Il 20/12/2017 09:34, Francesco Chicchiriccò ha scritto:
On 20/12/2017 09:33, Fabio Martelli wrote:
Il 20/12/2017 08:56, Francesco Chicchiriccò ha scritto:
Hi all,
given the consensus, I am about to start the release process. Stay
tuned.
Hi Francesco, sorry but I just discovered a bug about the
On 20/12/2017 09:33, Fabio Martelli wrote:
Il 20/12/2017 08:56, Francesco Chicchiriccò ha scritto:
Hi all,
given the consensus, I am about to start the release process. Stay
tuned.
Hi Francesco, sorry but I just discovered a bug about the latest
yesterday changes.
I'm ready with a fix, please,
Il 20/12/2017 08:56, Francesco Chicchiriccò ha scritto:
Hi all,
given the consensus, I am about to start the release process. Stay tuned.
Hi Francesco, sorry but I just discovered a bug about the latest
yesterday changes.
I'm ready with a fix, please, let me perform some changes ant test
before
Hi all,
given the consensus, I am about to start the release process. Stay tuned.
Regards.
On 19/12/2017 08:50, Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote:
Hi all,
it seems quite some work has been done for 2.0.7 [1], and I believe
the remaining issues [2] can be safely moved to 2.0.8 (or later),
hence I w
+1.
Colm.
On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 10:43 AM, Lorenzo Di Cola wrote:
> +1 for me.
>
> Best Regards
>
> LDC
>
>
> Il 19/12/2017 08:50, Francesco Chicchiriccò ha scritto:
>
>> Hi all,
>> it seems quite some work has been done for 2.0.7 [1], and I believe the
>> remaining issues [2] can be safely mo
+1 for me.
Best Regards
LDC
Il 19/12/2017 08:50, Francesco Chicchiriccò ha scritto:
Hi all,
it seems quite some work has been done for 2.0.7 [1], and I believe
the remaining issues [2] can be safely moved to 2.0.8 (or later),
hence I was thinking: what about delivering Apache Syncope 2.0.7
+1
Filipe Silva
On 19-12-2017 07:50, Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote:
Hi all,
it seems quite some work has been done for 2.0.7 [1], and I believe
the remaining issues [2] can be safely moved to 2.0.8 (or later),
hence I was thinking: what about delivering Apache Syncope 2.0.7 as a
nice Christm
+1
Massi
Il 19/12/2017 08:50, Francesco Chicchiriccò ha scritto:
Hi all,
it seems quite some work has been done for 2.0.7 [1], and I believe
the remaining issues [2] can be safely moved to 2.0.8 (or later),
hence I was thinking: what about delivering Apache Syncope 2.0.7 as a
nice Christmas
Il 19 dicembre 2017 08:50:15 CET, "Francesco Chicchiriccò"
ha scritto:
>Hi all,
>it seems quite some work has been done for 2.0.7 [1], and I believe the
>
>remaining issues [2] can be safely moved to 2.0.8 (or later), hence I
>was thinking: what about delivering Apache Syncope 2.0.7 as a nice
Hi all,
it looks like it is the right moment to me.
Matteo.
On 19/12/2017 08:50, Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote:
Hi all,
it seems quite some work has been done for 2.0.7 [1], and I believe
the remaining issues [2] can be safely moved to 2.0.8 (or later),
hence I was thinking: what about deliv
Hi,
it sounds very good to me, +1.
Regards and merry Christmas to all!
Matteo Alessandroni
On 19/12/2017 08:50, Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote:
Hi all,
it seems quite some work has been done for 2.0.7 [1], and I believe
the remaining issues [2] can be safely moved to 2.0.8 (or later),
hence I
Definitely +1,
Best regards and merry Christmas to all! 🎄
Andrea
Il giorno 19 dic 2017, 08:50, alle ore 08:50, "Francesco Chicchiriccò"
ha scritto:
>Hi all,
>it seems quite some work has been done for 2.0.7 [1], and I believe the
>
>remaining issues [2] can be safely moved to 2.0.8 (or later),
Hi all,
it seems quite some work has been done for 2.0.7 [1], and I believe the
remaining issues [2] can be safely moved to 2.0.8 (or later), hence I
was thinking: what about delivering Apache Syncope 2.0.7 as a nice
Christmas present to our community?
Do you see any issue with that?
Regards.
13 matches
Mail list logo