wan Linton
To: dev@synapse.apache.org
Sent: Friday, September 12, 2008 5:01 AM
Subject: Re: Proposal to implement ws-eventing and an event distribution
model in Synapse
Paul,
Very nice explanation of the concepts that we have been trying to put
together into the code. Let me add s
: Monday, September 15, 2008 6:33 AM
> To: dev@synapse.apache.org
> Subject: Fwd: Proposal to implement ws-eventing and an event
> distribution model in Synapse
>
> Any other comments on this? I know Ruwan is working on it and I know
> we would appreciate feedback and thoughts.
>
>
Asanka
The current implementation implements the following:
* A flexible model of storing subscriptions. A subscription is
logically some combination of a filter, a sequence and an endpoint.
This extends the WS-Eventing core model with the idea of a sequence.
* This model is implemented through a
Hi,
I'm not clear about the dynamic subscriptions, current implementation
will provide 3 options, using WS-Eventing, WS-Notification and user
define messages, how we are going to identify the subscription in the
user define mode ? What happens when a user unsubscribe for a static
subscriptions
rking on it and
I know
we would appreciate feedback and thoughts.
Paul
-- Forwarded message --
From: Paul Fremantle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 11:56 AM
Subject: Re: Proposal to implement ws-eventing and an event
distribution model in Synapse
To: dev@synapse
ughts.
Paul
-- Forwarded message --
From: Paul Fremantle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 11:56 AM
Subject: Re: Proposal to implement ws-eventing and an event
distribution model in Synapse
To: dev@synapse.apache.org
Ruwan
The reasons I think we should keep the
