Build Update for Tirasa/SyncopeCamel
-
Build: #3
Status: Errored
Duration: 25 minutes and 33 seconds
Commit: 2914e49 (trunk)
Author: Hadrian Zbarcea
Message: Add license header to keep the rat plugin happy
View the changeset:
https://github.com/Tirasa/Syncope
Branch: refs/heads/trunk
Home: https://github.com/Tirasa/SyncopeCamel
Commit: 2914e498a3328397c0507d75859b9b28c304336d
https://github.com/Tirasa/SyncopeCamel/commit/2914e498a3328397c0507d75859b9b28c304336d
Author: Hadrian Zbarcea
Date: 2013-12-06 (Fri, 06 Dec 2013)
Changed
On 06/12/2013 16:17, Guido Wimmel wrote:
Hi,
I wouldn't keep Oliver from providing a patch wrt. his original request,
if he'd like to ;-)
Though if not, I can possibly also provide something - maybe next week.
I'm only unsure about which of the connection pool settings exactly should
be externa
Hi,
I wouldn't keep Oliver from providing a patch wrt. his original request,
if he'd like to ;-)
Though if not, I can possibly also provide something - maybe next week.
I'm only unsure about which of the connection pool settings exactly should
be externalized into properties, and about the isolat
Will do ;-)
Cheers
Oli
From: Francesco Chicchiriccò [ilgro...@apache.org]
Sent: 06 December 2013 13:22
To: dev@syncope.apache.org
Subject: Re: BasicDataSource usage in persistence.xml
On 06/12/2013 12:49, Guido Wimmel wrote:
> Hi Oliver,
>
> FYI: we use su
Build Update for Tirasa/SyncopeCamel
-
Build: #2
Status: Errored
Duration: 8 minutes and 34 seconds
Commit: 51cdd12 (trunk)
Author: Giacomo Lamonaco
Message: fixed issue #1
View the changeset:
https://github.com/Tirasa/SyncopeCamel/compare/3cf761884d61...51cd
Branch: refs/heads/trunk
Home: https://github.com/Tirasa/SyncopeCamel
Commit: c3163aa6738056f775657d3107b4349b65def90f
https://github.com/Tirasa/SyncopeCamel/commit/c3163aa6738056f775657d3107b4349b65def90f
Author: Francesco Chicchiriccò
Date: 2013-12-05 (Thu, 05 Dec 2013)
C
On 06/12/2013 12:49, Guido Wimmel wrote:
Hi Oliver,
FYI: we use such a setup (with dbcp.BasicDataSource) in our project, thus
avoiding the need to
configure a data source in the container. This works fine; also with our own
unit/integration tests.
We also used the standard MySQL isolation lev
Hi Oliver,
FYI: we use such a setup (with dbcp.BasicDataSource) in our project, thus
avoiding the need to
configure a data source in the container. This works fine; also with our own
unit/integration tests.
We also used the standard MySQL isolation level (REPEATABLE_READ), as we had
problems w
Hey Hadrian and Giacomo,
how things are proceeding? Are you facing some weird issues? Are you
close to the target?
Please keep us informed about your progresses :-)
Regards.
On 21/11/2013 08:37, Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote:
On 20/11/2013 20:12, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
I saw the proposal on
On 05/12/2013 21:47, Oliver Wulff wrote:
Hi there
Hi Oliver,
Wouldn't it make sense to use a BasicDataSource instead of
DriverManagerDataSource as it is also recommended from Spring:
http://docs.spring.io/spring/docs/current/spring-framework-reference/html/jdbc.html#jdbc-connections
Short
11 matches
Mail list logo