the mask, the commands for both bindings are executed in sequence when
> I
Hi,
this seems like a bug in surf 0.5 to me. When defining a couple of key
bindings for the same key, one with a shift mask and the other without
the mask, the commands for both bindings are executed in sequence when
I press the shift-masked key once.
For example:
My keys[]
{ MODKEY,
Hello,
I believe loaduri does not free all strings in all situations.
A patch attached.
Jakub Daniel
surf-0.5-loaduri-gfree-memleak.patch
Description: Binary data
Hi,
I'm trying to use this tips : http://surf.suckless.org/files/hide_applets
but it seems that the script is not executed.
Is there any method to have surf more verbose? I would like to
understand what's happening.
Regards,
Xavier
Problem solved now with last changes. Thanks!
Le 16:36:53 le 16 juil. 2012 , Christoph Lohmann a écrit :
> Greetings.
>
> On Mon, 16 Jul 2012 16:36:53 +0200 Thuban wrote:
> > Of course, I should give more explanations. Sorry
> > I launch tabbed to get it's id :
> > tabbed -d > /tmp/tabbedid
> >
Greetings.
On Mon, 16 Jul 2012 16:36:53 +0200 Thuban wrote:
> Of course, I should give more explanations. Sorry
> I launch tabbed to get it's id :
> tabbed -d > /tmp/tabbedid
>
> Then, when I want to launch surf inside this way :
> surf -e $(cat /tmp/tabbedid)
>
> it's just not working, I hav
Nick wrote:
> The SSL something is changeset 227,
The incrementing changeset numbers are local only. If you want to
reference a changeset for another, use the hash.
--
Josh Rickmar
http://jrick.devio.us/
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
Of course, I should give more explanations. Sorry
I launch tabbed to get it's id :
tabbed -d > /tmp/tabbedid
Then, when I want to launch surf inside this way :
surf -e $(cat /tmp/tabbedid)
it's just not working, I have surf and tabbed separated. What I want is
to be able to open a new surf in t
Greetings.
On Mon, 16 Jul 2012 14:44:05 +0200 Thuban wrote:
> Since tabbed 0.4, it is impossible to embed surf. However, it still
> works with urxvt.
>
> Did syntax have changed or is it a bug?
That bug report is invalid.
How are you invoking both? What happens? What doesn't happen what
you ex
actually it quits after xinit (dunno why I wrote 'before run label' XD)
Messaggio originale
Da: peterjohnhart...@gmail.com
Data: 16-lug-2012 13.47
A: "dev mail list"
Ogg: Re: R: Re: [dev] Surf 0.5 released
I use surf & st just fine. st -e has worked for about
it quits before even going to the 'run' label.
on a side note is it plain impossible to call wget from surf without using a
terminal?
Messaggio originale
Da: peterjohnhart...@gmail.com
Data: 16-lug-2012 13.47
A: "dev mail list"
Ogg: Re: R: Re: [dev] Surf 0.5 released
I use surf & st just fine. st -e has worked for about a year. here's
a quick fix:
sed 's/xterm/st/' config.def.h
Peter
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 7:03 AM, Nick wrote:
> Quoth anonimopococin...@alice.it:
>> surf still relies on xterm for the downloads, why can't we use st?
>> (I mean I did a few
Since tabbed 0.4, it is impossible to embed surf. However, it still
works with urxvt.
Did syntax have changed or is it a bug?
--
,--. Xavier Cartron , /(
: /` ) M1 MEFPCo **}=\\,\(,,
| `-' Debian user<0-- (
Quoth anonimopococin...@alice.it:
> surf still relies on xterm for the downloads, why can't we use st?
> (I mean I did a few -superficial- attempts at using st instead of
> xterm, but it does not work, probably st's fault, do you know
> where the problem is?)
Something to do with quoting and -
: suckless-...@njw.me.uk
Data: 16-lug-2012 12.12
A: "dev mail list"
Ogg: Re: [dev] Surf 0.5 released
Quoth Troels Henriksen:
> For the next release, the surf hackers will work dilligently on
> supporting emerging web technologies such as cookies and file downloads.
To ensure that I'm c
Add the horizontal scrolling keybinds to the manpage.
diff -r 5596ef69d425 surf.1
--- a/surf.1 Thu Jul 12 12:41:56 2012 +0200
+++ b/surf.1 Mon Jul 16 11:21:24 2012 +0100
@@ -51,6 +51,12 @@
.B Ctrl\-j
Scrolls page downwards.
.TP
+.B Ctrl\-u
+Scrolls page left.
+.TP
+.B Ctrl\-i
+Scrolls page right
Quoth Troels Henriksen:
> For the next release, the surf hackers will work dilligently on
> supporting emerging web technologies such as cookies and file downloads.
To ensure that I'm considered humourless, I have to point out that
file downloads are working fine now. Even downloads which require
901 - 1000 of 1998 matches
Mail list logo
