+1 on #4.
Regards,
Berthold Reinwald
IBM Almaden Research Center
office: (408) 927 2208; T/L: 457 2208
e-mail: reinw...@us.ibm.com
From: Luciano Resende
To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
Date: 10/21/2016 04:37 PM
Subject:Re: [VOTE] SystemML New Logo Ideas
On Fri, Oct 21,
Thanks, Imran. I think it is a good idea to start off with the DML-bodied
function implementation. This will hold until we can have a built in
implementation.
We prototyped an implementation of distributed Cholesky as a DML bodied
function as well. For performance optimization, as the matrix be
Hi,
There is an initial implementation and PR.
https://github.com/apache/incubator-systemml/pull/273
-Nakul
> On Oct 24, 2016, at 12:59 AM, Berthold Reinwald wrote:
>
> Thanks, Imran. I think it is a good idea to start off with the DML-bodied
> function implementation. This will hold until
Would it be acceptable for a user to receive a log warning if the user uses
an operation that is currently only implemented for single node? My concern
is that there is an expectation for operations to be distributed with
SystemML, and if an operation is not currently distributed, the user needs
to
well, we still compute memory estimates for these operations. So I
guess, a good compromise would be to raise a warning whenever the memory
estimate is known to exceed the local memory budget.
Regards,
Matthias
On 10/24/2016 8:29 PM, Deron Eriksson wrote:
Would it be acceptable for a user to
if I remember correctly then it is not trivial to accurately estimate the
memory foot print for these commons math functions at compile time
depending on what intermediates they produce ... Meaning you may still end
up with java heap space OOM at runtime.
Regards,
Berthold Reinwald
IBM Almaden
Indeed, some of these operations do allocate additional data structures.
Other problems were (1) that our memory estimates do not account for the
explicit copy into commons math data structures (e.g.,
Array2DRowRealMatrix), and (2) unnecessarily raised exceptions due to
unknowns. However, both
Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache SystemML version
0.11.0-incubating !
The vote is open for at least 72 hours and passes if a majority of at least
3 +1 PMC votes are cast.
[ ] +1 Release this package as Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating
[ ] -1 Do not release this package
+1
On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 2:08 PM, Acs S wrote:
> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache SystemML version
> 0.11.0-incubating !
>
> The vote is open for at least 72 hours and passes if a majority of at least
> 3 +1 PMC votes are cast.
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apach
Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache SystemML version
0.11.0-incubating !
The vote is open for at least 72 hours and passes if a majority of at least
3 +1 PMC votes are cast.
[ ] +1 Release this package as Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating
[ ] -1 Do not release this package
-1
These have the links to wrong maven artifacts, etc. I have sent new vote
thread.
On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 11:08 PM, Acs S wrote:
> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache SystemML version
> 0.11.0-incubating !
>
> The vote is open for at least 72 hours and passes if a major
Dear podling,
This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache
Incubator PMC. It is an initial reminder to give you plenty of time to
prepare your quarterly board report.
The board meeting is scheduled for Wed, 16 November 2016, 10:30 am PDT.
The report for your podling will for
I have a few questions on the contents of the website in the master branch :
Initial page:
- What's the intention of the section just above the social banner ? I
noticed it was actually a copy of a section from the community page, but it
looks like the content was duplicated and not extracted to
13 matches
Mail list logo