+1 for "Apache Syncope authentication" for now.
Potentially can be customized as well.
> -Original Message-
> From: Sergey Beryozkin [mailto:sberyoz...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Donnerstag, 28. Februar 2013 17:40
> To: dev@syncope.apache.org
> Subject: Re: BasicAuth real
On 27/02/13 14:27, Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote:
Hi Sergey,
I guess using the name of the framework might be problematic when using
Syncope within some custom deployments; I'd vote for getting the realm name
customized via a property, and defaulted to a more neutral name as
suggested (say Identit
Hi Sergey,
I guess using the name of the framework might be problematic when using
> Syncope within some custom deployments; I'd vote for getting the realm name
> customized via a property, and defaulted to a more neutral name as
> suggested (say Identity Provision or Management, etc) or may be j
Hi
On 27/02/13 07:49, Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote:
On 26/02/2013 23:03, Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote:
Hi all,
The core's RestServiceExceptionMapper defines the following:
private static final String BASIC_REALM_UNAUTHORIZED = "Basic
realm=\"Spring Security Application\"";
I propose to change th
+1
Sounds good
On 27.02.2013 08:49, Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote:
On 26/02/2013 23:03, Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote:
Hi all,
The core's RestServiceExceptionMapper defines the following:
private static final String BASIC_REALM_UNAUTHORIZED = "Basic
realm=\"Spring Security Application\"";
I prop
On 26/02/2013 23:03, Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote:
Hi all,
The core's RestServiceExceptionMapper defines the following:
private static final String BASIC_REALM_UNAUTHORIZED = "Basic
realm=\"Spring Security Application\"";
I propose to change this to a more neutral realm, as this appears when
auth
