Re: Starting a SystemML 0.9 release

2016-01-14 Thread Mike Dusenberry
The DML Language Reference would be great to have as well. Also, in general, I think we should only have the Javadocs for end-user facing code, such MLContext, rather than for any deep internals that a user is not going to interact with. On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 6:26 PM Luciano Resende

Re: SystemML JIRA Site Is Live!

2016-01-14 Thread Luciano Resende
-1 for disabling it all With this, we get no notification weather a jira is created, etc. An example is that I created SYSTEMML-462 and the list archives has no indication of the jira created. We should get some indication of jira workflow on our mailing lists. If people does not want to flood

Re: SystemML JIRA Site Is Live!

2016-01-14 Thread Matthias Boehm
well, I would be fine with a separate mailing list although it's redundant to the jira feed. Regards, Matthias From: Mike Dusenberry To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org Date: 01/14/2016 02:51 PM Subject:Re: SystemML JIRA Site Is Live! I vote for

Re: SystemML JIRA Site Is Live!

2016-01-14 Thread Mike Dusenberry
I vote for creating a separate mailing list specifically for JIRA issues. That way, we won't lose track of valuable conversations on the dev list amidst the JIRA issue flow. On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 2:37 PM Luciano Resende wrote: > -1 for disabling it all > > With this, we