RE: CXF REST migration plan

2013-01-02 Thread Jan Bernhardt
iriccò [mailto:ilgro...@apache.org] > Sent: Freitag, 21. Dezember 2012 10:10 > To: dev@syncope.apache.org > Subject: Re: CXF REST migration plan > > On 21/12/2012 09:59, Christian Schneider wrote: > > Hi Francesco, > > > > it is a good idea to release a 1.1.0

Re: CXF REST migration plan

2012-12-21 Thread Christian Schneider
I just added the patch for SYNCOPE-241. The separation of the API seems to work fine. I also added an issue https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYNCOPE-259 to track introducing a UserService and switch the tests and client code to it. As you see from the UserTestITCase the change is quite small.

Re: CXF REST migration plan

2012-12-21 Thread Francesco Chicchiriccò
nk as soon as 1.1.0 will be released. Would like to hear opinions from others as well. Cheers, Andrei. -Original Message- From: Francesco Chicchiriccò [mailto:ilgro...@apache.org] Sent: Donnerstag, 20. Dezember 2012 17:09 To: dev@syncope.apache.org Subject: Re: CXF REST migration plan

Re: CXF REST migration plan

2012-12-21 Thread Colm O hEigeartaigh
to 1.2.0-SNAPSHOT, we can start with the > plan > > you propose above. > > WDYT? > > Personally I agree with your arguments. Perhaps in this case it makes > sense for us to start preparations before end of January (not in trunk). > Then steps (a) - (e) will be committed

Re: CXF REST migration plan

2012-12-21 Thread Francesco Chicchiriccò
On 21/12/2012 09:59, Christian Schneider wrote: Hi Francesco, it is a good idea to release a 1.1.0 version before we introduce the cxf depdendencies. What parts of our plan do you think can go into trunk and what should wait till after the 1.1.0 release? My proposal is this: On 20.12.2012 17:

Re: CXF REST migration plan

2012-12-21 Thread Christian Schneider
Hi Francesco, it is a good idea to release a 1.1.0 version before we introduce the cxf depdendencies. What parts of our plan do you think can go into trunk and what should wait till after the 1.1.0 release? My proposal is this: On 20.12.2012 17:08, Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote: > On 20/12/2012

Re: CXF REST migration plan

2012-12-21 Thread Fabio Martelli
ear opinions from others as well. Hi guys, I like very much CXF migration plan but I agree with Francesco about the release plan: 1. plan completion seems to take long (1.1.0 release wold be delayed too much without any good reason) 2. CXF interface is something completely new (not yet planned in r

Re: CXF REST migration plan

2012-12-20 Thread Francesco Chicchiriccò
-Original Message- From: Francesco Chicchiriccò [mailto:ilgro...@apache.org] Sent: Donnerstag, 20. Dezember 2012 17:09 To: dev@syncope.apache.org Subject: Re: CXF REST migration plan On 20/12/2012 16:44, Andrei Shakirin wrote: Hi, We just finished CXF migration POC for users and roles: it is successful

RE: CXF REST migration plan

2012-12-20 Thread Andrei Shakirin
i. > -Original Message- > From: Francesco Chicchiriccò [mailto:ilgro...@apache.org] > Sent: Donnerstag, 20. Dezember 2012 17:09 > To: dev@syncope.apache.org > Subject: Re: CXF REST migration plan > > On 20/12/2012 16:44, Andrei Shakirin wrote: > > Hi, > > >

Re: CXF REST migration plan

2012-12-20 Thread Francesco Chicchiriccò
On 20/12/2012 16:44, Andrei Shakirin wrote: Hi, We just finished CXF migration POC for users and roles: it is successful and we approximately know how much efforts we need for complete migration. I would like to discuss the steps we are going to do for complete migration in next year. 1.

CXF REST migration plan

2012-12-20 Thread Andrei Shakirin
Hi, We just finished CXF migration POC for users and roles: it is successful and we approximately know how much efforts we need for complete migration. I would like to discuss the steps we are going to do for complete migration in next year. 1. Prerequisites a) Finishing persistenc