experience.
Fred
From: dusenberr...@gmail.com
To: dev@systemml.apache.org
Date: 09/22/2017 06:24 PM
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] R4ML Integration with SystemML
Adding an R interface to SystemML would be great. I would suggest, in
agreement with others here, that the MLContext API be expos
Adding an R interface to SystemML would be great. I would suggest, in
agreement with others here, that the MLContext API be exposed in the R4ML
package so that users *could* run arbitrary DML code from R. Past that, I
wouldn't worry about making the rest exactly compatible with mllearn at this
>
> >> So I was thinking is it absolutely must have to sync between api?
>
> Soft-yes, we should try our best to do so.
>
There are many benefits both for SystemML users and developers to having
the APIs be as consistent as possible. Based on user feedback, I know
Niketan and Glenn did a lot of wo
From: Niketan Pansare
Sent: Friday, September 22, 2017 3:10 PM
To: dev@systemml.apache.org
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] R4ML Integration with SystemML
>> a) Does it mean you are proposing spliting R4ML into two R-wrapper and R4ML?
I was only suggesting h
so.
Thanks,
Niketan Pansare
IBM Almaden Research Center
E-mail: npansar At us.ibm.com
http://researcher.watson.ibm.com/researcher/view.php?person=us-npansar
From: alok singh
To: "dev@systemml.apache.org"
Date: 09/22/2017 02:40 PM
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] R4ML Integration
see comments Alok:
From: Niketan Pansare
Sent: Friday, September 22, 2017 2:11 PM
To: dev@systemml.apache.org
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] R4ML Integration with SystemML
>>> As pointed out earlier, R4ML is not just R interface so it is based on the
>>> earlier product of I
singh
To: "dev@systemml.apache.org" ,
"de...@apache.org"
Date: 09/22/2017 12:30 PM
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] R4ML Integration with SystemML
Here are Niketan's question
Thanks for taking time to answer our questions and also for considering t
From: alok singh
Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2017 7:32 PM
To: dev@systemml.apache.org; de...@apache.org
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] R4ML Integration with SystemML
Hi
We (me and Brendan) has been focusing on other things like journeys apart
from new MLCtx changes. R4ML commits and PR you ca
>
>
> > 1) Would they like to merge R4ML code into the main SystemML project
> ALOK: In R we have to follow a pattern dir structure. we might be able to
> create more R pacakges. There will be a sub dir in systemML called R or
> something
> in that subdir there will be subdir R4ML (one R pacakge) i
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] R4ML Integration with SystemML
>
> * Looking over the github repo, apparently R4ML is not under active
> development/maintenance anymore (last commit Jul 20). So who would be
> willing to maintain and extend it?
>
> ALOK: We will doing development into i
>
> * Looking over the github repo, apparently R4ML is not under active
> development/maintenance anymore (last commit Jul 20). So who would be
> willing to maintain and extend it?
>
> ALOK: We will doing development into it . there are open PR already.
>
>
No commits since Jul 20 does raise warnin
FYI I couldn't reply to older thread so needed to create this thread from new
hotmail account
From: alok singh
Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2017 4:47 PM
To: dev@systemml.apache.org
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] R4ML Integration with SystemML
@niketan I think it will be diff than pytho
From: alok singh
Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2017 4:45 PM
To: dev@systemml.apache.org
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] R4ML Integration with SystemML
Sorry missed Matthias second question.
Yes we can plan but based on talking to few R users having just DML execute
capability vs R like matrix ops , we
To: dev@systemml.apache.org
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] R4ML Integration with SystemML
Answers:
* Looking over the github repo, apparently R4ML is not under active
development/maintenance anymore (last commit Jul 20). So who would be
willing to maintain and extend it?
ALOK: We will doing
nto SystemML testing framework).
ALOK: testing will usually by the maven system command exec where it just calls
cd ; ./bin/install_all
> 8) How is this packaged?
ALOK:subdir
From: alok singh
Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2017 4:38 PM
To: dev@systemml.apache.org
Sub
Hi All,
I just This in ref to the thread using new id so can't reply to thread
"[DISCUSS] R-Interface to SystemML"
Thanks Deron and Matthias and Niketon for the feedback.
I will create the official proposal next week and send the details.
I will have some emails now.
Here I am just copy pas
16 matches
Mail list logo
