Re: [PROPOSAL] R4ML Integration with SystemML

2017-09-21 Thread alok singh
Hi   We (me and Brendan) has been focusing on other things  like journeys apart from new MLCtx changes. R4ML commits and PR you can also review, I think code will definitely be maintained. Alok From: Deron Eriksson Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2017 6:03 PM To: dev@systemml.apache.org Subj

Re: [PROPOSAL] R4ML Integration with SystemML

2017-09-21 Thread Deron Eriksson
> > * Looking over the github repo, apparently R4ML is not under active > development/maintenance anymore (last commit Jul 20). So who would be > willing to maintain and extend it? > > ALOK: We will doing development into it . there are open PR already. > > No commits since Jul 20 does raise warnin

Re: [PROPOSAL] R4ML Integration with SystemML

2017-09-21 Thread alok singh
FYI I couldn't reply to older thread so needed to create this thread from new hotmail account From: alok singh Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2017 4:47 PM To: dev@systemml.apache.org Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] R4ML Integration with SystemML   @niketan I think it will be diff than python api,

Re: [PROPOSAL] R4ML Integration with SystemML

2017-09-21 Thread alok singh
@niketan I think it will be diff than python api, this is more of the product where one can execute various R flows plus many helper functions like preprocessor (diff than systemML) various sampler, various utils so it being the interface is misnomer Alok F

Re: [PROPOSAL] R4ML Integration with SystemML

2017-09-21 Thread alok singh
Sorry missed Matthias second question. Yes we can plan but based on talking to few R users having just DML execute capability vs R like matrix ops , we can discuss but currently it is in not in plan From: alok singh Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2017 4:44 PM

Re: [PROPOSAL] R4ML Integration with SystemML

2017-09-21 Thread alok singh
Answers: * Looking over the github repo, apparently R4ML is not under active development/maintenance anymore (last commit Jul 20). So who would be willing to maintain and extend it? ALOK: We will doing development into it . there are open PR already. * Providing wrappers for our algorithm scrip

[PROPOSAL] R4ML Integration with SystemML

2017-09-21 Thread alok singh
Hi All, I just  This in ref to the thread using new id so can't reply to thread "[DISCUSS] R-Interface to SystemML" Thanks Deron and Matthias and Niketon for the feedback. I will create the official proposal next week and send the details. I will have some emails now. Here I am just copy pas

Re: [DISCUSS] R-Interface to SystemML

2017-09-21 Thread Brendan Dwyer
Sorry for not responding sooner. I had some issues with my email client. I will do my best to address as many as the points that have been raised as I can. Hopefully Alok will be able to jump in as well once he resolves his email issues. - I would be happy to help maintain R4ML in SystemM

Re: [DISCUSS] R-Interface to SystemML

2017-09-21 Thread Matthias Boehm
I pretty much agree with Niketan and Deron. In general, it would be useful to provide an R API as well. However, I'm a bit concerned for two reasons: * Looking over the github repo, apparently R4ML is not under active development/maintenance anymore (last commit Jul 20). So who would be willing to

Re: [DISCUSS] R-Interface to SystemML

2017-09-21 Thread Deron Eriksson
I agree with Niketan. An R interface definitely makes sense for SystemML. DML itself is based on R, so it's surprising we have Java/Scala/Python interfaces to SystemML but we don't have an R interface. Perhaps R4ML committers could supply a little more info? For instance: 1) Would they like to mer

Jenkins build became unstable: SystemML-DailyTest #1249

2017-09-21 Thread jenkins
See

Re: [DISCUSS] R-Interface to SystemML

2017-09-21 Thread Niketan Pansare
Janardhan: I believe this is the R4ML repo: https://github.com/SparkTC/r4ml . Arvind: please correct me if I am wrong. Overall, having a R interface for SystemML is an awesome idea. Since I am not an R4ML expert, may be R4ML committers can comment on how they envision "two code streams to work to

Re: file location for `import org.apache.sysml.parser.dml.DmlParser.WhileStatementContext`

2017-09-21 Thread Janardhan Pulivarthi
Thanks, Ted Yu. I am implementing builtin `xor(0, 0)` for example, do the following snippet will generate the context that is needed. Here https://github.com/ apache/systemml/blob/master/src/main/java/org/apache/ sysml/parser/dml/Dml.g4#L154 op=('xor') '(' left=expression ',' right=expression ')'

Re: file location for `import org.apache.sysml.parser.dml.DmlParser.WhileStatementContext`

2017-09-21 Thread Ted Yu
I believe it is generated class. See the following from docs/beginners-guide-caffe2dml.md : Dml.g4 ---> antlr ---> DmlLexer.java, DmlListener.java, DmlParser.java ---> parse foo.dml On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 9:01 AM, Janardhan Pulivarthi < janardhan.pulivar...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Ca

file location for `import org.apache.sysml.parser.dml.DmlParser.WhileStatementContext`

2017-09-21 Thread Janardhan Pulivarthi
Hi, Can somebody point me out the `DmlParser` class?. where this file is being imported from `import org.apache.sysml.parser.dml.DmlParser.WhileStatementContext` Thanks.

Re: [DISCUSS] R-Interface to SystemML

2017-09-21 Thread Janardhan
Hi Arvind, This is a great idea. One question: the R4ML generates any plan like the SystemML with `DML` Or with providing some interface we leverage this feature ?. Community effort in the sense of collaborative algorithm implementation.(?) Is this the Spark-R repo ( https://github.com/rstudio/

Jenkins build is back to stable : SystemML-DailyTest #1248

2017-09-21 Thread jenkins
See