Hi,
I went ahead and created
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYNCOPE-1281
and
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SYNCOPE/%5BDISCUSS%5D+Privilege+management
for discussion.
Regards.
On 15/09/2017 08:49, Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote:
On 14/09/2017 18:36, Colm O hEigeartaigh wro
On 14/09/2017 18:36, Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote:
On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 8:47 AM, Francesco Chicchiriccò
wrote:
That's fine.
(SCIM? Are you working on something that might be useful for SYNCOPE-152?)
Yes, hopefully I will have some news on this soon.
Wow :-)
Is it a possibility to use the
On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 8:47 AM, Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote:
>
> That's fine.
> (SCIM? Are you working on something that might be useful for SYNCOPE-152?)
>
Yes, hopefully I will have some news on this soon.
>
> Is it a possibility to use the same schema definitions for AnyObjects etc.
>> fo
On 08/09/2017 16:33, Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote:
Hi Francesco,
On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 8:18 AM, Francesco Chicchiriccò
wrote:
Very practical reasons (as said elsewhere I believe): starting with 2.0,
Entitlements are no more database entities (as they used to be up to 1.2)
but Java constants.
O
Hi Francesco,
On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 8:18 AM, Francesco Chicchiriccò
wrote:
>
> Very practical reasons (as said elsewhere I believe): starting with 2.0,
> Entitlements are no more database entities (as they used to be up to 1.2)
> but Java constants.
>
OK thanks for the explanation.
> b) Perh
Hi Colm,
see my replies below.
Regards.
On 07/09/2017 18:20, Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote:
Hi Francesco,
A few further thoughts on this:
a) Instead of having both entitlements + privileges, would it make sense to
only have privileges, where the "entitlements" are privileges on the
Syncope applic
Hi Francesco,
A few further thoughts on this:
a) Instead of having both entitlements + privileges, would it make sense to
only have privileges, where the "entitlements" are privileges on the
Syncope application? It would seem less confusing and kind of neat to model
everything as a single concept
On 14/08/2017 19:12, Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote:
Hi Francesco,
Many thanks for your reply.
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 10:08 AM, Francesco Chicchiriccò
wrote:
Hi Colm,
thanks for bringing back this topic.
As said in the original thread mentioned above, I would stay as much
general as possible h
Hi Francesco,
Many thanks for your reply.
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 10:08 AM, Francesco Chicchiriccò <
ilgro...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi Colm,
> thanks for bringing back this topic.
>
> As said in the original thread mentioned above, I would stay as much
> general as possible here, because I think
On 26/07/2017 18:25, Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote:
Hi all,
Following the discussion earlier this year, I'd like to get a better idea
of what is required to support privileges in Syncope 2.1.0:
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/ba605687b7ed742350834a535b67bda8ab15fe56a4bb75c3dc2b98cd@%3Cdev.sync
Hi all,
Following the discussion earlier this year, I'd like to get a better idea
of what is required to support privileges in Syncope 2.1.0:
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/ba605687b7ed742350834a535b67bda8ab15fe56a4bb75c3dc2b98cd@%3Cdev.syncope.apache.org%3E
To summarise the problem - righ
11 matches
Mail list logo
