The site looks really good everyone! Thank to everyone for churning out
this awesome! Thanks for your diligence during design and development
process!

Luciano, your fix is just fine for now until a more encompassing solution
is designed which we should arrive at soon.



On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 9:20 AM Luciano Resende <luckbr1...@gmail.com>
wrote:

I made that change, as I think we need to ve able to list all available
mailing lists, but I didn't want to use the obsolete docs page.

Thinking more about this, maybe a meet in the middle approach is to use the
full details on the community page, and revert the front page to focus on
the dev list ?

Tgoughts ?

On Wednesday, October 26, 2016, Jason Azares <jason.aza...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Deron,
>
> Thanks for publishing the updates, and the site looks great! One thing I
> noticed is that the "Subscribe to Our Mailing Lists" section does not
> reflect what the design team originally had. I'm not sure if you were
aware
> of this discrepancy.
>
> [image: Inline image 1]
>
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 9:53 PM, Deron Eriksson <deroneriks...@gmail.com
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','deroneriks...@gmail.com');>> wrote:
>
>> Hi Luciano,
>>
>> Since the current website updates are major improvements, I have gone
>> ahead
>> and published the new updates. I think we can now start publishing more
>> frequently since important parts of the codebase have stabilized.
>>
>> Deron
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 5:40 PM, Deron Eriksson <deroneriks...@gmail.com
>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','deroneriks...@gmail.com');>>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Hi Luciano,
>> >
>> > Several updates to the website were merged today. I think we're at the
>> > point where we can publish the new website updates. Do you agree?
>> >
>> > Deron
>> >
>> >
>> > On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 11:02 AM, Jason Azares <jason.aza...@gmail.com
>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','jason.aza...@gmail.com');>>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> >> Hi Luciano,
>> >>
>> >> Initial page:
>> >> >  - What's the intention of the section just above the social banner
>> ? I
>> >> > noticed it was actually a copy of a section from the community page,
>> >> but it
>> >> > looks like the content was duplicated and not extracted to a banner,
>> >> and I
>> >> > have changed the one in community to what I think it better
clarifies
>> >> the
>> >> > mailing list, but I am not sure if that's the same intent of the
>> banner
>> >> on
>> >> > the initial page.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Thanks for bringing this point to our attention. The content on the
>> >> initial
>> >> page is different from the community page. We wanted to have a call to
>> >> action to get users to subscribe to the mailing list. We are currently
>> >> designing this section and will send a pull request once completed.
>> >>
>> >> Navigation Menu:
>> >> > - The community navigation seems to have gone wild with a few
>> >> duplications.
>> >> > We have source code and github links, which are both the same. We
>> also
>> >> have
>> >> > the community get involved link that includes a list of committers
>> using
>> >> > the new design format, but there is also a link to project
committers
>> >> that
>> >> > include the old page listing all committers.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Dexter is currently working to resolve this issue. He will send his
>> >> updates
>> >> once they are finished.
>> >>
>> >> Hope this clears things up!
>> >>
>> >> Best,
>> >> Jason
>> >>
>> >> On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 7:09 PM, Luciano Resende <luckbr1...@gmail.com
>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','luckbr1...@gmail.com');>>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > I have a few questions on the contents of the website in the master
>> >> branch
>> >> > :
>> >> >
>> >> > Initial page:
>> >> >
>> >> >  - What's the intention of the section just above the social banner
>> ? I
>> >> > noticed it was actually a copy of a section from the community page,
>> >> but it
>> >> > looks like the content was duplicated and not extracted to a banner,
>> >> and I
>> >> > have changed the one in community to what I think it better
clarifies
>> >> the
>> >> > mailing list, but I am not sure if that's the same intent of the
>> banner
>> >> on
>> >> > the initial page.
>> >> >
>> >> > Navigation Menu:
>> >> > - The community navigation seems to have gone wild with a few
>> >> duplications.
>> >> > We have source code and github links, which are both the same. We
>> also
>> >> have
>> >> > the community get involved link that includes a list of committers
>> using
>> >> > the new design format, but there is also a link to project
committers
>> >> that
>> >> > include the old page listing all committers.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > Once we resolve the items above (which are more like cleanups), I
>> think
>> >> we
>> >> > might be at a point where we could publish these latest updates to
>> the
>> >> live
>> >> > website.
>> >> >
>> >> > Thoughts ?
>> >> >
>> >> > --
>> >> > Luciano Resende
>> >> > http://twitter.com/lresende1975
>> >> > http://lresende.blogspot.com/
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>>
>
>

--
Sent from my Mobile device

Reply via email to