Hi,
With regards to #1, we have an existing JIRA for this
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYSTEMML-134 . I'll update this one.
A few other things I've noticed:
1) docs/README.txt in standalone distributions (and the other *.tar.gz and
*.zip) have references to BIGINSIGHTS_HOME. This is sam
This vote is canceled.
Please create tasks under the umbrela jira for us to track the issues being
raised.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYSTEMML-463
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 1:36 PM, Mike Dusenberry
wrote:
> Upon further review, I've found multiple issues with the "standalone"
> pack
Upon further review, I've found multiple issues with the "standalone" package
that should block this release candidate.
1. The "readme.txt" in the "standalone" distribution refers to a
"jSystemML.jar" file that will be generated for the user to allow the use of
"java -jar jSystemML.jar". H
Just to clarify because there seems to be some confusion: we are supporting
any Spark version >=1.4 and Hadoop version >=2.4. The only reason why our
build sticks to older versions is to avoid exploiting new features too
eagerly which would loose backwards compatibility if done without care.
With
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 12:50 PM, Deron Eriksson
wrote:
> Does SystemML still support Hadoop 1?
>
> I see in MRConfigurationNames a static initialization block for Hadoop
> v1/v2 properties. I'd like to remove the current deprecated property
> warnings (log messages in the console) that we get wi
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 12:30 PM, Deron Eriksson
wrote:
> I have a question (mostly for Luciano).
>
> I'm examining the release candidate files to try to verify that our
> candidate files are compliant with the Apache release management policy (
> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagem
Does SystemML still support Hadoop 1?
I see in MRConfigurationNames a static initialization block for Hadoop
v1/v2 properties. I'd like to remove the current deprecated property
warnings (log messages in the console) that we get with Hadoop v2.4.1 and I
was wondering if I should add the old v1 and
I have a question (mostly for Luciano).
I'm examining the release candidate files to try to verify that our
candidate files are compliant with the Apache release management policy (
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html).
I see under the Release Check List (
http://incubator.a
Sounds good. We can follow that workflow and modify it as we need to.
I added Nakul as a contributor and assigned the JIRA to him.
Deron
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 5:28 AM, Mike Dusenberry
wrote:
> I vote yes, let's use Deron's suggestion. It's simple, and assigning a JIRA
> issue when the user r
+1
Niketan Pansare
IBM Almaden Research Center
E-mail: npansar At us.ibm.com
http://researcher.watson.ibm.com/researcher/view.php?person=us-npansar
From: dusenberr...@gmail.com
To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
Date: 01/20/2016 05:30 AM
Subject:Re: [VOTE] Release SystemML 0.
well, I would prefer to use common sense here instead of a fixed workflow.
There are many different scenarios of external contributions w/ or w/o JIRA
- one size does not fit all. In general, we should create an atmosphere
were we encourage people to contribute. However, if a new user likes to
tak
+1
--
Mike Dusenberry
GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw
LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry
Sent from my iPhone.
> On Jan 20, 2016, at 3:39 AM, Frederick R Reiss wrote:
>
>
> +1
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>>> On Jan 20, 2016, at 11:06 AM, Shirish Tatikonda
>> wrote:
>>
>> +1
>>
>>
>
I vote yes, let's use Deron's suggestion. It's simple, and assigning a JIRA
issue when the user requests to start working on it avoids the issue of
duplicated work.
- Mike
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 1:49 AM Frederick R Reiss
wrote:
> Shall we use Deron's suggestion below as our process for the time
+1
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jan 20, 2016, at 11:06 AM, Shirish Tatikonda
wrote:
>
> +1
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 9:46 PM, Luciano Resende
> wrote:
>
>> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache SystemML
version
>> 0.9.0!
>>
>> The vote is open for at least 72 hours and w
+1
On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 9:46 PM, Luciano Resende
wrote:
> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache SystemML version
> 0.9.0!
>
> The vote is open for at least 72 hours and will close on Saturday, January
> 23 and passes if a majority of at least 3 +1 PMC votes are cast.
>
Shall we use Deron's suggestion below as our process for the time being?
Fred
From: Luciano Resende
To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
Date: 01/18/2016 03:08 PM
Subject:Re: Workflow for assigning issues to users
On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 1:54 PM, Deron Eriksson
wrote:
>
16 matches
Mail list logo