Thanks!
Best regards.
Jan
-Original Message-
From: ilgrosso [mailto:ilgro...@apache.org]
Sent: Mittwoch, 23. Januar 2013 11:28
To: dev@syncope.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Moving issues from one version to another
Hi all,
as discussed before in this thread, I've just moved
Il giorno 21/gen/2013, alle ore 11.46, Francesco Chicchiriccò ha scritto:
Hi all,
following our recent discussion [1], I'd propose to:
1. move SYNCOPE-231 (e.g. CXF migration) and all subtasks to 1.1.0
2. move SYNCOPE-275 (Upgrade Spring to 3.2) to 1.1.0 as it requires
SYNCOPE-231
3.
On 21/01/2013 12:00, Fabio Martelli wrote:
Il giorno 21/gen/2013, alle ore 11.46, Francesco Chicchiriccò ha scritto:
Hi all,
following our recent discussion [1], I'd propose to:
1. move SYNCOPE-231 (e.g. CXF migration) and all subtasks to 1.1.0
2. move SYNCOPE-275 (Upgrade Spring to 3.2) to
Il giorno 21/gen/2013, alle ore 12.04, Francesco Chicchiriccò ha scritto:
On 21/01/2013 12:00, Fabio Martelli wrote:
Il giorno 21/gen/2013, alle ore 11.46, Francesco Chicchiriccò ha scritto:
Hi all,
following our recent discussion [1], I'd propose to:
1. move SYNCOPE-231 (e.g. CXF
On 21/01/2013 12:47, Fabio Martelli wrote:
[...]
I think that SYNCOPE-122 and SYNCOPE-135 will not make the difference in
reference to the load.
I disagree on this point: anyway, keeping SYNCOPE-122 in 1.1.0 (point 4
of my initial checklist) and moving SYNCOPE-135 and SYNCOPE-136 from
1.2.0
On 21/01/2013 13:51, Jan Bernhardt wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Francesco Chicchiriccò [mailto:ilgro...@apache.org]
Sent: Montag, 21. Januar 2013 13:18
To: dev@syncope.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Moving issues from one version to another
On 21/01/2013 12:47, Fabio Martelli
