Re: [DISCUSS] Next releases

Hi all, update on this topic: all the three items below are now done. I have opened SYNCOPE-1332 to track the work around Java 9/10 on the master branch. IMO, we should focus now in defining what to put in 3.0.0. Regards. On 12/06/2018 16:46, Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote: Hi all, as you

Re: [DISCUSS] Next releases

Il 12/06/2018 16:46, Francesco Chicchiriccò ha scritto: Hi all, as you might have noticed, 2.0.9 is already full of fixes and new features as the OpenID Connect Client extension and the Docker images [1]. To me, the only blocker for proceeding with such release is the availability of CXF

Re: [DISCUSS] Next releases

Hi, sounds great to me! +1 Best regards, Matteo On 12/06/2018 16:46, Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote: Hi all, as you might have noticed, 2.0.9 is already full of fixes and new features as the OpenID Connect Client extension and the Docker images [1]. To me, the only blocker for proceeding with

Re: [DISCUSS] Next releases

+1, sounds good to me. Matteo On 12/06/2018 16:46, Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote: Hi all, as you might have noticed, 2.0.9 is already full of fixes and new features as the OpenID Connect Client extension and the Docker images [1]. To me, the only blocker for proceeding with such release is

Re: [DISCUSS] Next releases

Il 12/06/2018 16:46, Francesco Chicchiriccò ha scritto: Hi all, as you might have noticed, 2.0.9 is already full of fixes and new features as the OpenID Connect Client extension and the Docker images [1]. To me, the only blocker for proceeding with such release is the availability of CXF

[DISCUSS] Next releases

Hi all, as you might have noticed, 2.0.9 is already full of fixes and new features as the OpenID Connect Client extension and the Docker images [1]. To me, the only blocker for proceeding with such release is the availability of CXF 3.1.16, which should take place soon according to the

Re: [DISCUSS] Next releases

Hi all, as proposed below, I went ahead and created the 2_0_X maintenance branch from master, then set version 2.1.0-SNAPSHOT and JDK 1.8 for master. Regards. On 05/09/2016 17:21, Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote: +1. Colm. On Mon, Sep 5, 2016 at 4:16 PM, Francesco Chicchiriccò

Re: [DISCUSS] Next releases

+1. Colm. On Mon, Sep 5, 2016 at 4:16 PM, Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote: > Hi all, > as 2.0.0.M5 is done, we'll continue as scheduled with 2.0.0, possibly this > Friday. > > After that, I would like to > > 1. create 2_0_X for maintenance from master > 2. set version to

Re: [DISCUSS] Next releases

Hi all, as 2.0.0.M5 is done, we'll continue as scheduled with 2.0.0, possibly this Friday. After that, I would like to 1. create 2_0_X for maintenance from master 2. set version to 2.1.0-SNAPHOST + Java compatibility to 1.8 on master WDYT? On 2016-08-24 09:54 (+0200), Francesco Chicchiriccò

Re: [DISCUSS] Next releases

It does indeed. Thanks! On Sat, Sep 3, 2016 at 5:54 PM Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote: > On 01/09/2016 18:21, Tushar Mishra wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I wish to help solve the problem with the eclipse plugin. Can I know the > > details about it? Is there a JIRA issue or a build

Re: [DISCUSS] Next releases

On 01/09/2016 18:21, Tushar Mishra wrote: Hi, I wish to help solve the problem with the eclipse plugin. Can I know the details about it? Is there a JIRA issue or a build log that I can consult to start working on it? Or maybe you could explain the problem, so I can figure out the details

Re: [DISCUSS] Next releases

Hi all, I have solved - well, actually work-arounded - the problem as reported below, which is also the reason why next release will be 2.0.0.M5, not 2.0.0-M5 as originally planned. Updates to the release process will follow. Unfortunately, I have found another issue in the source artifact

Re: [DISCUSS] Next releases

FYI, I was trying to start the release process for 2.0.0-M5 as said below, but encountered some issues during the release:prepare phase, with Tycho (comprehensible being this the first release including the Eclipse plugin...) For the moment I have reverted all the changes I made: will try

Re: [DISCUSS] Next releases

On 24/08/2016 16:10, Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote: Sounds good to me, I'll restart looking at the documentation. Thanks Colm: this activity is *extremely* appreciated :-) Regards. On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 9:03 AM, Massimiliano Perrone wrote: + 1 Also because

Re: [DISCUSS] Next releases

Sounds good to me, I'll restart looking at the documentation. Colm. On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 9:03 AM, Massimiliano Perrone < massimiliano.perr...@tirasa.net> wrote: > > + 1 > Also because this is a very important release so I think it's better to > wait for half September when will start "the

Re: [DISCUSS] Next releases

+ 1 Also because this is a very important release so I think it's better to wait for half September when will start "the new year" and the people have surely finished their holidays. Regards, Massi -- Massimiliano Perrone Tel +39 393 9121310 Tirasa S.r.l. http://www.tirasa.net "L'apprendere

[DISCUSS] Next releases

Hi all, the work towards 2.0.0 seems to be almost complete: I should be able to finish the larger missing part (e.g. documentation as per SYNCOPE-700) by the end of this week. At that point I would like to cut the last milestone release 2.0.0-M5 (mainly to verify once more that the release