Hi Francesco,
Gesendet: Dienstag, 10. Dezember 2013 um 10:20 Uhr
Von: Francesco Chicchiriccò ilgro...@apache.org
Gesendet: Montag, 09. Dezember 2013 um 22:22 Uhr
Von: Oliver Wulff owu...@talend.com
@Guido, is the property connectionProperties sufficient which is a
semi-colon
.
Thanks
Oli
From: Francesco Chicchiriccò [ilgro...@apache.org]
Sent: 09 December 2013 09:29
To: dev@syncope.apache.org
Subject: Re: BasicDataSource usage in persistence.xml
On 08/12/2013 14:54, Oliver Wulff wrote:
Hi there
JIRA raised and patch applied
BasicDataSource dependent. But maybe
the connectionProperties property is sufficient.
Thanks
Oli
From: Francesco Chicchiriccò [ilgro...@apache.org]
Sent: 09 December 2013 09:29
To: dev@syncope.apache.org
Subject: Re: BasicDataSource usage in persistence.xml
On 08/12
: BasicDataSource usage in persistence.xml
Will do ;-)
Cheers
Oli
From: Francesco Chicchiriccò [ilgro...@apache.org]
Sent: 06 December 2013 13:22
To: dev@syncope.apache.org
Subject: Re: BasicDataSource usage in persistence.xml
On 06/12/2013 12:49, Guido
On 05/12/2013 21:47, Oliver Wulff wrote:
Hi there
Hi Oliver,
Wouldn't it make sense to use a BasicDataSource instead of
DriverManagerDataSource as it is also recommended from Spring:
http://docs.spring.io/spring/docs/current/spring-framework-reference/html/jdbc.html#jdbc-connections
Short
Hi Oliver,
FYI: we use such a setup (with dbcp.BasicDataSource) in our project, thus
avoiding the need to
configure a data source in the container. This works fine; also with our own
unit/integration tests.
We also used the standard MySQL isolation level (REPEATABLE_READ), as we had
problems
On 06/12/2013 12:49, Guido Wimmel wrote:
Hi Oliver,
FYI: we use such a setup (with dbcp.BasicDataSource) in our project, thus
avoiding the need to
configure a data source in the container. This works fine; also with our own
unit/integration tests.
We also used the standard MySQL isolation
in persistence.xml
Will do ;-)
Cheers
Oli
From: Francesco Chicchiriccò [ilgro...@apache.org]
Sent: 06 December 2013 13:22
To: dev@syncope.apache.org
Subject: Re: BasicDataSource usage in persistence.xml
On 06/12/2013 12:49, Guido Wimmel wrote:
Hi Oliver,
FYI: we
Hi there
Wouldn't it make sense to use a BasicDataSource instead of
DriverManagerDataSource as it is also recommended from Spring:
http://docs.spring.io/spring/docs/current/spring-framework-reference/html/jdbc.html#jdbc-connections
Instead of this:
bean id=localDataSource
