[jira] [Created] (SYNCOPE-1070) Conversion pattern ignored for date, long and double values during propagation

2017-04-21 Thread JIRA
Francesco Chicchiriccò created SYNCOPE-1070: --- Summary: Conversion pattern ignored for date, long and double values during propagation Key: SYNCOPE-1070 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYNCOPE-

[jira] [Commented] (SYNCOPE-1070) Conversion pattern ignored for date, long and double values during propagation

2017-04-21 Thread ASF subversion and git services (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYNCOPE-1070?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15978516#comment-15978516 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on SYNCOPE-1070: -- Com

[jira] [Commented] (SYNCOPE-1070) Conversion pattern ignored for date, long and double values during propagation

2017-04-21 Thread ASF subversion and git services (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYNCOPE-1070?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15978518#comment-15978518 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on SYNCOPE-1070: -- Com

[jira] [Commented] (SYNCOPE-1070) Conversion pattern ignored for date, long and double values during propagation

2017-04-21 Thread ASF subversion and git services (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYNCOPE-1070?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15978519#comment-15978519 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on SYNCOPE-1070: -- Com

[jira] [Resolved] (SYNCOPE-1070) Conversion pattern ignored for date, long and double values during propagation

2017-04-21 Thread JIRA
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYNCOPE-1070?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Francesco Chicchiriccò resolved SYNCOPE-1070. - Resolution: Fixed > Conversion pattern ignored for date, long and double

Re: [PROPOSAL] Get rid of JAXB

2017-04-21 Thread Francesco Chicchiriccò
Hi all, after some time it seems that this proposal is getting nowhere, and would anyway require some time I don't have right now nor plan to have in the near future. I am then going to delete the outdated 2_0_NO_JAXB branch. Regards. On 06/07/2016 09:39, Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote: Hi, FY