Hi all,
Thanks to everyone who participated. The vote to track and update SIP issues
according to the updated process has finished.
The vote PASSED with 5 binding +1, 1 non-binding +1, and 0 -1 votes:
Binding votes:
- Michael
- Craig
- Kamil
- John
- Diego
Non-binding votes:
- Antonio
Link to
+1 binding
On Thu, Sep 14, 2023, 19:47 John Bodley
wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 9:03 AM Kamil Gabryjelski <
> kamil.gabryjel...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > +1 binding
> >
> > > On 14 Sep 2023, at 05:30, Evan Rusackas wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > Since it seems the pro
+1 (binding)
On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 9:03 AM Kamil Gabryjelski <
kamil.gabryjel...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 binding
>
> > On 14 Sep 2023, at 05:30, Evan Rusackas wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Since it seems the process outlined in the SIP [1] has been largely
> non-controversial, I’d like to rais
+1 Binding
Antonio.
> On 14-09-2023, at 13:02, Kamil Gabryjelski
> wrote:
>
> +1 binding
>
>> On 14 Sep 2023, at 05:30, Evan Rusackas wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Since it seems the process outlined in the SIP [1] has been largely
>> non-controversial, I’d like to raise a VOTE
>>
>> Please
+1 binding
> On 14 Sep 2023, at 05:30, Evan Rusackas wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Since it seems the process outlined in the SIP [1] has been largely
> non-controversial, I’d like to raise a VOTE
>
> Please vote accordingly:
>
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove with the reaso
+1
- Craig
> On Sep 14, 2023, at 4:41 AM, Michael S. Molina
> wrote:
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> Best regards,
> Michael S. Molina
>
>> On 14 Sep 2023, at 00:30, Evan Rusackas wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Since it seems the process outlined in the SIP [1] has been largely
>> non-controversial,
+1 (binding)
Best regards,
Michael S. Molina
> On 14 Sep 2023, at 00:30, Evan Rusackas wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Since it seems the process outlined in the SIP [1] has been largely
> non-controversial, I’d like to raise a VOTE
>
> Please vote accordingly:
>
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinio
Hi all,
Since it seems the process outlined in the SIP [1] has been largely
non-controversial, I’d like to raise a VOTE
Please vote accordingly:
[ ] +1 approve
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
P.S. If this vote goes succeeds, we’ll add some tracking sessions to the
communit
