Re: SystemML 0.11.0-incubating RC4 feedback

2016-10-31 Thread Acs S
These issues can/should be documented under "known issues" in release note. -Arvind From: Acs S To: "dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org" Sent: Monday, October 31, 2016 9:10 PM Subject: Re: SystemML 0.11.0-incubating RC4 feedback SYSTEMML-1076, SYSTEMML-1077 issues are related to exp

Re: SystemML 0.11.0-incubating RC4 feedback

2016-10-31 Thread Acs S
For now, we should document every artifacts being created in release doc (and/or website), which can be updated when artifacts get reduced. -Arvind From: Acs S To: "dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org" Sent: Monday, October 31, 2016 9:13 PM Subject: Re: SystemML 0.11.0-incubating RC4 fe

Re: SystemML 0.11.0-incubating RC4 feedback

2016-10-31 Thread Acs S
For some reason, I got an impression that artifacts reduction was completed earlier, but apparently its not.We are trying to reduce number of artifacts to avoid confusion to users.This is an issue from earlier releases as well, not being introduced as a part of SystemML 0.11 release. We can addr

Re: SystemML 0.11.0-incubating RC4 feedback

2016-10-31 Thread Acs S
SYSTEMML-1076, SYSTEMML-1077 issues are related to experimental feature DeepLearning/GPU being added to SystemML 0.11. These issues are specific to condition articulated in Jira's.We should have Jira opened and fixed before we can support DeepLearning/GPU fully.For now these should not be "Block

Podling Report Reminder - November 2016

2016-10-31 Thread johndament
Dear podling, This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache Incubator PMC. It is an initial reminder to give you plenty of time to prepare your quarterly board report. The board meeting is scheduled for Wed, 16 November 2016, 10:30 am PDT. The report for your podling will for

Re: SystemML 0.11.0-incubating RC4 feedback

2016-10-31 Thread dusenberrymw
There are also two bugs related to max pooling that I'd like to get a fix for into 0.11: SYSTEMML-1076, SYSTEMML-1077. -- Mike Dusenberry GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry Sent from my iPhone. > On Oct 31, 2016, at 3:48 PM, Luciano Resende wrote: > >

Re: SystemML 0.11.0-incubating RC4 feedback

2016-10-31 Thread Luciano Resende
On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 2:11 PM, Deron Eriksson wrote: > Also, to quote Justin Mclean: > "It not clear to me what exactly is the release artefacts here, for > instance why does this directory include jars? Can you please clarify." > > From this response, I think it is clear that our large number

Re: Collection project progress for SystemML report

2016-10-31 Thread Matthias Boehm
thanks Felix for taking this over. Here is a list of recent papers and tutorials: 1) VLDB'16 Papers: We presented the papers "Compressed Linear Algebra for Large-Scale Machine Learning" (research paper + poster) and "SystemML: Declarative Machine Learning on Spark" (industry paper) at VLDB'16

Re: SystemML 0.11.0-incubating RC4 feedback

2016-10-31 Thread Deron Eriksson
Also, to quote Justin Mclean: "It not clear to me what exactly is the release artefacts here, for instance why does this directory include jars? Can you please clarify." >From this response, I think it is clear that our large number of artifacts is causing confusion. We can in part reduce this con

Collection project progress for SystemML report

2016-10-31 Thread fschueler
Hi all, we are in the process of writing the next Apache PMC report for SystemML. This report is an important part of the graduation process as an Apache incubator where we can show our progress as a project and community. We are therefore collecting everything that demonstrates the progress

Re: Podling Report Reminder - November 2016

2016-10-31 Thread Deron Eriksson
Thank you Felix! I really appreciate it! Deron On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 1:01 PM, wrote: > I will help you, Deron! > > Felix > > > Am 31.10.2016 20:26 schrieb Deron Eriksson: > >> If there are no other volunteers to help with the report, I will help. If >> anyone else is interested in writing th

Re: [DISCUSS] Adding tensorboard-like functionality to SystemML

2016-10-31 Thread Deron Eriksson
Hi Jeremy, I think moving forward with visualization and design is a great idea, especially since I feel there is currently momentum after the great design refactoring of the project website. Mike and Jeremy, please let me know if there's any way in which I can help. Deron On Fri, Oct 28, 2016

Re: Podling Report Reminder - November 2016

2016-10-31 Thread fschueler
I will help you, Deron! Felix Am 31.10.2016 20:26 schrieb Deron Eriksson: If there are no other volunteers to help with the report, I will help. If anyone else is interested in writing the monthly report, I would also be very happy to provide any assistance and guidance. Contributing to the p

Re: Podling Report Reminder - November 2016

2016-10-31 Thread Deron Eriksson
If there are no other volunteers to help with the report, I will help. If anyone else is interested in writing the monthly report, I would also be very happy to provide any assistance and guidance. Contributing to the project monthly report is a great way to become familiar with ASF procedures and

Re: rc3 source-release.zip artifact

2016-10-31 Thread Deron Eriksson
Another option would be to have a page on the main website or documentation site that describes all the different artifacts. Or, we could have a README plus a web page and cover all bases. Adding a README to the artifacts could be a good JIRA for someone who wants to learn more about the project

Re: rc3 source-release.zip artifact

2016-10-31 Thread Madison Myers
+1 "Should we include a README with the release artifacts that describes what each one is?" On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 9:24 AM, wrote: > Should we include a README with the release artifacts that describes what > each one is? > > -- > > Mike Dusenberry > GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw > LinkedIn:

Re: SystemML 0.11.0-incubating RC4 feedback

2016-10-31 Thread Deron Eriksson
Hi, I mentioned here that the "source-release.zip" is not something I recognize: https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org/msg00960.html Is this mystery artifact created by the script to deploy release candidates? It should definitely be removed in my opinion. Deron On S

Re: rc3 source-release.zip artifact

2016-10-31 Thread dusenberrymw
Should we include a README with the release artifacts that describes what each one is? -- Mike Dusenberry GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry Sent from my iPhone. > On Oct 29, 2016, at 10:55 PM, Glenn Weidner wrote: > > In my opinion it can be removed. >

Consider highlighting your podling at ApacheCON in Seville

2016-10-31 Thread Roman Shaposhnik
Hi! with ApacheCON in Seville right around the corner chances are you've made your travel arrangements already. If you happen to be around the conference on Fri, November 18th, 16:30 - 17:20 why not use that time to highlight your favorite podling? https://s.apache.org/aceu2016_shark_tank Po