Thanks for Tresdon, this is a good feature.
+1
- Grace
> On Jul 8, 2019, at 3:12 PM, Tresdon Jones wrote:
>
> Thanks for the insight!
>
> To address the migration concern for those who may have it – The DB
> migration now sets all dashboards to be published on migration so the UX of
> the
Thanks for the insight!
To address the migration concern for those who may have it – The DB
migration now sets all dashboards to be published on migration so the UX of
the users shouldn't change besides seeing a new "Published" badge next to
dashboards they own. For dashboards users don't own noth
+1 from me!
I think some of the delay for LGTM-ing this PR came from ensuring the db
migration would let us launch the feature without any change to the current
user experience. Also, the cognitive overhead from catching up on >50
comments for context. Regardless, I think that it's an awesome feat
Very glad to see such outstanding support for this feature!
I must say I'm a bit confused as to what and where the grievances /
blockers are because I'm not seeing them on the PR or on this thread. Are
they happening on some synchronous communication channel that I'm not
looped in on? I would like
+1. Would be useful to us.
Regards,
Matthew M. Mutiso
On Tue, 2 Jul 2019 at 20:32, Tresdon Jones wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I want to gather some sentiment around this PR which allows users to
> communicate whether their dashboards are for general consumption or for
> their own purposes (work to
