Re: [dev] surf ssl handshake

2010-10-05 Thread Uriel
Slightly offtopic, but just occurred to me that "the SSL handshake" should be renamed "the SSL middle finger", specially in consideration of the scam that are CAs. uriel On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 9:15 PM, Martin Kopta wrote: > I use surf and about a week ago it begun to refuse to load https pages

Re: [dev] surf ssl handshake

2010-10-04 Thread Nick
Quoth Jacob Todd: > I thought surf didn't have finished ssl support, and that pages weren't > actually secure when visiting with https (https://grc.com won't load in > surf). I could be wrong though. https://grc.com returns 301 moved permenantly to http://grc.com/intro.htm So it looks like a bad

Re: [dev] surf ssl handshake

2010-10-03 Thread Jacob Todd
I thought surf didn't have finished ssl support, and that pages weren't actually secure when visiting with https (https://grc.com won't load in surf). I could be wrong though.

Re: [dev] surf ssl handshake

2010-10-03 Thread Nick
Quoth Martin Kopta: > SSL handshake failed: A record packet with illegal version was received. > > I guess it is not surfs fault but before I dig deeper, I would like to > know if somebody doesn't have the same problem. I saw this a month or so ago with Gentoo. libsoup+gnutls was the problem; se

[dev] surf ssl handshake

2010-10-03 Thread Martin Kopta
I use surf and about a week ago it begun to refuse to load https pages with message SSL handshake failed: A record packet with illegal version was received. I guess it is not surfs fault but before I dig deeper, I would like to know if somebody doesn't have the same problem. I recompiled openssl