te a Jira.
Has anybody better solution? Do we need some more experiments?
Cheers,
Andrei.
> -Original Message-
> From: Fabio Martelli [mailto:fabio.marte...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Dienstag, 29. Januar 2013 10:16
> To: dev@syncope.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [Question] Problem with tes
-Original Message-
>> From: Fabio Martelli [mailto:fabio.marte...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Dienstag, 29. Januar 2013 09:40
>> To: Andrei Shakirin
>> Cc: dev@syncope.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: [Question] Problem with test UsertTestITCase.issueSYNCOPE279
>>
tualAttribute
>
> Generally I would propose to design integration tests as independent as
> possible. Dependencies between different test cases and individual tests
> makes error analyse extreme difficult and time consuming. Ideally integration
> test should leave environment uncha
ficult and time consuming. Ideally integration test
should leave environment unchanged or compensated.
WDYT?
Regards,
Andrei.
> -Original Message-
> From: Fabio Martelli [mailto:fabio.marte...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Montag, 28. Januar 2013 16:42
> To: dev@syncope.apache.org
> Subject
Hi Andrei, answers and comment inline.
Il giorno 28/gen/2013, alle ore 16.09, Andrei Shakirin ha scritto:
> Hi,
>
> I am analysing problem regarding UsertTestITCase.issueSYNCOPE279().
> It is reproducible in following situations:
>
> 1) Run it as single test: mvn -Pdev -DwaitForCheck=false
Hi,
I am analysing problem regarding UsertTestITCase.issueSYNCOPE279().
It is reproducible in following situations:
1) Run it as single test: mvn -Pdev -DwaitForCheck=false -Dit.test=
UserTestITCase# issueSYNCOPE279
Because of some reasons this test is succeed in case if
AuthenticationTes
