> Remark: st -o .../bla.st is not explicitely what I'm after. I only
> want the output and I don't want to specify a file name each time I
> run it. I guess I will hack st to log to /var/log or something similar
> for this task.
I have some patches in my repository about this point. There are some
On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 11:58:36AM +, Raphaël Proust wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 11:45 AM, Marc André Tanner
> wrote:
> > http://repo.or.cz/w/abduco.git
>
> Can you explain why you coded it? What in dtach(1) didn't you like?
To be honest it started out a year ago when I had to do some
On 2014-02-23, at 13:13, Raphaël Proust wrote:
> This is very interesting. The main complaint I have towards dtach(1)
> (I have the same complaint about screen(1) and tmux(1), but for those
> it's not the *main* complaint) is the need to first ssh into an
> interactive session. I'd like to do `dta
On Sunday, February 23, 2014 11:58:36 AM Raphaël Proust wrote:
> Comment:
> The manpage states
>
> > if a given session name starts either with a dot or a forward slash
> > it is interpreted as a path name and used unmodified i.e. relatively to
> > the
> > current working directory.
>
> That seem
On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 1:49 PM, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
> On 22 February 2014 14:42, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
>> On 22 February 2014 14:37, Markus Teich wrote:
>>> Anselm R Garbe wrote:
All I want is to have full logging of all output when building various
stuff,
now stali related st
On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 11:45 AM, Marc André Tanner wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 02:17:54PM +0100, Christoph Lohmann wrote:
>> On Sat, 22 Feb 2014 14:17:54 +0100 Anselm R Garbe wrote:
>> > Hi there,
>> >
>> > is there any less sucking screen/tmux replacement these days?
>> >
>> > I just tried
On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 02:17:54PM +0100, Christoph Lohmann wrote:
> Greetings.
>
> On Sat, 22 Feb 2014 14:17:54 +0100 Anselm R Garbe wrote:
> > Hi there,
> >
> > is there any less sucking screen/tmux replacement these days?
> >
> > I just tried to find one, but no luck...
>
> Dtach and dvtm
On 02/22/2014 08:44 AM, Christoph Lohmann wrote:
> Greetings.
>
> On Sat, 22 Feb 2014 14:44:10 +0100 Anselm R Garbe wrote:
>> On 22 February 2014 14:37, Markus Teich wrote:
>>> Anselm R Garbe wrote:
All I want is to have full logging of all output when building various
stuff,
now
On 22 February 2014 14:51, Christoph Lohmann <2...@r-36.net> wrote:
> On Sat, 22 Feb 2014 14:51:16 +0100 Anselm R Garbe wrote:
>> On 22 February 2014 14:42, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
>>
>> Perhaps this will be achieved in the future. The st formatting was
>> also thought to provide a "text mode" like
Greetings.
On Sat, 22 Feb 2014 14:51:16 +0100 Anselm R Garbe wrote:
> On 22 February 2014 14:42, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
>
> Perhaps this will be achieved in the future. The st formatting was
> also thought to provide a "text mode" like interface, but a
> *graphical* one. As most people do use gra
On Sat, 22 Feb 2014 14:33:20 +0100
Anselm R Garbe wrote:
> For terminal detach/attach I could use dtach. I'm only after a
> solution for scrollback buffer. Probably this should become a separate
> tool.
>
> If you don't use screen/tmux with st, what other tool comes to mind
> for a scrollback bu
On 2014-02-22 14:33:20 +0100, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
> For terminal detach/attach I could use dtach. I'm only after a
> solution for scrollback buffer. Probably this should become a separate
> tool.
It is still my opinion that the scrollback buffer should be the job of
the terminal emulator, but I
On 22 February 2014 14:42, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
> On 22 February 2014 14:37, Markus Teich wrote:
>> Anselm R Garbe wrote:
>>> All I want is to have full logging of all output when building various
>>> stuff,
>>> now stali related stuff.
>>
>> I would just pipe it to less.
>
> I rather want pers
Greetings.
On Sat, 22 Feb 2014 14:44:10 +0100 Anselm R Garbe wrote:
> On 22 February 2014 14:37, Markus Teich wrote:
> > Anselm R Garbe wrote:
> >> All I want is to have full logging of all output when building various
> >> stuff,
> >> now stali related stuff.
> >
> > I would just pipe it to le
Hi,
On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 02:33:20PM +0100, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
> If you don't use screen/tmux with st, what other tool comes to mind
> for a scrollback buffer?
Well, there is [1]…
Kind regards,
-Alex
[1] http://lists.suckless.org/dev/1310/17807.html
On 22 February 2014 14:37, Markus Teich wrote:
> Anselm R Garbe wrote:
>> All I want is to have full logging of all output when building various stuff,
>> now stali related stuff.
>
> I would just pipe it to less.
I rather want persistent logs. And I want it implicit. Sometimes I
realize, oh dang
Anselm R Garbe wrote:
> All I want is to have full logging of all output when building various stuff,
> now stali related stuff.
I would just pipe it to less.
--Markus
On 22 February 2014 14:33, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
> On 22 February 2014 14:29, Chris Down wrote:
>> On 2014-02-22 14:19:12 +0100, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
>>> is there any less sucking screen/tmux replacement these days?
>
>> For which part? Terminal multiplexing, or terminal attach/detach?
>
> For t
On 22 February 2014 14:29, Chris Down wrote:
> On 2014-02-22 14:19:12 +0100, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
>> is there any less sucking screen/tmux replacement these days?
> For which part? Terminal multiplexing, or terminal attach/detach?
For terminal detach/attach I could use dtach. I'm only after a
s
On 2014-02-22 14:19:12 +0100, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
> is there any less sucking screen/tmux replacement these days?
For which part? Terminal multiplexing, or terminal attach/detach?
pgpVAgc4zqniH.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Greetings.
On Sat, 22 Feb 2014 14:17:54 +0100 Anselm R Garbe wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> is there any less sucking screen/tmux replacement these days?
>
> I just tried to find one, but no luck...
Dtach and dvtm are separate features and both can replace tmux and
screen. A rewrite of tmux is
Hi there,
is there any less sucking screen/tmux replacement these days?
I just tried to find one, but no luck...
Thanks and best regards,
Anselm
22 matches
Mail list logo
