Re: Proposal for Telemetry via Scarf

2023-06-20 Thread Diego Pucci
+1 On Tue, Jun 20, 2023, 22:42 Ville Brofeldt wrote: > Hey all, > > getting more intel on the current installation base would be very welcome > for understanding where the community is feature and security wise. It's > great to hear other Apache projects have pre-validated this approach, but >

Re: Proposal for Telemetry via Scarf

2023-06-20 Thread Ville Brofeldt
Hey all, getting more intel on the current installation base would be very welcome for understanding where the community is feature and security wise. It's great to hear other Apache projects have pre-validated this approach, but let's make sure we're very transparent about what we're collecting

Re: Proposal for Telemetry via Scarf

2023-06-20 Thread Craig Rueda
+1 from me as well. Getting some more info on who is using Superset sounds awesome! -Craig On Fri, Jun 16, 2023 at 3:48 PM Maxime Beauchemin < maximebeauche...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1, telemetry enables us to be more informed and make informed decisions. > It's clear to me that all this is all

Re: Proposal for Telemetry via Scarf

2023-06-16 Thread Maxime Beauchemin
+1, telemetry enables us to be more informed and make informed decisions. It's clear to me that all this is all "PII" & identity free. Good to see other communities have gotten this approved and setup at the ASF Max On Fri, 16 Jun 2023 at 13:51, Evan Rusackas wrote: > Hi all, > > I wanted to

Proposal for Telemetry via Scarf

2023-06-16 Thread Evan Rusackas
Hi all, I wanted to float a new proposal regarding gathering Superset telemetry. The Superset dev community is constantly asking a few key questions about the installations of Superset in the wild, and we’ve been looking for a low-cost/low-effort opportunity to gather this telemetry data. We