This has caused a build failure. Please take a look.
Thanks,
Hiranya
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 12:03 AM, wrote:
> Author: supun
> Date: Tue Feb 15 18:33:50 2011
> New Revision: 1071005
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1071005&view=rev
> Log:
> changing the thread pool to have the default
Fixed it. Sorry for the trouble.
Thanks,
Supun..
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 10:49 PM, Hiranya Jayathilaka
wrote:
> This has caused a build failure. Please take a look.
>
> Thanks,
> Hiranya
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 12:03 AM, wrote:
>
>> Author: supun
>> Date: Tue Feb 15 18:33:50 2011
>> New R
This lead me to thinking, isn't it better to move to the JDK 1.6?
Thanks,
Supun..
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 10:55 AM, Supun Kamburugamuva wrote:
> Fixed it. Sorry for the trouble.
>
> Thanks,
> Supun..
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 10:49 PM, Hiranya Jayathilaka <
> hiranya...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
Should it not had been done for 2.0? We can say 1.x and 2.x not compatible
but 2 and 2.x ?
~ Indika
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 12:48 PM, Supun Kamburugamuva wrote:
> This lead me to thinking, isn't it better to move to the JDK 1.6?
>
> Thanks,
> Supun..
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 10:55 AM, Supu
I meant we should have done it for 2.0 as there were already API changes
that made 1.x and 2.x incompatible.
~ Indika
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 2:46 PM, indika kumara wrote:
> Should it not had been done for 2.0? We can say 1.x and 2.x not compatible
> but 2 and 2.x ?
>
> ~ Indika
>
>
> On Thu, F
